Suppr超能文献

基于模拟的心脏听诊技能培训:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Simulation-based training for cardiac auscultation skills: systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Feb;28(2):283-91. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2198-y. Epub 2012 Sep 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The current review examines the effectiveness of simulation-based medical education (SBME) for training health professionals in cardiac physical examination and examines the relative effectiveness of key instructional design features.

METHODS

Data sources included a comprehensive, systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, ERIC, Web of Science, and Scopus through May 2011. Included studies investigated SBME to teach health profession learners cardiac physical examination skills using outcomes of knowledge or skill. We carried out duplicate assessment of study quality and data abstraction and pooled effect sizes using random effects.

RESULTS

We identified 18 articles for inclusion. Thirteen compared SBME to no-intervention (either single group pre-post comparisons or SBME added to other instruction common to all learners, such as traditional bedside teaching), three compared SBME to other educational interventions, and two compared two SBME interventions. Meta-analysis of the 13 no-intervention comparison studies demonstrated that simulation-based instruction in cardiac auscultation was effective, with pooled effect sizes of 1.10 (95 % CI 0.49-1.72; p < 0.001; I(2) = 92.4 %) for knowledge outcomes and 0.87 (95 % CI 0.52-1.22; p < 0.001; I(2) = 91.5 %) for skills. In sub-group analysis, hands-on practice with the simulator appeared to be an important teaching technique. Narrative review of the comparative effectiveness studies suggests that SBME may be of similar effectiveness to other active educational interventions, but more studies are required.

LIMITATIONS

The quantity of published evidence and the relative lack of comparative effectiveness studies limit this review.

CONCLUSIONS

SBME is an effective educational strategy for teaching cardiac auscultation. Future studies should focus on comparing key instructional design features and establishing SBME's relative effectiveness compared to other educational interventions.

摘要

目的

本综述考察了基于模拟的医学教育(SBME)在培训心脏体格检查方面对卫生专业人员的有效性,并考察了关键教学设计特征的相对有效性。

方法

数据来源包括通过 2011 年 5 月对 MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、PsychINFO、ERIC、Web of Science 和 Scopus 进行的全面、系统的搜索。纳入的研究使用知识或技能的结果调查了 SBME 用于教授卫生专业学习者心脏体格检查技能。我们采用重复评估研究质量和数据提取,并使用随机效应汇总效应大小。

结果

我们确定了 18 篇纳入的文章。13 项研究将 SBME 与无干预措施进行比较(要么是单组前后比较,要么是 SBME 加于所有学习者共同的其他教学内容,如传统的床边教学),3 项研究将 SBME 与其他教育干预措施进行比较,2 项研究将两种 SBME 干预措施进行比较。对 13 项无干预措施比较研究的荟萃分析表明,心脏听诊的基于模拟的教学是有效的,知识结果的汇总效应大小为 1.10(95 % CI 0.49-1.72;p<0.001;I(2) = 92.4 %),技能结果的汇总效应大小为 0.87(95 % CI 0.52-1.22;p<0.001;I(2) = 91.5 %)。在亚组分析中,使用模拟器进行动手实践似乎是一种重要的教学技术。对比较有效性研究的叙述性综述表明,SBME 可能与其他主动教育干预措施具有相似的有效性,但需要更多的研究。

局限性

发表证据的数量相对缺乏比较有效性研究限制了本综述。

结论

SBME 是教授心脏听诊的有效教育策略。未来的研究应侧重于比较关键的教学设计特征,并确定 SBME 与其他教育干预措施的相对有效性。

相似文献

8

引用本文的文献

4
Use of Simulation Based Training to Enhance Cardiac Auscultation Proficiency.使用基于模拟的培训来提高心脏听诊能力。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2020 Nov 18;9:258. doi: 10.15694/mep.2020.000258.1. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验