Moutoussis Konstantinos
Cognitive Science Division, Department of Philosophy and History of Science, University of Athens Athens, Greece.
Front Psychol. 2012 Sep 3;3:314. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00314. eCollection 2012.
When subjects are asked to perceptually bind rapidly alternating color and motion stimuli, the pairings they report are different from the ones actually occurring in physical reality. A possible explanation for this misbinding is that the time necessary for perception is different for different visual attributes. Such an explanation is in logical harmony with the fact that the visual brain is characterized by different, functionally specialized systems, with different processing times for each; this type of organization naturally leads to different perceptual times for the corresponding attributes. In the present review, the experimental findings supporting perceptual asynchrony are presented, together with the original theoretical explanation behind the phenomenon and its implication for visual consciousness. Alternative theoretical views and additional experimental facts concerning perceptual misbinding are also reviewed, with a particular emphasis given to the role of attention. With few exceptions, most theories converge on the idea that the observed misbinding reflects a difference in perception times, which is in turn due to differences in neuronal processing times for different attributes within the brain. These processing time differences have been attributed to several different factors, attention included, with the possibility of co-existence between them.
当要求受试者在感知上绑定快速交替出现的颜色和运动刺激时,他们报告的配对与物理现实中实际出现的配对不同。这种错误绑定的一种可能解释是,不同视觉属性的感知所需时间不同。这样的解释与视觉大脑具有不同的功能专门化系统这一事实在逻辑上是一致的,每个系统具有不同的处理时间;这种组织类型自然会导致相应属性的不同感知时间。在本综述中,展示了支持感知异步的实验结果,以及该现象背后的原始理论解释及其对视觉意识的影响。还回顾了关于感知错误绑定的其他理论观点和额外的实验事实,特别强调了注意力的作用。除了少数例外,大多数理论都趋向于这样一种观点,即观察到的错误绑定反映了感知时间的差异,而这又归因于大脑中不同属性的神经元处理时间的差异。这些处理时间差异已归因于几个不同的因素,包括注意力,它们之间可能共存。