Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Canada.
Am J Community Psychol. 2013 Jun;51(3-4):347-58. doi: 10.1007/s10464-012-9554-2.
This research focused on the relationships between a national team and five project sites across Canada in planning a complex, community intervention for homeless people with mental illness called At Home/Chez Soi, which is based on the Housing First model. The research addressed two questions: (a) what are the challenges in planning? and (b) what factors that helped or hindered moving project planning forward? Using qualitative methods, 149 national, provincial, and local stakeholders participated in key informant or focus group interviews. We found that planning entails not only intervention and research tasks, but also relational processes that occur within an ecology of time, local context, and values. More specifically, the relationships between the national team and the project sites can be conceptualized as a collaborative process in which national and local partners bring different agendas to the planning process and must therefore listen to, negotiate, discuss, and compromise with one another. A collaborative process that involves power-sharing and having project coordinators at each site helped to bridge the differences between these two stakeholder groups, to find common ground, and to accomplish planning tasks within a compressed time frame. While local context and culture pushed towards unique adaptations of Housing First, the principles of the Housing First model provided a foundation for a common approach across sites and interventions. The implications of the findings for future planning and research of multi-site, complex, community interventions are noted.
本研究聚焦于一个国家团队与加拿大五个项目点之间的关系,以规划一个名为“At Home/Chez Soi”的针对有精神疾病的无家可归者的复杂社区干预措施,该措施基于“先住房,再治疗”模式。研究主要关注两个问题:(a)规划面临的挑战是什么?(b)哪些因素有助于或阻碍项目规划的推进?采用定性方法,149 名国家、省和地方利益相关者参与了重点信息或焦点小组访谈。我们发现,规划不仅需要干预和研究任务,还需要在时间、当地背景和价值观的生态系统内发生的关系过程。具体而言,国家团队与项目点之间的关系可以被概念化为一个协作过程,其中国家和地方合作伙伴将不同的议程带入规划过程,因此必须相互倾听、协商、讨论和妥协。一个涉及权力分享和在每个地点设立项目协调员的协作过程有助于弥合这两个利益相关者群体之间的差异,找到共同点,并在压缩的时间内完成规划任务。虽然当地背景和文化推动了“先住房,再治疗”模式的独特适应,但该模式的原则为各地点和干预措施提供了共同方法的基础。本文还讨论了对未来多地点、复杂社区干预措施的规划和研究的启示。