Sir John Walsh Research Institute, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
J Endod. 2012 Oct;38(10):1387-90. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.06.034. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
The purpose of this study was to assess Enterococcus faecalis penetration into the dentin of the apical 3 mm and bacterial death after the application of either chlorhexidine or laser to root-end cavities.
Root canals of 60 single-rooted teeth were prepared. In part 1, cementum was removed semicircumferentially from 21 roots, and the smear layer was removed from 15 roots using 17% EDTA/cetrimide. Teeth were inoculated and incubated with E. faecalis for 10 days, rinsed, and live/dead stained. The effect of cementum and smear on bacterial penetration was assessed by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). In part 2, 39 teeth had root ends resected and cavities ultrasonically prepared. Inoculated roots were assigned to 1 of the following 3 groups: (1) root-end cavities irrigated with 0.2 % chlorhexidine, (2) root-end cavities irradiated with a laser for 20 seconds at 1.5 W, or (3) root-end cavities that received no treatment. Roots were live/dead stained, sectioned, and examined by CLSM. The depth of the bacterial penetration and bacterial survival were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test.
The presence of a smear layer and/or cementum did not significantly affect bacterial penetration. In root-end cavities, chlorhexidine was more effective than laser (P < .001), reducing bacterial viability by 93% versus 70% with a laser.
E. faecalis invaded the entire width of dentin in the apical 3 mm irrespective of the smear layer and/or cementum. Chlorhexidine was more effective than laser in disinfecting root-end cavities.
本研究旨在评估在根管根尖 3mm 区域,应用洗必泰或激光处理根管后,粪肠球菌进入牙本质的能力和细菌的死亡情况。
60 颗单根牙进行根管预备。在第 1 部分,21 颗牙的牙骨质被半环形去除,15 颗牙用 17% EDTA/洗必泰去除玷污层。牙被接种并与粪肠球菌孵育 10 天,冲洗,并用活/死染色。使用共聚焦激光扫描显微镜(CLSM)评估牙骨质和玷污层对细菌穿透的影响。在第 2 部分,39 颗牙的根尖被切除,并用超声制备根管。将接种的牙根分为以下 3 组之一:(1)用 0.2%洗必泰冲洗根管末端腔;(2)用 1.5W 激光照射根管末端腔 20 秒;(3)根管末端腔不做任何处理。对牙根进行活/死染色,切片,并用 CLSM 检查。使用 Mann-Whitney U 检验比较细菌穿透深度和细菌存活情况。
玷污层和/或牙骨质的存在并不显著影响细菌穿透。在根管末端腔中,洗必泰比激光更有效(P <.001),可将细菌活力降低 93%,而激光降低 70%。
粪肠球菌无论有无玷污层和/或牙骨质,均可侵入根尖 3mm 范围内牙本质的整个宽度。洗必泰比激光更有效地消毒根管末端腔。