• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

排除,而非摒弃:提升临床研究获益。

Excluded, not dismissed: enhancing benefit in clinical research.

机构信息

Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Trials. 2013 Jan;34(1):70-3. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.08.013. Epub 2012 Sep 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.cct.2012.08.013
PMID:22981957
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3525712/
Abstract

Participation in clinical research projects may allow an opportunity for early detection of covert diseases and subclinical disorders in asymptomatic volunteers from study-specific screening process. Exclusion of a potential participant due to failure to meet inclusion criteria eliminates any possibility of potential for research related benefit, as may exist for those that are deemed eligible and allowed to proceed with participation in the specific research study. Although the institutional bodies overseeing conduct of clinical research strive to ensure an ongoing scrutiny and prioritization of participants' wellbeing, we perceive that these mechanisms fall short as regards the interests of those volunteers who are subsequently excluded from participation in clinical research of relevance. While provision of ancillary care to address health concerns that are unmasked during the screening process may be an optimal strategy, the likelihood of successfully implementing this latter concept in current times of fiscal constraints is slim to nonexistent. Through this submission, we hope to initiate a dialogue within the research community regarding whether the current paradigm of conduct of clinical research be modified to include some degree of consideration for the screened out. We herein propose that for those volunteering for disease/disorder specific clinical research, some added degree of benefit can be assured to the screened out population through the provision of targeted health education or counseling.

摘要

参与临床研究项目可能为研究特定筛选过程中的无症状志愿者提供早期发现隐匿性疾病和亚临床疾病的机会。由于不符合纳入标准而排除潜在参与者,就消除了那些被认为符合条件并被允许参与特定研究的人所存在的潜在研究相关获益的可能性。尽管监督临床研究实施的机构机构努力确保对参与者的福祉进行持续审查和优先排序,但我们认为,这些机制在那些随后被排除在相关临床研究之外的志愿者的利益方面存在不足。虽然提供辅助护理以解决筛选过程中暴露的健康问题可能是一种最佳策略,但在当前财政拮据的情况下成功实施这一概念的可能性微乎其微。通过本提交,我们希望在研究界发起一场关于是否修改当前临床研究实施模式以纳入一定程度对被筛选出的人的考虑的对话。我们在此建议,对于那些自愿参与疾病/障碍特定临床研究的人,可以通过提供有针对性的健康教育或咨询,为被筛选出的人群提供一定程度的额外获益。

相似文献

1
Excluded, not dismissed: enhancing benefit in clinical research.排除,而非摒弃:提升临床研究获益。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2013 Jan;34(1):70-3. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.08.013. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
2
Fair subject selection in clinical research: formal equality of opportunity.临床研究中的公平受试者选择:机会的形式平等
J Med Ethics. 2016 Oct;42(10):672-7. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-103311. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
3
Guidelines, editors, pharma and the biological paradigm shift.指南、编辑、制药行业与生物学范式转变
Mens Sana Monogr. 2007 Jan;5(1):27-30. doi: 10.4103/0973-1229.32176.
4
Application of the rapid ethical assessment approach to enhance the ethical conduct of longitudinal population based female cancer research in an urban setting in Ethiopia.应用快速伦理评估方法,以提升埃塞俄比亚城市环境中基于人群的女性癌症纵向研究的伦理行为。
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Nov 14;19(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0328-8.
5
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明:临床研究监督
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29.
6
Practical steps to community engaged research: from inputs to outcomes.社区参与式研究的实用步骤:从投入到产出。
J Law Med Ethics. 2012 Winter;40(4):904-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2012.00719.x.
7
A problem with inclusion in learning disability research.学习障碍研究中的纳入问题。
Nurs Ethics. 2011 Sep;18(5):633-9. doi: 10.1177/0969733011404588. Epub 2011 Jun 3.
8
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.德国药品效益评估的程序和方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
Developing a new model for patient recruitment in mental health services: a cohort study using Electronic Health Records.开发心理健康服务患者招募新模式:一项使用电子健康记录的队列研究
BMJ Open. 2014 Dec 2;4(12):e005654. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005654.

本文引用的文献

1
Ethical issues in the conduct of research at a multidisciplinary clinic.多学科诊所开展研究中的伦理问题。
Semin Speech Lang. 2011 Nov;32(4):338-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1292759. Epub 2011 Dec 5.
2
Women's perceptions of polycystic ovary syndrome following participation in a clinical research study: implications for knowledge, feelings, and daily health practices.参与临床研究后女性对多囊卵巢综合征的认知:对知识、感受及日常健康行为的影响
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010 May;32(5):453-459. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34499-1.
3
The clinical investigator-subject relationship: a contextual approach.临床研究者与受试者的关系:一种情境化方法。
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2009 Dec 3;4:16. doi: 10.1186/1747-5341-4-16.
4
Patients' attitudes and preferences about participation and recruitment strategies in clinical trials.患者对临床试验中参与和招募策略的态度及偏好。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2009 Mar;84(3):243-7. doi: 10.4065/84.3.243.
5
Gradations of researchers' obligation to provide ancillary care for HIV/AIDS in developing countries.研究人员在发展中国家为艾滋病毒/艾滋病提供辅助治疗的义务等级。
Am J Public Health. 2007 Nov;97(11):1956-61. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.093658. Epub 2007 Sep 27.
6
Knowing your risk factors for coronary heart disease improves adherence to advice on lifestyle changes and medication.了解自己患冠心病的风险因素有助于提高对生活方式改变和药物治疗建议的依从性。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2006 Sep-Oct;21(5):E24-31. doi: 10.1097/00005082-200609000-00015.
7
Clinical ethics versus clinical research.临床伦理学与临床研究
Am J Bioeth. 2006 Jul-Aug;6(4):53-5; discussion W42-5. doi: 10.1080/15265160600755615.
8
The limitations of "vulnerability" as a protection for human research participants.“脆弱性”作为对人类研究参与者的一种保护措施的局限性。
Am J Bioeth. 2004 Summer;4(3):44-9. doi: 10.1080/15265160490497083.
9
Health care-related economic burden of the polycystic ovary syndrome during the reproductive life span.多囊卵巢综合征在生育期与医疗保健相关的经济负担。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005 Aug;90(8):4650-8. doi: 10.1210/jc.2005-0628. Epub 2005 Jun 8.
10
The ancillary-care responsibilities of medical researchers. An ethical framework for thinking about the clinical care that researchers owe their subjects.医学研究人员的辅助护理职责。关于研究人员对其研究对象应尽临床护理责任的伦理框架。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2004 Jan-Feb;34(1):25-33.