• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单一手术程序,结合心外膜起搏器植入和随后感染起搏系统的提取,用于依赖起搏器的患者。

Single surgical procedure combining epicardial pacemaker implantation and subsequent extraction of the infected pacing system for pacemaker-dependent patients.

机构信息

Bordeaux University 2 and University Medical Center of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

出版信息

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Aug;146(2):302-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.07.026. Epub 2012 Sep 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.07.026
PMID:22964353
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Management of pacemaker infection in pacing-dependent patients is often challenging. Typically, temporary pacing is used while antibiotic therapy is given for a number of days before reimplantation of a new endocardial system. This results in a prolonged hospital stay and complications associated with temporary pacing. In this study, we examine the feasibility of performing a single combined procedure of epicardial pacemaker implantation followed by system extraction.

METHODS

One hundred consecutive infected pacemaker-dependent patients underwent implantation of 2 epicardial ventricular leads and were converted to a ventricular demand pacing system. The infected pacing system was then extracted during the same procedure. Patients were followed up for 12 months.

RESULTS

Significant pericardial bleeding developed during the procedure in 3 patients. The presence of the pericardial drain positioned during the implantation of the epicardial pacing system meant that cardiac tamponade did not occur, allowing surgical repair with sternotomy to be carried out under stable hemodynamic conditions. Two of these 100 patients died in the 30-day postoperative period; 1 death was due to septic shock and 1 to pulmonary distress. Median 1-year epicardial pacing thresholds were stable and excellent (1.4 ± 0.9 volts). However, 1 of the 2 leads developed increased thresholds in 6 patients, which led to the exclusive use of other ventricular lead.

CONCLUSIONS

A single combined procedure of surgical epicardial pacemaker implantation and pacemaker system extraction appears to be a safe and effective method for managing pacemaker-dependent patients with infected pacemakers.

摘要

目的

起搏依赖患者的起搏器感染管理常常具有挑战性。通常,在新的心内膜系统重新植入之前,会使用临时起搏,同时给予抗生素治疗数天。这会导致住院时间延长,并出现与临时起搏相关的并发症。在这项研究中,我们研究了行单次联合心外膜起搏器植入术和系统取出术的可行性。

方法

100 例感染性起搏器依赖患者接受了 2 个心外膜心室导联的植入,并转换为心室按需起搏系统。随后在同一手术中取出感染的起搏系统。患者随访 12 个月。

结果

3 例患者在手术过程中出现明显的心包积血。心包引流管在心外膜起搏系统植入过程中的存在意味着没有发生心脏压塞,允许在稳定的血流动力学条件下进行经胸骨切开术的外科修复。这 100 例患者中有 2 例在术后 30 天内死亡;1 例死于感染性休克,1 例死于呼吸窘迫。中位 1 年的心外膜起搏阈值稳定且良好(1.4±0.9 伏)。然而,在 6 例患者中,其中 2 个导联中的 1 个导联出现了阈值增加的情况,导致仅使用其他心室导联。

结论

单次联合心外膜起搏器植入术和起搏器系统取出术似乎是一种安全有效的方法,可用于管理感染性起搏器的起搏依赖患者。

相似文献

1
Single surgical procedure combining epicardial pacemaker implantation and subsequent extraction of the infected pacing system for pacemaker-dependent patients.单一手术程序,结合心外膜起搏器植入和随后感染起搏系统的提取,用于依赖起搏器的患者。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Aug;146(2):302-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.07.026. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
2
Comparison of delayed transvenous reimplantation and immediate surgical epicardial approach in pacing-dependent patients undergoing extraction of infected permanent pacemakers.感染性永久性起搏器取出术的起搏依赖患者中延迟经静脉再植入与即刻手术心外膜途径的比较
Heart Rhythm. 2015 Jun;12(6):1209-15. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.02.023. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
3
Infections secondary to pacemaker implantation: a synopsis of six cases.起搏器植入术后继发感染:6例病例概述
Cardiovasc J Afr. 2012 Nov 23;23(10):e1-4. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2012-035.
4
Endocardial pacemaker implantation in infants weighing < or = 10 kilograms.体重小于或等于10千克婴儿的心内膜起搏器植入术。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2004 Nov;27(11):1466-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2004.00663.x.
5
Efficacy of prophylactic epicardial pacing leads in children and young adults.预防性心外膜起搏导线在儿童和年轻成人中的疗效。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Jul;78(1):197-202; discussion 202-3. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.02.008.
6
Same-day contralateral implantation of a permanent device after lead extraction for isolated pocket infection.同期行永久性心脏起搏器同侧植入术治疗孤立性囊袋感染导致的导线拔除术后感染。
Europace. 2014 Feb;16(2):252-7. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut220. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
7
Permanent epicardial pacing in pediatric patients: 12-year experience at a single center.小儿患者的永久性心外膜起搏:单中心 12 年经验。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Feb;93(2):634-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.09.072. Epub 2011 Dec 21.
8
Utility and safety of temporary pacing using active fixation leads and externalized re-usable permanent pacemakers after lead extraction.经皮心内膜下心导管术后使用主动固定导丝和可重复使用的外部永久性起搏器进行临时起搏的实用性和安全性。
Europace. 2013 Sep;15(9):1287-91. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut045. Epub 2013 Mar 12.
9
Long-term follow-up after pacemaker implantation in neonates and infants.新生儿和婴儿起搏器植入后的长期随访
Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Apr;83(4):1420-3. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.11.042.
10
Less-invasive surgical extraction of problematic or infected permanent transvenous pacemaker system.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 Apr;79(4):1250-4. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.08.055.

引用本文的文献

1
Current Views on Infective Endocarditis: Changing Epidemiology, Improving Diagnostic Tools and Centering the Patient for Up-to-Date Management.感染性心内膜炎的当前观点:不断变化的流行病学、改进的诊断工具以及以患者为中心的最新管理方法
Life (Basel). 2023 Jan 30;13(2):377. doi: 10.3390/life13020377.
2
Recurrent pericardial effusion and tamponade after epicardial pacemaker lead placement: a case report.心外膜起搏器导线置入术后复发性心包积液和心脏压塞:一例报告
Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2022 Mar 11;6(4):ytac114. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytac114. eCollection 2022 Apr.
3
Working on the dirty side-the ipsilateral subclavian access for temporary pacing after lead extraction.
处理棘手情况——导线拔除后经同侧锁骨下途径进行临时起搏
J Arrhythm. 2022 Feb 4;38(2):192-198. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12677. eCollection 2022 Apr.
4
Therapy and outcomes of cardiac implantable electronic devices infections.心脏植入式电子设备感染的治疗和结果。
Europace. 2021 Jun 23;23(23 Suppl 4):iv20-iv27. doi: 10.1093/europace/euab016.
5
A Review of Temporary Permanent Pacemakers and a Comparison with Conventional Temporary Pacemakers.临时永久性起搏器综述及其与传统临时起搏器的比较。
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2019 May 15;10(5):3652-3661. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2019.100506. eCollection 2019 May.
6
Timing of device reimplantation and reinfection rates following cardiac implantable electronic device infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.心脏植入式电子设备感染后再次植入和再感染率的时间:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 3;9(9):e029537. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029537.
7
Percutaneous Lead Extraction in Infection of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: a Systematic Review.心脏植入式电子设备感染中的经皮导线拔除术:一项系统评价。
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Mar-Apr;33(2):194-202. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2017-0144.
8
[Pacemaker dependant and/or repetitive ICD therapies. How to solve the dilemma of lead extraction?].[起搏器依赖和/或重复性植入式心律转复除颤器治疗。如何解决导线拔除的困境?]
Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2013 Sep;24(3):152-7. doi: 10.1007/s00399-013-0281-7. Epub 2013 Aug 17.