Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, E5 Building, 1124 West Carson Street, Torrance, CA 90502, USA.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Mar;29(3):685-92. doi: 10.1007/s10554-012-0121-6. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
Regional ejection fraction (REF) provides important functional information of the left ventricular regional myocardium. We aimed to test the diagnostic accuracy of computerized REF analysis for detecting the ischemia and significant stenosis with multidetector CT angiography (MDCT). This is a retrospective study including 155 patients who underwent MDCT scans for evaluation of coronary artery disease. Among them, 83 patients also underwent SPECT imaging and invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Two groups of patients were defined: Control group with 0 coronary artery calcium and normal global and regional ventricular function, and comparison group. REF measurement was performed on all patients using computerized software. Control group REF measurements will be used as reference standard (mean-2SD REF/mean global ejection fraction) to define abnormal REF. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of REF in detecting perfusion defects (fixed and reversible) was 73, 80, 75 and 79 % respectively, in a patient based analysis of comparison group. The diagnostic accuracy of REF in predicting significant stenosis (>50 %) on ICA compared with SPECT was 72 versus 61 % and 85 versus 79 % in patient and vessel based analysis of comparison group, respectively. ROC curve analysis showed REF to be a better predictor of perfusion defects on SPECT compared with significant stenosis (>50 %) alone or stenosis combined with REF (P < 0.05). The computerized assessment of REF analysis is comparable to SPECT in predicting ischemia and a better predictor of significant stenosis than SPECT. This study also provides reference standard to define abnormal values.
区域性射血分数(REF)提供了左心室区域性心肌的重要功能信息。我们旨在测试计算机化 REF 分析检测多排 CT 血管造影(MDCT)中的缺血和显著狭窄的诊断准确性。这是一项回顾性研究,包括 155 名接受 MDCT 扫描以评估冠状动脉疾病的患者。其中,83 名患者还接受了 SPECT 成像和有创性冠状动脉造影(ICA)。将两组患者定义为:对照组无冠状动脉钙且整体和区域性心室功能正常,以及比较组。使用计算机软件对所有患者进行 REF 测量。对照组的 REF 测量值将作为参考标准(平均-2SD REF/平均整体射血分数)来定义异常 REF。在比较组的患者基础分析中,REF 在检测灌注缺陷(固定和可逆)中的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值分别为 73%、80%、75%和 79%。在比较组的患者和血管基础分析中,REF 在预测 ICA 上的显著狭窄(>50%)与 SPECT 相比,准确性分别为 72%比 61%和 85%比 79%。ROC 曲线分析显示,与单独的显著狭窄(>50%)或狭窄加 REF 相比,REF 是 SPECT 上灌注缺陷的更好预测因子(P<0.05)。计算机化 REF 分析评估与 SPECT 相比,在预测缺血方面具有可比性,并且是预测显著狭窄的更好预测因子。本研究还为定义异常值提供了参考标准。