Suppr超能文献

不同最终冲洗程序对感染根管的有效性:一项体外评估。

Effectiveness of Different Final Irrigation Procedures on Infected Root Canals: An In Vitro Evaluation.

作者信息

Cîmpean Sanda Ileana, Pop-Ciutrila Ioana-Sofia, Matei Sebastian-Roberto, Colosi Ioana Alina, Costache Carmen, Nicula Gheorghe Zsolt, Badea Iulia Clara, Colceriu Burtea Loredana

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 33 Motilor Street, 400001 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Department of Molecular Sciences, Discipline of Microbiology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 6 Louis Pasteur Street, 400349 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2022 Sep 27;15(19):6688. doi: 10.3390/ma15196688.

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the antibacterial effect of three final irrigation protocols and to compare their ability to remove the smear layer and debris from the root canal. Methods: Sixty-three single-rooted human teeth were inoculated with Enterococcus faecalis for 14 days. The teeth were divided into a positive control group (N = 3) and three treatment groups (N = 20) as follows: final irrigation with saline solution (control group), irrigation with 5.25% NaOCl ultrasonically activated with EndoUltra (EU), standard needle irrigation with Qmix 2in1 (Qx) and irrigation with 5.25% NaOCl activated using SiroLaser Blue (SB). The bacterial load was evaluated by analyzing the colony-forming units (CFU/mL). Selected specimens were split longitudinally and examined using scanning electron microscopy in order to determine the presence of a smear layer and debris. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA and the Kruskal−Wallis rank-sum test. Results: Activation of NaOCl with EndoUltra or SiroLaser Blue was superior at reducing intracanal bacteria relative to standard needle irrigation with Qmix 2in1 solution (p < 0.05). Even though SiroLaser Blue showed the best results for removing the smear layer and debris, no significant differences were detected between the groups (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Final irrigation with 5.25% NaOCl ultrasonically activated using EndoUltra or SiroLaser Blue demonstrated a higher efficacy in bacterial reduction than standard needle irrigation with Qmix 2in1.

摘要

本研究旨在评估三种最终冲洗方案的抗菌效果,并比较它们从根管中清除玷污层和碎屑的能力。方法:将63颗单根人牙接种粪肠球菌14天。将牙齿分为阳性对照组(N = 3)和三个治疗组(N = 20),如下:用盐溶液进行最终冲洗(对照组)、用EndoUltra超声激活5.25%次氯酸钠进行冲洗(EU)、用Qmix 2in1进行标准针管冲洗(Qx)以及用SiroLaser Blue激活5.25%次氯酸钠进行冲洗(SB)。通过分析菌落形成单位(CFU/mL)评估细菌载量。将选定的标本纵向劈开,并用扫描电子显微镜检查,以确定玷污层和碎屑的存在情况。使用单因素方差分析和Kruskal-Wallis秩和检验进行统计分析。结果:相对于用Qmix 2in1溶液进行标准针管冲洗,用EndoUltra或SiroLaser Blue激活次氯酸钠在减少根管内细菌方面更具优势(p < 0.05)。尽管SiroLaser Blue在去除玷污层和碎屑方面显示出最佳效果,但各组之间未检测到显著差异(p > 0.05)。结论:用EndoUltra或SiroLaser Blue超声激活5.25%次氯酸钠进行最终冲洗在减少细菌方面比用Qmix 2in1进行标准针管冲洗具有更高的疗效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/466b/9571448/ecf63c06cfb3/materials-15-06688-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验