Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012 Nov;25(11):1195-203. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2012.08.007. Epub 2012 Sep 12.
Evaluation of myocardial deformation by two-dimensional speckle-tracking is useful for clinical and research purposes. However, differences may exist among different ultrasound machines, software packages, frame rates, and observers.
Thirty patients underwent echocardiography on both GE (Vivid 9; GE Vingmed Ultrasound AS, Horten, Norway) and Philips (iE33; Philips Ultrasound, Bothell, WA) ultrasound systems. From each study, two sets of images were stored in Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine format, optimized for strain evaluation: one set of images at the acquisition frame rate (55-90 frames/sec) and one set of images at a compressed frame rate of 30 frames/sec. Vendor-independent software (VIS; TomTec 2D Cardiac Performance Analysis, Munich, Germany) was used to measure strain in multiple directions and was compared with vendor-specific software (GE EchoPAC; GE Vingmed Ultrasound AS).
Intraobserver and interobserver coefficients of variation ranged from 5.5% to 8.7% for longitudinal strain, from 10.7% to 20.8% for circumferential, and from 15.3% to 33.4% for radial and transverse strain. Strain values obtained using VIS were comparable with those obtained using vendor-specific software for longitudinal strain, regardless of ultrasound machine or frame rate. For circumferential strain, a consistent large bias was observed between VIS and vendor-specific software, with higher values using VIS. Slightly higher strain values were observed by analysis at the acquisition frame rate compared with the low frame rate, but no consistent bias was observed between images from different vendors.
Global longitudinal strain consistently showed good reproducibility, while reproducibility was moderate for circumferential strain and poor in the radial direction. Retrospective analysis of legacy Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine data at 30 frames/sec can be reliably performed for longitudinal strain.
二维斑点追踪技术评估心肌变形对于临床和研究目的是有用的。然而,不同的超声仪器、软件包、帧率和观察者之间可能存在差异。
30 例患者分别在 GE(Vivid 9;GE Vingmed Ultrasound AS,Horten,挪威)和飞利浦(iE33;飞利浦超声,Bothell,WA)超声系统上进行超声心动图检查。从每个研究中,以数字成像和通信在医学格式存储两组图像,以优化应变评估:一组图像在采集帧率(55-90 帧/秒)和一组图像在压缩帧率 30 帧/秒。使用与供应商无关的软件(VIS;TomTec 2D 心脏性能分析,慕尼黑,德国)测量多个方向的应变,并与供应商特定的软件(GE EchoPAC;GE Vingmed Ultrasound AS)进行比较。
纵向应变的观察者内和观察者间变异系数范围为 5.5%至 8.7%,环向应变的变异系数范围为 10.7%至 20.8%,径向和横向应变的变异系数范围为 15.3%至 33.4%。使用 VIS 获得的应变值与使用供应商特定软件获得的纵向应变值相当,无论超声仪器或帧率如何。对于环向应变,VIS 与供应商特定软件之间始终存在较大的偏差,使用 VIS 时应变值较高。与低帧率相比,在采集帧率下进行分析时观察到应变值略高,但不同供应商的图像之间没有观察到一致的偏差。
纵向整体应变一致性表现出良好的可重复性,而环向应变的可重复性中等,径向应变的可重复性较差。可以可靠地对 30 帧/秒的遗留数字成像和通信在医学数据进行回顾性分析,以获得纵向应变。