• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

硬膜外左旋布比卡因与布比卡因在腹部大手术中的对比研究。

The comparative study of epidural levobupivacaine and bupivacaine in major abdominal surgeries.

作者信息

Uzuner Ali, Saracoglu Kemal Tolga, Saracoglu Ayten, Erdemli Ozcan

机构信息

Anesthesiologist, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Alanya Education and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.

出版信息

J Res Med Sci. 2011 Sep;16(9):1159-67.

PMID:22973384
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3430040/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Opioid and local anesthetic infusion by an epidural catheter is widely used as a postoperative pain management method after major abdominal surgeries. There are several agents nowadays to provide sufficient analgesia. The agents which cause less side effects but better quality of analgesia are more valuable. We aimed to postoperatively compare the analgesic, hemodynamic and arrhythmogenic effects of epidural levobupivacaine-fentanyl and bupivacaine-fentanyl solutions.

METHODS

Fifty patients were scheduled to undergo major abdominal surgery in this clinical trial. The parameters were recorded pre- and post-operatively. In Group I (n=25), bupivacaine with fentanyl solution and in Group II (n=25), levobupivacaine with fentanyl solution was infused via epidural patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). According to the preoperative and postoperative holter recording reports, the arrhythmogenic effects were examined in four catagories: ventricular arrhythmia (VA), supraventricular arrhythmia (SVA), atrioventricular conduction abnormalities and pauses longer than two seconds.

RESULTS

Mean visual analog scale (VAS) values of groups did not differ at all time. They were 6 at the end of the surgery (0. Min, p = 0.622). The scores were 5 in Group I and 4 in Group II in 30. min (p = 0.301). The frequency of SVA was higher in bupivacaine group.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our study suggest that same concentration of epidural levobupivacaine and bupivacaine with fentanyl provide stable postoperative analgesia and both were found safe for the patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.

摘要

背景

硬膜外导管输注阿片类药物和局部麻醉药作为腹部大手术后的术后疼痛管理方法被广泛应用。目前有几种药物可提供充分的镇痛效果。副作用较小但镇痛质量更好的药物更具价值。我们旨在术后比较硬膜外左旋布比卡因 - 芬太尼和布比卡因 - 芬太尼溶液的镇痛、血流动力学及致心律失常作用。

方法

本临床试验纳入50例计划行腹部大手术的患者。记录术前和术后参数。在I组(n = 25)中,通过硬膜外患者自控镇痛(PCA)输注布比卡因与芬太尼溶液,II组(n = 25)输注左旋布比卡因与芬太尼溶液。根据术前和术后动态心电图记录报告,从四类情况检查致心律失常作用:室性心律失常(VA)、室上性心律失常(SVA)、房室传导异常以及长于两秒的停搏。

结果

两组的平均视觉模拟评分(VAS)值在所有时间点均无差异。手术结束时为6分(0分钟,p = 0.622)。30分钟时I组评分为5分,II组为4分(p = 0.301)。布比卡因组的SVA发生率更高。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,相同浓度的硬膜外左旋布比卡因和布比卡因与芬太尼可提供稳定的术后镇痛,且对腹部大手术患者均安全。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f918/3430040/3f8eb0a5f60c/JRMS-16-1159-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f918/3430040/e95beb106234/JRMS-16-1159-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f918/3430040/d633d94c4385/JRMS-16-1159-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f918/3430040/d8cd457780fb/JRMS-16-1159-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f918/3430040/3f8eb0a5f60c/JRMS-16-1159-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f918/3430040/e95beb106234/JRMS-16-1159-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f918/3430040/d633d94c4385/JRMS-16-1159-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f918/3430040/d8cd457780fb/JRMS-16-1159-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f918/3430040/3f8eb0a5f60c/JRMS-16-1159-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
The comparative study of epidural levobupivacaine and bupivacaine in major abdominal surgeries.硬膜外左旋布比卡因与布比卡因在腹部大手术中的对比研究。
J Res Med Sci. 2011 Sep;16(9):1159-67.
2
Efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of levobupivacaine with and without fentanyl after continuous epidural infusion in children: a multicenter trial.左布比卡因联合与不联合芬太尼在儿童连续硬膜外输注后的疗效、安全性及药代动力学:一项多中心试验
Anesthesiology. 2003 Nov;99(5):1166-74. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200311000-00025.
3
A comparison of levobupivacaine 0.125%, fentanyl 4 microg/mL, or their combination for patient-controlled epidural analgesia after major orthopedic surgery.0.125%左旋布比卡因、4微克/毫升芬太尼或其组合用于骨科大手术后患者自控硬膜外镇痛的比较。
Anesth Analg. 1999 Dec;89(6):1497-503. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199912000-00034.
4
A Comparison of the Effects of Epidural Levobupivacaine and Morphine for Postoperative Analgesia Following Major Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.腹部大手术后硬膜外左旋布比卡因与吗啡用于术后镇痛效果的比较:一项随机对照试验
Cureus. 2023 Feb 12;15(2):e34900. doi: 10.7759/cureus.34900. eCollection 2023 Feb.
5
Effect of epidural levobupivacaine and levobupivacaine with fentanyl on stress response and postoperative analgesia after total knee replacement.硬膜外左旋布比卡因及左旋布比卡因复合芬太尼对全膝关节置换术后应激反应及镇痛的影响
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Aug;51(8):652-9. doi: 10.5414/CP201862.
6
Efficacy of ropivacaine, bupivacaine, and levobupivacaine for labor epidural analgesia.罗哌卡因、布比卡因和左旋布比卡因用于分娩硬膜外镇痛的疗效。
J Clin Anesth. 2007 May;19(3):214-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2006.11.003.
7
Comparison of continuous epidural infusion of 0.125% ropivacaine with 1 μg/ml fentanyl versus 0.125% bupivacaine with 1 μg/ml fentanyl for postoperative analgesia in major abdominal surgery.腹部大手术术后镇痛中,0.125%罗哌卡因与1μg/ml芬太尼持续硬膜外输注对比0.125%布比卡因与1μg/ml芬太尼持续硬膜外输注的效果
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Jan-Mar;34(1):29-34. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_122_16.
8
[Levobupivacaine versus racemic bupivacaine for thoracic and upper lumbar epidural anesthesia-analgesia in children].左旋布比卡因与消旋布比卡因用于儿童胸段和上腰段硬膜外麻醉-镇痛的比较
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2007 May;54(5):288-96.
9
Patient supplemented epidural analgesia after major abdominal surgery with bupivacaine/fentanyl or ropivacaine/fentanyl.腹部大手术后患者采用布比卡因/芬太尼或罗哌卡因/芬太尼进行硬膜外镇痛补充。
Can J Anaesth. 2000 Jan;47(1):27-32. doi: 10.1007/BF03020727.
10
A comparison of the analgesic efficacy of 0.25% levobupivacaine combined with 0.005% morphine, 0.25% levobupivacaine alone, or 0.005% morphine alone for the management of postoperative pain in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.比较0.25%左旋布比卡因联合0.005%吗啡、单纯0.25%左旋布比卡因或单纯0.005%吗啡用于腹部大手术患者术后疼痛管理的镇痛效果。
Anesth Analg. 1999 Dec;89(6):1504-9. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199912000-00035.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of fentanyl and sufentanil added to 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing cesarean section.比较芬太尼和舒芬太尼联合 0.5%重比重布比卡因用于剖宫产术患者脊麻的效果。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2011 Feb;60(2):103-8. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2011.60.2.103. Epub 2011 Feb 25.
2
Influence of surgical approach on the rehabilitation of patients after total knee arthroplasty.手术入路对全膝关节置换术后患者康复的影响。
Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2010 Mar-Apr;12(2):136-43.
3
Recent advances in postoperative pain management.
术后疼痛管理的最新进展。
Yale J Biol Med. 2010 Mar;83(1):11-25.
4
Prospective, randomized, controlled trial of thoracic epidural or patient-controlled opiate analgesia on perioperative quality of life.前瞻性、随机、对照试验:胸段硬膜外或患者自控阿片类药物镇痛对围手术期生活质量的影响。
Br J Anaesth. 2010 Mar;104(3):292-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq006. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
5
Multimodal pain management after total hip and knee arthroplasty at the Ranawat Orthopaedic Center.拉纳瓦特骨科中心全髋关节和膝关节置换术后的多模式疼痛管理。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Jun;467(6):1418-23. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0728-7. Epub 2009 Feb 13.
6
Update on local anesthetics: focus on levobupivacaine.局部麻醉药的最新进展:以左旋布比卡因为例。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2008 Apr;4(2):381-92. doi: 10.2147/tcrm.s1433.
7
72-hour epidural infusion of 0.125% levobupivacaine following total knee replacement: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter evaluation.全膝关节置换术后 72 小时 0.125%左旋布比卡因硬膜外输注:一项前瞻性、随机、对照、多中心评估。
Acta Biomed. 2008 Apr;79(1):28-35.
8
Observational study of perioperative PtcCO2 and SpO2 in non-ventilated patients receiving epidural infusion or patient-controlled analgesia using a single earlobe monitor (TOSCA).
Br J Anaesth. 2007 Oct;99(4):567-71. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem206. Epub 2007 Jul 25.
9
Levobupivacaine versus racemic bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia in orthopaedic major surgery.左旋布比卡因与消旋布比卡因用于骨科大手术脊髓麻醉的比较
Minerva Anestesiol. 2006 Jul-Aug;72(7-8):637-44.
10
A prospective study comparing the analgesic efficacy of levobupivacaine, ropivacaine and bupivacaine in pediatric patients undergoing caudal blockade.一项比较左旋布比卡因、罗哌卡因和布比卡因在接受骶管阻滞的儿科患者中的镇痛效果的前瞻性研究。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2005 Apr;15(4):301-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2004.01443.x.