• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小鼠的巴甫洛夫条件性和工具性双辨别学习。

Pavlovian contextual and instrumental biconditional discrimination learning in mice.

机构信息

Brown University, United States.

出版信息

Behav Brain Res. 2013 Nov 1;256:398-404. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.09.010. Epub 2013 Sep 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.bbr.2013.09.010
PMID:24016837
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4306232/
Abstract

Genetically-modified animal models are a powerful tool for investigating the link between neurological and behavioral changes and for the development of therapeutic interventions. Executive function deficits are symptomatic of many human clinical disorders but few tasks exist for studying executive functions in mice. To address this need, we describe procedures for establishing Pavlovian contextual and instrumental biconditional discriminations (BCDs) in C57BL/6J mice. In the first experiment, contextual cues disambiguated when two short duration stimulus targets would be followed by food pellets. In the second experiment, discrete visual cues signaled when lever press or nose poke responses would be continuously reinforced with food pellets. Mice learned both BCDs as evidenced by differential responding in each cue during training and, more critically, during extinction testing. The implications of these findings for using BCD tasks to analyze the neural substrates of executive processing in animal models are discussed.

摘要

遗传修饰动物模型是研究神经和行为变化之间联系以及开发治疗干预措施的有力工具。执行功能缺陷是许多人类临床疾病的症状,但很少有任务用于研究小鼠的执行功能。为了解决这一需求,我们描述了在 C57BL/6J 小鼠中建立条件性和工具性双辨别任务(BCD)的程序。在第一个实验中,两个短持续时间的刺激目标后跟随食物球时,上下文线索可消除歧义。在第二个实验中,当杆按压或鼻触反应会连续用食物球强化时,离散的视觉线索会发出信号。小鼠在训练和更关键的消退测试中都表现出不同的反应,证明它们学会了这两个 BCD。这些发现对使用 BCD 任务来分析动物模型中执行处理的神经基础具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab23/4306232/6d7c5528d8e6/nihms524374f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab23/4306232/c810c398ede1/nihms524374f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab23/4306232/26db39d74af3/nihms524374f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab23/4306232/f2e2ac25d076/nihms524374f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab23/4306232/eae35b5d148c/nihms524374f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab23/4306232/6d7c5528d8e6/nihms524374f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab23/4306232/c810c398ede1/nihms524374f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab23/4306232/26db39d74af3/nihms524374f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab23/4306232/f2e2ac25d076/nihms524374f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab23/4306232/eae35b5d148c/nihms524374f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab23/4306232/6d7c5528d8e6/nihms524374f5.jpg

相似文献

1
Pavlovian contextual and instrumental biconditional discrimination learning in mice.小鼠的巴甫洛夫条件性和工具性双辨别学习。
Behav Brain Res. 2013 Nov 1;256:398-404. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.09.010. Epub 2013 Sep 6.
2
Pavlovian biconditional discrimination learning in the C57BL/6J mouse.C57BL/6J小鼠的巴甫洛夫双条件辨别学习
Behav Processes. 2012 Jun;90(2):278-86. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2012.02.017. Epub 2012 Mar 23.
3
Extinction of instrumental (operant) learning: interference, varieties of context, and mechanisms of contextual control.工具(操作性)学习的灭绝:干扰、语境的多样性和语境控制的机制。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2019 Jan;236(1):7-19. doi: 10.1007/s00213-018-5076-4. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
4
Perseverative instrumental and Pavlovian responding to conditioned stimuli in serotonin transporter knockout rats.5-羟色胺转运体敲除大鼠对条件刺激的持续操作性和巴甫洛夫反应。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2013 Feb;100:48-55. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2012.12.004. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
5
General Pavlovian-instrumental transfer tests reveal selective inhibition of the response type - whether Pavlovian or instrumental - performed during extinction.一般的条件性-工具性反应转移测试揭示了在消退期间进行的反应类型(无论是条件性的还是工具性的)的选择性抑制。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2021 Sep;183:107483. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2021.107483. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
6
Vagus nerve stimulation during extinction learning reduces conditioned place preference and context-induced reinstatement of cocaine seeking.在消退学习期间刺激迷走神经会减少条件性位置偏好和可卡因寻求的情境诱发复燃。
Brain Stimul. 2019 Nov-Dec;12(6):1448-1455. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.07.001. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
7
Extinguishing cue-controlled reward choice: Effects of Pavlovian extinction on outcome-selective Pavlovian-instrumental transfer.消除线索控制的奖赏选择:巴甫洛夫式消退对结果选择性巴甫洛夫-工具性转移的影响
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2018 Jul;44(3):280-292. doi: 10.1037/xan0000176.
8
Acute stress persistently alters instrumental motivation without affecting appetitive Pavlovian conditioning, extinction, or contextual renewal.急性应激持续改变工具性动机,而不影响食欲性巴甫洛夫条件反射、消退或情境性恢复。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2023 Jul;202:107771. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2023.107771. Epub 2023 May 12.
9
Rats that sign-track are resistant to Pavlovian but not instrumental extinction.出现信号追踪行为的大鼠对巴甫洛夫式消退具有抗性,但对工具性消退则不然。
Behav Brain Res. 2016 Jan 1;296:418-430. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.07.055. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
10
Lesions of the basolateral amygdala disrupt selective aspects of reinforcer representation in rats.基底外侧杏仁核的损伤会破坏大鼠强化物表征的某些特定方面。
J Neurosci. 2001 Nov 15;21(22):9018-26. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-22-09018.2001.

引用本文的文献

1
Anabolic-androgenic steroid abuse and cognitive impairment: Testosterone IMPAIRS biconditional task performance in male rats.滥用合成代谢雄激素和认知障碍:睾酮损害雄性大鼠的双条件任务表现。
Behav Brain Res. 2020 Feb 3;379:112339. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.112339. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
2
Interactions between the hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, and amygdala support complex learning and memory.海马体、前额叶皮质和杏仁核之间的相互作用支持复杂的学习和记忆。
F1000Res. 2019 Jul 31;8. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.19317.1. eCollection 2019.
3
The effect of US signalling and the US-CS interval on backward conditioning in mice.

本文引用的文献

1
Hierarchical and binary associations compete for behavioral control during instrumental biconditional discrimination.在工具性双条件辨别过程中,层级关联和二元关联竞争行为控制。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2013 Jan;39(1):2-13. doi: 10.1037/a0030941.
2
Associative and occasion-setting properties of contextual cues in flavor-nutrient learning in rats.大鼠在味觉-营养学习中语境线索的关联和情境设定属性。
Appetite. 2012 Dec;59(3):898-904. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2012.09.004. Epub 2012 Sep 8.
3
The effects of chemotherapy on cognitive function in a mouse model: a prospective study.
美国信号和美国-条件刺激间隔对小鼠逆向条件作用的影响。
Learn Motiv. 2014 Nov;48:22-32. doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2014.08.002.
化疗对小鼠模型认知功能的影响:一项前瞻性研究。
Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Jun 1;18(11):3112-21. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-0060. Epub 2012 Mar 30.
4
Pavlovian biconditional discrimination learning in the C57BL/6J mouse.C57BL/6J小鼠的巴甫洛夫双条件辨别学习
Behav Processes. 2012 Jun;90(2):278-86. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2012.02.017. Epub 2012 Mar 23.
5
Comprehensive neurocognitive endophenotyping strategies for mouse models of genetic disorders.遗传性疾病小鼠模型的全面神经认知内表型策略。
Prog Neurobiol. 2012 Feb;96(2):220-41. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2011.12.001. Epub 2012 Jan 13.
6
Differential outcome effects in pavlovian biconditional and ambiguous occasion setting tasks.巴甫洛夫双条件和模糊情境设置任务中的差异结果效应
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010 Oct;36(4):471-81. doi: 10.1037/a0019136.
7
Behavioral flexibility in a mouse model of developmental cerebellar Purkinje cell loss.发育性小脑浦肯野细胞缺失小鼠模型中的行为灵活性。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2010 Sep;94(2):220-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2010.05.010. Epub 2010 Jun 1.
8
Some appetitive procedures for examining associative learning in the mouse: Implications for psychopathology.一些用于检测小鼠联想学习的 appetitive 程序:对精神病理学的启示。
Behav Brain Res. 2010 Aug 25;211(2):240-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.03.047. Epub 2010 Mar 31.
9
Genetic dissection of neural circuits and behavior in Mus musculus.小家鼠神经回路与行为的遗传学剖析
Adv Genet. 2009;65:1-38. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2660(09)65001-X.
10
Modeling cognitive endophenotypes of schizophrenia in mice.在小鼠中模拟精神分裂症的认知内表型。
Trends Neurosci. 2009 Jun;32(6):347-58. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2009.02.003. Epub 2009 May 4.