Suppr超能文献

托珠单抗单药治疗或联合非生物性疾病修正抗风湿药物治疗:一项开放性、临床实践研究的 24 周结果。

Tocilizumab as monotherapy or in combination with nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: twenty-four-week results of an open-label, clinical practice study.

机构信息

Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

出版信息

Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013 Mar;65(3):362-71. doi: 10.1002/acr.21847.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety and tolerability of tocilizumab (TCZ) as monotherapy or in combination with nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had an inadequate response at study entry to their current treatment with biologic agents or DMARDs.

METHODS

This 24-week, multicenter, open-label, phase IIIb study conducted in the US enrolled 886 patients. Treatments were allocated to patients based on their current therapy at study entry. Patients receiving monotherapy with biologic agents were assigned to TCZ 8 mg/kg monotherapy. All other patients were randomized to either TCZ 4 mg/kg + DMARDs or TCZ 8 mg/kg + DMARDs. The primary end point was the number and percentage of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) during 24 weeks of TCZ treatment. Efficacy assessments were evaluated as secondary outcomes. Data were analyzed descriptively.

RESULTS

Overall, 69 patients (7.8%) reported ≥1 SAEs. The rate of SAEs per 100 person-years was 28.3 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 23.1-34.4) overall and was similar across treatment groups: 29.1 (95% CI 21.0-39.2), 30.3 (95% CI 22.2-40.2), and 20.6 (95% CI 10.3-36.9) in the TCZ 4/8 mg/kg + DMARDs, TCZ 8 mg/kg + DMARDs, and TCZ 8 mg/kg monotherapy groups, respectively. The most common SAEs were infections (i.e., pneumonia [1.0%] and cellulitis [0.9%]). In addition, American College of Rheumatology response rates and reductions in mean Disease Activity Score based on a 28-joint count were generally similar among treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

The safety findings in this study were consistent with the previously identified safety profile of TCZ. TCZ had an AE profile consistent with prior randomized blinded studies and was effective when administered as either monotherapy or in combination with DMARDs for the treatment of RA.

摘要

目的

评估托珠单抗(TCZ)单药或与非生物性疾病修正抗风湿药物(DMARDs)联合治疗在生物制剂或 DMARDs 当前治疗应答不足的中重度类风湿关节炎(RA)患者中的安全性和耐受性。

方法

这项在美国进行的 24 周、多中心、开放性、IIIb 期研究共纳入 886 例患者。根据患者入组时的当前治疗方案分配治疗方案。接受生物制剂单药治疗的患者被分配至 TCZ 8mg/kg 单药治疗。所有其他患者被随机分配至 TCZ 4mg/kg+DMARDs 或 TCZ 8mg/kg+DMARDs。主要终点为 TCZ 治疗 24 周期间发生严重不良事件(SAEs)的患者数量和百分比。疗效评估为次要结局。数据采用描述性分析。

结果

总体而言,69 例(7.8%)患者报告了≥1 例 SAE。每 100 人年 SAE 发生率为 28.3(95%置信区间[95%CI] 23.1-34.4),各治疗组间相似:TCZ 4/8mg/kg+DMARDs、TCZ 8mg/kg+DMARDs 和 TCZ 8mg/kg 单药治疗组分别为 29.1(95%CI 21.0-39.2)、30.3(95%CI 22.2-40.2)和 20.6(95%CI 10.3-36.9)。最常见的 SAE 为感染(即肺炎[1.0%]和蜂窝织炎[0.9%])。此外,各治疗组间美国风湿病学会反应率和基于 28 个关节计数的平均疾病活动评分降低情况基本相似。

结论

本研究的安全性发现与 TCZ 先前确定的安全性特征一致。TCZ 的不良反应谱与之前的随机对照双盲研究一致,作为单药或与 DMARDs 联合治疗 RA 均有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验