Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Feb;28(2):283-91. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2198-y. Epub 2012 Sep 12.
The current review examines the effectiveness of simulation-based medical education (SBME) for training health professionals in cardiac physical examination and examines the relative effectiveness of key instructional design features.
Data sources included a comprehensive, systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, ERIC, Web of Science, and Scopus through May 2011. Included studies investigated SBME to teach health profession learners cardiac physical examination skills using outcomes of knowledge or skill. We carried out duplicate assessment of study quality and data abstraction and pooled effect sizes using random effects.
We identified 18 articles for inclusion. Thirteen compared SBME to no-intervention (either single group pre-post comparisons or SBME added to other instruction common to all learners, such as traditional bedside teaching), three compared SBME to other educational interventions, and two compared two SBME interventions. Meta-analysis of the 13 no-intervention comparison studies demonstrated that simulation-based instruction in cardiac auscultation was effective, with pooled effect sizes of 1.10 (95 % CI 0.49-1.72; p < 0.001; I(2) = 92.4 %) for knowledge outcomes and 0.87 (95 % CI 0.52-1.22; p < 0.001; I(2) = 91.5 %) for skills. In sub-group analysis, hands-on practice with the simulator appeared to be an important teaching technique. Narrative review of the comparative effectiveness studies suggests that SBME may be of similar effectiveness to other active educational interventions, but more studies are required.
The quantity of published evidence and the relative lack of comparative effectiveness studies limit this review.
SBME is an effective educational strategy for teaching cardiac auscultation. Future studies should focus on comparing key instructional design features and establishing SBME's relative effectiveness compared to other educational interventions.
本综述考察了基于模拟的医学教育(SBME)在培训心脏体格检查方面对卫生专业人员的有效性,并考察了关键教学设计特征的相对有效性。
数据来源包括通过 2011 年 5 月对 MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、PsychINFO、ERIC、Web of Science 和 Scopus 进行的全面、系统的搜索。纳入的研究使用知识或技能的结果调查了 SBME 用于教授卫生专业学习者心脏体格检查技能。我们采用重复评估研究质量和数据提取,并使用随机效应汇总效应大小。
我们确定了 18 篇纳入的文章。13 项研究将 SBME 与无干预措施进行比较(要么是单组前后比较,要么是 SBME 加于所有学习者共同的其他教学内容,如传统的床边教学),3 项研究将 SBME 与其他教育干预措施进行比较,2 项研究将两种 SBME 干预措施进行比较。对 13 项无干预措施比较研究的荟萃分析表明,心脏听诊的基于模拟的教学是有效的,知识结果的汇总效应大小为 1.10(95 % CI 0.49-1.72;p<0.001;I(2) = 92.4 %),技能结果的汇总效应大小为 0.87(95 % CI 0.52-1.22;p<0.001;I(2) = 91.5 %)。在亚组分析中,使用模拟器进行动手实践似乎是一种重要的教学技术。对比较有效性研究的叙述性综述表明,SBME 可能与其他主动教育干预措施具有相似的有效性,但需要更多的研究。
发表证据的数量相对缺乏比较有效性研究限制了本综述。
SBME 是教授心脏听诊的有效教育策略。未来的研究应侧重于比较关键的教学设计特征,并确定 SBME 与其他教育干预措施的相对有效性。