Prince Jon B, Pfordresher Peter Q
School of Psychology, Murdoch University, WA 6150, Australia.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2012 Oct;141(2):184-98. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.07.013. Epub 2012 Sep 8.
In two experiments we explored how the dimensions of pitch and time contribute to the perception and production of musical sequences. We tested how dimensional diversity (the number of unique categories in each dimension) affects how pitch and time combine. In Experiment 1, 18 musically trained participants rated the complexity of sequences varying only in their diversity in pitch or time; a separate group of 18 pianists reproduced these sequences after listening to them without practice. Overall, sequences with more diversity were perceived as more complex, but pitch diversity influenced ratings more strongly than temporal diversity. Further, although participants perceived sequences with high levels of pitch diversity as more complex, errors were more common in the sequences with higher diversity in time. Sequences in Experiment 2 exhibited diversity in both pitch and time; diversity levels were a subset of those tested in Experiment 1. Again diversity affected complexity ratings and errors, but there were no statistical interactions between dimensions. Nonetheless, pitch diversity was the primary factor in determining perceived complexity, and again temporal errors occurred more often than pitch errors. Additionally, diversity in one dimension influenced error rates in the other dimension in that both error types were more frequent relative to Experiment 1. These results suggest that although pitch and time do not interact directly, they are nevertheless not processed in an informationally encapsulated manner. The findings also align with a dimensional salience hypothesis, in which pitch is prioritised in the processing of typical Western musical sequences.
在两项实验中,我们探究了音高和时间维度如何影响音乐序列的感知与生成。我们测试了维度多样性(每个维度中独特类别的数量)如何影响音高和时间的组合方式。在实验1中,18名接受过音乐训练的参与者对仅在音高或时间维度上具有不同多样性的序列的复杂度进行了评分;另一组由18名钢琴家组成,他们在聆听这些序列后,未经练习就进行了再现。总体而言,具有更多样性的序列被认为更复杂,但音高多样性对评分的影响比时间多样性更强。此外,尽管参与者认为音高多样性较高的序列更复杂,但在时间维度上具有更高多样性的序列中,错误更为常见。实验2中的序列在音高和时间维度上均呈现出多样性;多样性水平是实验1中所测试水平的一个子集。同样,多样性影响了复杂度评分和错误情况,但维度之间不存在统计上的交互作用。尽管如此,音高多样性仍是决定感知复杂度的主要因素,并且时间维度上的错误再次比音高维度上的错误更频繁地出现。此外,一个维度上的多样性会影响另一个维度上的错误率,相对于实验1,两种错误类型都更为频繁。这些结果表明,尽管音高和时间并非直接相互作用,但它们也并非以信息封装的方式进行处理。这些发现也与维度显著性假设相符,即在处理典型的西方音乐序列时,音高具有优先性。