Park Jun-Beom, Kim Namryang, Ko Youngkyung
Department of Periodontics, Seoul St Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
J Craniofac Surg. 2012 Sep;23(5):1552-8. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31825e3ba6.
Instrumentation to remove plaque from dental implants may cause damage to the implant surface, and previous studies that have evaluated the effects of the ultrasonic scalers and brushing in experimental settings reported that substantial changes were seen on implant surfaces after mechanical plaque removal. There is limited information on changes of the surface profile and roughness of sandblasted acid-etched (SLA) and machined titanium surfaces after treatment with different instruments in simulated clinical situations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of oral hygiene instruments including various types of ultrasonic tips in simulated clinical settings and brushing with dentifrice on machined and SLA titanium surface with confocal microscopy.
Both SLA and machined discs were treated with various ultrasonic scaler tips and brushing. Discs were either instrumented with 4 different ultrasonic scaler tips or brushed with dentifrice. The entire top surface of the discs was instrumented for a total of 40 seconds (20 seconds, 2 cycles). Brushing with dentifrice was done for 40 seconds. Roughness measurements were performed using a confocal microscope.
The change of surface structure after different treatment modalities could be observed with the naked eye when compared with the untreated surface (SLA and machined groups). In case of SLA surfaces, the 2 metal tips produced greater changes on the titanium surfaces when compared with the plastic ultrasonic tips and brushing. On the machined discs, scratch lines over the original surfaces could be observed from all ultrasonic metal and plastic tips, but 2 metal tips produced significant and definite scratches on the original disc surfaces.
This study showed the effects of different types of ultrasonic tips and brushing with dentifrice on both SLA and machined titanium surfaces in simulated clinical setting. Within the limits of our study, we suggest that metal or plastic ultrasonic scaler tips may be applied as usual to treat the SLA surface of dental abutment or fixture surfaces without increasing the irregularities on the titanium surfaces. However, in case of machined surfaces, ultrasonic metal tips cannot be recommended because the surface becomes rougher after treatment. In addition, brushing of titanium, regardless of surface treatment (SLA and machined surfaces), resulted in reduction of surface roughness. Meticulous oral hygiene with brushing must be reinforced for the patients with dental implants to maintain the exposed implant surface clean. Brushing with dentifrice may facilitate maintaining the exposed fixture surface clean by smoothening the surface.
用于清除牙种植体上菌斑的器械可能会对种植体表面造成损伤,之前在实验环境中评估超声洁治器和刷牙效果的研究报告称,机械清除菌斑后种植体表面出现了显著变化。在模拟临床情况下,使用不同器械处理后,喷砂酸蚀(SLA)和机械加工钛表面的表面轮廓和粗糙度变化的相关信息有限。本研究的目的是通过共聚焦显微镜评估包括各种类型超声头在内的口腔卫生器械在模拟临床环境中以及使用含氟牙膏刷牙对机械加工和SLA钛表面的影响。
SLA和机械加工的圆盘均用各种超声洁治器头进行处理并刷牙。圆盘要么用4种不同的超声洁治器头处理,要么用含氟牙膏刷牙。圆盘的整个顶面处理总时长为40秒(20秒,共2个周期)。用含氟牙膏刷牙40秒。使用共聚焦显微镜进行粗糙度测量。
与未处理的表面(SLA和机械加工组)相比,不同处理方式后表面结构的变化肉眼可见。对于SLA表面,与塑料超声头和刷牙相比,2种金属头在钛表面产生的变化更大。在机械加工的圆盘上,所有超声金属头和塑料头都能观察到原始表面上的划痕,但2种金属头在原始圆盘表面产生了明显且确定的划痕。
本研究显示了在模拟临床环境中不同类型超声头和使用含氟牙膏刷牙对SLA和机械加工钛表面的影响。在我们的研究范围内,我们建议金属或塑料超声洁治器头可照常用于处理牙基台或种植体表面的SLA表面,而不会增加钛表面的不平整。然而,对于机械加工表面,不推荐使用超声金属头,因为处理后表面会变得更粗糙。此外,无论表面处理方式如何(SLA和机械加工表面),刷牙都会使钛表面粗糙度降低。对于牙种植体患者,必须加强细致的刷牙口腔卫生措施,以保持暴露的种植体表面清洁。使用含氟牙膏刷牙可通过使表面光滑来促进保持暴露的种植体表面清洁。