Division of Endodontics, Department of Oral Biological and Medical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
J Endod. 2012 Oct;38(10):1376-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.06.035. Epub 2012 Aug 11.
Enterococcus faecalis is a species commonly isolated from persistent root canal infections. The purpose of this study was to compare the antibacterial effects of different disinfecting solutions on young and old E. faecalis biofilms in dentin canals using a novel dentin infection model and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM).
The bacteria were introduced into the dentinal tubules by centrifugation. After 1 day and 3 weeks of incubation, 40 infected dentin specimens were subjected to 1 and 3 minutes of exposure to disinfecting solutions, which included 2% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) (EMD Chemicals Inc, Darmstadt, Germany), 6% NaOCl, 2% chlorhexidine (CHX) (Sigma Chemical Co, St Louis, MO), and QMiX (Dentsply Tulsa Dental, Tulsa, OK). The proportions of dead and live bacteria inside the dentinal tubules after exposure to these disinfectants were assessed by CLSM using a LIVE/DEAD bacterial viability stain.
Significantly fewer bacteria were killed in the 3-week-old dentin biofilm than in the 1-day-old biofilm. Three minutes of exposure resulted in more dead bacteria than 1 minute of exposure for both biofilms in all experimental groups (P < .05). Six percent NaOCl and QMiX were the most effective disinfecting solutions against the young biofilm, whereas against the 3-week-old biofilm, 6% NaOCl was the most effective followed by QMiX. Two percent NaOCl was equally effective as 2% CHX. All the disinfecting agents killed significantly more bacteria than the sterile water used as a negative control (P < .05).
Within dentin canals, bacteria in established biofilms are less easily killed by endodontic medicaments than bacteria in young biofilms.
粪肠球菌是一种从持续性根管感染中分离出来的常见菌种。本研究的目的是使用一种新的牙本质感染模型和共聚焦激光扫描显微镜(CLSM)比较不同消毒溶液对牙本质管内新旧粪肠球菌生物膜的抗菌效果。
细菌通过离心引入牙本质小管。孵育 1 天和 3 周后,40 个感染牙本质标本分别用 1 分钟和 3 分钟的消毒溶液(包括 2%次氯酸钠(NaOCl)(EMD Chemicals Inc,达姆施塔特,德国)、6%NaOCl、2%洗必泰(CHX)(Sigma Chemical Co,圣路易斯,MO)和 QMiX(Dentsply Tulsa Dental,塔尔萨,OK))处理。使用 LIVE/DEAD 细菌活力染色剂通过 CLSM 评估暴露于这些消毒剂后牙本质小管内死菌和活菌的比例。
与 1 天龄生物膜相比,3 周龄生物膜中的细菌明显更难杀死。对于所有实验组,与 1 分钟暴露相比,3 分钟暴露导致两种生物膜中的活菌更少(P<.05)。对于年轻的生物膜,6%NaOCl 和 QMiX 是最有效的消毒溶液,而对于 3 周龄的生物膜,6%NaOCl 是最有效的,其次是 QMiX。2%NaOCl 与 2%CHX 的效果相当。与作为阴性对照的无菌水相比,所有消毒剂都能更有效地杀死更多的细菌(P<.05)。
在牙本质管内,与年轻生物膜中的细菌相比,定植生物膜中的细菌更难被根管药物杀死。