Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Granada, Campus Cartuja s/n, 18071 Granada, Spain.
Appetite. 2012 Dec;59(3):898-904. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2012.09.004. Epub 2012 Sep 8.
This article studied the role of contextual cues, present at the time flavor conditioning occurs, on intake behavior in rats. In three experiments animals were given flavor-sucrose pairings in one distinctive context (Context A) whereas the flavor was presented unreinforced in an alternative context (Context B). Experiments 1 and 2 used a simple Pavlovian discrimination procedure (A: X+, B: X-) and tested consumption of flavor X in each context. Consumption of the flavor was higher in Context A than in Context B. In Experiment 2 rats were given a treatment (exposure to water in the context) designed to extinguish associations between the context and the reinforcer. This procedure did not affect the ability of the context to control intake of flavor X. Experiment 3 used a biconditional discrimination procedure (A: X+, Y-; B: X-, Y+; where X and Y were different flavors) in which no single context or flavor predicted reinforcement. The rats learned this discrimination, consuming more of each flavor in the context in which it had previously been reinforced. The results are interpreted in terms both of the effects of direct associations between context and events presented in them, and in terms of the modulatory or occasion-setting properties of the context.
本文研究了语境线索在大鼠味觉条件作用发生时的作用,以及这些线索对摄食行为的影响。在三个实验中,动物在一个特定的环境(环境 A)中接受味觉-蔗糖配对,而在另一个替代环境(环境 B)中,味觉则没有得到强化。实验 1 和 2 使用了简单的巴甫洛夫辨别程序(A:X+,B:X-),并测试了每种环境下对味觉 X 的消耗。在环境 A 中,味觉的消耗高于环境 B。在实验 2 中,给老鼠进行了一种处理(在环境中暴露于水中),旨在消除环境与强化物之间的联系。这个程序并没有影响环境控制味觉 X 摄入的能力。实验 3 使用了双条件辨别程序(A:X+,Y-;B:X-,Y+;其中 X 和 Y 是不同的味道),在这个程序中,没有单一的环境或味道可以预测强化。老鼠学会了这种辨别,在之前强化过的环境中,每种味道的摄入量都增加了。这些结果既可以从环境和其中呈现的事件之间的直接关联的影响来解释,也可以从环境的调节或情境设定的属性来解释。