Smith Emily A, Schwartz Abigail L, Lucot James B
Pharmacology & Toxicology, Boonshoft School of Medicine, Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435, USA.
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2013 Jan-Feb;67(1):45-9. doi: 10.1016/j.vascn.2012.08.170. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
Analysis of catecholamines in small samples of urine is difficult and sensitive to stress. Current techniques require pooling of samples or expensive separation by double mass spectrometry. A method for extraction of unconjugated catecholamines in 20μL urine samples has been developed using alumina extraction prior to separation by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and electrochemical detection (ECD).
Three murine experiments tested the application of the procedure. In the first, collection occurred in the morning and evening prior to handling, and in the morning after three days of handling. In the second, passively obtained urine was compared to stressfully obtained urine in the same mice. Finally, basal collections were compared to urinary catecholamine levels 15 and 30min into novel cage stress. Urine was extracted alongside 2,3-dihydroxybenzoic acid (DHBA) internal standard via alumina and brought to pH 8.5 with tris buffer. The mixture underwent two wash steps for depuration and eluted with perchloric acid for analysis on HPLC with ECD.
This novel extraction method using low amounts of urine yielded 48% recovery in the samples and 60% recovery in the standard extraction on average. With a signal to noise ratio of 3:1, the limit of detection (LOD) of a standard is 1.2pg/mL, which allows for the detection of 3.6pg/mL in urine or 72fg in a 20μL sample. Thus resting catecholamine levels are 216 times higher than the LOD. Unconjugated norepinephrine and epinephrine levels were significantly increased 15min after novel cage stress and epinephrine remained elevated after 30min, but did not show significant differences when comparing collection time, handling exposure, or specific collection technique.
The technique is an effective measure for sympathetic activity in micro samples, with a limit of detection in the attomole range for 20μL samples.
对小份尿液样本中的儿茶酚胺进行分析既困难又易受应激影响。当前技术需要合并样本或采用昂贵的双质谱分离方法。已开发出一种在20微升尿液样本中提取未结合儿茶酚胺的方法,该方法在通过高效液相色谱(HPLC)和电化学检测(ECD)进行分离之前,先使用氧化铝萃取。
三项小鼠实验测试了该程序的应用。第一项实验中,在处理前的早晨和晚上以及处理三天后的早晨进行尿液收集。第二项实验中,将同一小鼠被动获取的尿液与应激获取的尿液进行比较。最后,将基础收集的尿液与新笼应激15分钟和30分钟后的尿儿茶酚胺水平进行比较。尿液与2,3 - 二羟基苯甲酸(DHBA)内标一起通过氧化铝萃取,并用三羟甲基氨基甲烷缓冲液调至pH 8.5。混合物经过两步洗涤以进行纯化,并用高氯酸洗脱,用于在配备ECD的HPLC上进行分析。
这种使用少量尿液的新型萃取方法在样本中的回收率平均为48%,在标准萃取中的回收率平均为60%。标准品的检测限(LOD)在信噪比为3:1时为1.2皮克/毫升,这使得在尿液中可检测到3.6皮克/毫升,或在20微升样本中检测到72飞克。因此,静息儿茶酚胺水平比检测限高216倍。新笼应激15分钟后,未结合的去甲肾上腺素和肾上腺素水平显著升高,30分钟后肾上腺素仍保持升高,但在比较收集时间、处理暴露或特定收集技术时未显示出显著差异。
该技术是微量样本中交感神经活动的有效测量方法,对于20微升样本,检测限在阿托摩尔范围内。