Public Health Department, University of Turku, FI-20014 Turun yliopisto, Turku, Finland.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 Sep 14;12:96. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-96.
In high-income countries, great disparities exist in the organizational characteristics of maternity health services. In Finland, primary maternity care is provided at communal maternity health clinics (MHC). At these MHCs there are public health nurses and general practitioners providing care. The structure of services in MHCs varies largely. MHCs are maintained independently or merged with other primary health care sectors. A widely used organizational model of services is a combined maternity and child health clinic (MHC & CHC) where the same public health nurse takes care of the family from pregnancy until the child is at school age. The aim of this study was to determine how organizational model, MHC independent or combined MHC & CHC, influence on women's and their partners' service experiences.
A comparative, cross-sectional service evaluation survey was used. Women (N = 995) and their partners (N = 789) were recruited from the MHCs in the area of Turku University Hospital. Four months postpartum, the participants were asked to evaluate the content and amount of the MHC services via a postal questionnaire. Comparisons were made between the clients of the separate MHCs and the MHCs combined to the child health clinics.
Women who had used the combined MHC & CHCs generally evaluated services more positively than women who had used the separate MHCs. MHC's model was related to several aspects of the service which were evaluated "good" (the content of the service) or "much" (the amount of the service). Significant differences accumulated favoring the combined MHC & CHCs' model. Twelve aspects of the service were ranked more often as "good" or "much" by the parents who had used the combined MHC & CHC, only group activities regarding delivery were evaluated better by women who had used the separate MHCs.
Based on the women's and partners' experiences an organizational model of the combined MHC & CHC where the same nurse will take care of family during pregnancy and after birth of the child was preferred. This model also provides greater amount of home visits and peer support than the separate MHC.
在高收入国家,产妇保健服务的组织特征存在巨大差异。在芬兰,初级产妇保健由社区产妇保健诊所(MHC)提供。在这些 MHC 中,有公共卫生护士和全科医生提供护理。MHC 的服务结构差异很大。MHC 独立运作或与其他初级保健部门合并。一种广泛使用的服务组织模式是母婴健康诊所(MHC & CHC),在这种模式下,同一名公共卫生护士从怀孕到孩子上学年龄都照顾家庭。本研究旨在确定组织模式(独立的 MHC 或结合的 MHC & CHC)如何影响妇女及其伴侣的服务体验。
采用比较性、横断面服务评估调查。从图尔库大学医院地区的 MHC 招募了妇女(N=995)及其伴侣(N=789)。产后四个月,通过邮寄问卷的方式,让参与者评估 MHC 服务的内容和数量。将单独的 MHC 客户与与儿童健康诊所结合的 MHC 进行了比较。
使用结合的 MHC & CHC 的女性通常比使用单独 MHC 的女性对服务评价更为积极。MHC 的模式与服务的几个方面有关,这些方面被评价为“好”(服务内容)或“多”(服务数量)。结合的 MHC & CHC 模式有利于积累显著差异。有 12 个服务方面更常被认为是“好”或“多”,而使用单独 MHC 的女性则认为分娩相关的团体活动更好。
基于妇女和伴侣的经验,一个结合的 MHC & CHC 的组织模式,即同一名护士将在怀孕期间和孩子出生后照顾家庭,更受欢迎。这种模式还提供了比单独的 MHC 更多的家访和同伴支持。