Jeong Il Soon, Park Jae-Hyeong, Jin Seon Ah, Kim Jun Hyung, Lee Jae-Hwan, Choi Si Wan, Jeong Jin-Ok, Seong In-Whan
Cardiology Division in Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Chungnam National University, Chungnam National University Hospital, 33 Munhwa-ro, Jung-gu, Daejeon, 301-721, Korea.
Heart Vessels. 2013 Sep;28(5):578-82. doi: 10.1007/s00380-012-0282-1. Epub 2012 Sep 12.
Sarpogrelate and cilostazol are two commonly used adjunctive antiplatelet agents that also can be used to improve endothelial dysfunction. We compared the effects of sarpogrelate and cilostazol on endothelial dysfunction in active male smokers with flow-mediated dilatation (FMD). We enrolled and compared baseline and follow-up FMD in 20 young male smokers without any known cardiovascular diseases. Two participants who were initially medicated with cilostazol dropped out because of severe headache after taking medication. However, they continued the other experiment with sarpogrelate medication. Baseline endothelium-dependent dilatation (EDD) after reactive hyperemia was 7.5 % ± 1.9 % and endothelium-independent dilatation (EID) after sublingual administration of nitroglycerin was 13.3 % ± 3.4 %. After a 2-week treatment of cilostazol, follow-up EDD significantly increased (7.7 % ± 1.9 to 8.8 ± 2.0 %, P = 0.016), but follow-up EID changed insignificantly (13.2 % ± 3.5 to 12.5 % ± 3.9 %, P = 0.350). With the sarpogrelate treatment, follow-up EDD was significantly increased (7.4 % ± 1.9 % to 8.8 % ± 1.9 %, P = 0.021), but follow-up EID was similar (13.5 % ± 3.5 to 14.0 % ± 3.2 %, P = 0.427). There was no clinical significance between the two groups on follow-up EDD and EID (P = 0.984 and 0.212, respectively). However, the mean score of intensity of headache was significantly higher in the cilostazol group than in the sarpogrelate group (3.8 % ± 2.5 % vs 1.4 % ± 2.2 %, P = 0.005). EDD showed a similar significant increase with 2-week treatment of cilostazol and sarpogrelate. However, intensity of headaches was significantly higher in the cilostazol group.
沙格雷酯和西洛他唑是两种常用的辅助抗血小板药物,也可用于改善内皮功能障碍。我们采用血流介导的血管舒张功能(FMD)比较了沙格雷酯和西洛他唑对活跃男性吸烟者内皮功能障碍的影响。我们招募并比较了20名无任何已知心血管疾病的年轻男性吸烟者的基线和随访FMD。两名最初服用西洛他唑的参与者在服药后因严重头痛退出。然而,他们继续接受沙格雷酯药物的另一项实验。反应性充血后基线内皮依赖性舒张功能(EDD)为7.5%±1.9%,舌下含服硝酸甘油后内皮非依赖性舒张功能(EID)为13.3%±3.4%。西洛他唑治疗2周后,随访EDD显著增加(从7.7%±1.9%增至8.8±2.0%,P = 0.016),但随访EID变化不显著(从13.2%±3.5%降至12.5%±3.9%,P = 0.350)。沙格雷酯治疗后,随访EDD显著增加(从7.4%±1.9%增至8.8%±1.9%,P = 0.021),但随访EID相似(从13.5%±3.5%增至14.0%±3.2%,P = 0.427)。两组随访EDD和EID之间无临床差异(P分别为0.984和0.212)。然而,西洛他唑组头痛强度的平均评分显著高于沙格雷酯组(3.8%±2.5%对1.4%±2.2%,P = 0.005)。西洛他唑和沙格雷酯治疗2周后EDD均显示出相似的显著增加。然而,西洛他唑组头痛强度显著更高。