D'Angiulli Amedeo, Lipina Sebastian J, Olesinska Alice
Department of Neuroscience, Carleton University Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Sep 6;6:254. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00254. eCollection 2012.
The appearance of developmental cognitive neuroscience (DCN) in the socioeconomic status (SES) research arena is hugely transformative, but challenging. We review challenges rooted in the implicit and explicit assumptions informing this newborn field. We provide balanced theoretical alternatives on how hypothesized psychological processes map onto the brain (e.g., problem of localization) and how experimental phenomena at multiple levels of analysis (e.g., behavior, cognition and the brain) could be related. We therefore examine unclear issues regarding the existing perspectives on poverty and their relationships with low SES, the evidence of low-SES adaptive functioning, historical precedents of the "alternate pathways" (neuroplasticity) interpretation of learning disabilities related to low-SES and the notion of deficit, issues of "normativity" and validity in findings of neurocognitive differences between children from different SES, and finally alternative interpretations of the complex relationship between IQ and SES. Particularly, we examine the extent to which the available laboratory results may be interpreted as showing that cognitive performance in low-SES children reflects cognitive and behavioral deficits as a result of growing up in specific environmental or cultural contexts, and how the experimental findings should be interpreted for the design of different types of interventions-particularly those related to educational practices-or translated to the public-especially the media. Although a cautionary tone permeates many studies, still, a potential deficit attribution-i.e., low-SES is associated with cognitive and behavioral developmental deficits-seems almost an inevitable implicit issue with ethical implications. Finally, we sketch the agenda for an ecological DCN, suggesting recommendations to advance the field, specifically, to minimize equivocal divulgation and maximize ethically responsible translation.
发展认知神经科学(DCN)在社会经济地位(SES)研究领域的出现具有巨大的变革性,但也颇具挑战性。我们回顾了源于这一新兴领域的隐含和明确假设的挑战。我们提供了关于假设的心理过程如何映射到大脑(例如,定位问题)以及多个分析层面(例如,行为、认知和大脑)的实验现象如何关联的平衡理论选择。因此,我们审视了关于贫困的现有观点及其与低社会经济地位关系的不明确问题、低社会经济地位适应性功能的证据、与低社会经济地位相关的学习障碍的“替代途径”(神经可塑性)解释的历史先例以及缺陷概念、不同社会经济地位儿童神经认知差异研究结果中的“规范性”和有效性问题,最后是智商与社会经济地位复杂关系的替代解释。特别是,我们研究了现有实验室结果在多大程度上可以被解释为表明低社会经济地位儿童的认知表现反映了由于在特定环境或文化背景中成长而导致的认知和行为缺陷,以及如何为不同类型的干预措施(特别是与教育实践相关的措施)的设计解释实验结果,或者如何向公众(尤其是媒体)进行转化。尽管许多研究都带有警示的口吻,但仍然,一种潜在的缺陷归因——即低社会经济地位与认知和行为发展缺陷相关——似乎几乎是一个不可避免的隐含问题,具有伦理意义。最后,我们勾勒了生态发展认知神经科学的议程,提出了推进该领域的建议,具体而言,是尽量减少模棱两可的传播,并最大限度地进行符合道德责任的转化。