• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在农村联邦合格健康中心实施循证心理健康实践的伙伴关系:理论与方法

Partnership for implementation of evidence-based mental health practices in rural federally qualified health centers: theory and methods.

作者信息

Hunt Justin B, Curran Geoffrey, Kramer Teresa, Mouden Sip, Ward-Jones Susan, Owen Richard, Fortney John

机构信息

Division of Health Services Research, Psychiatric Research Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, USA.

出版信息

Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2012 Fall;6(3):389-98. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2012.0039.

DOI:10.1353/cpr.2012.0039
PMID:22982852
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3702033/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mental health and substance abuse are among the most commonly reported reasons for visits to Federally Qualified Health Centers (CHCs), yet only 6.5% of encounters are with on-site behavioral health specialists. Rural CHCs are significantly less likely to have on-site behavioral specialists than urban CHCs. Because of this lack of mental health specialists in rural areas, the most promising approach to improving mental health outcomes is to help rural primary care (PC) providers deliver evidence-based practices (EBPs). Despite the scope of these problems, no research has developed an effective implementation strategy for facilitating the adoption of mental health EBPs for rural CHCs. We sought to describe the conceptual components of an implementation partnership that focuses on the adaption and adoption of mental health EBPs by rural CHCs in Arkansas.

METHODS

We present a conceptual model that integrates seven separate frameworks: (1) Jones and Wells' Evidence-Based Community Partnership Model, (2) Kitson's Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARiHS) implementation framework, (3) Sackett's definition of evidence-based medicine, (4) Glisson's organizational social context model, (5) Rubenstein's Evidence-Based Quality Improvement (EBQI) facilitation process, (6) Glasgow's RE-AIM evaluation approach, and (7) Naylor's concept of shared decision making.

CONCLUSIONS

By integrating these frameworks into a meaningful conceptual model, we hope to develop a successful implementation partnership between an academic health center and small rural CHCs to improve mental health outcomes. Findings from this implementation partnership should have relevance to hundreds of clinics and millions of patients, and could help promote the sustained adoption of EBPs across rural America.

摘要

背景

心理健康和药物滥用是前往联邦合格健康中心(CHC)就诊最常被报告的原因之一,但只有6.5%的诊疗是与现场行为健康专家进行的。农村CHC配备现场行为专家的可能性明显低于城市CHC。由于农村地区缺乏心理健康专家,改善心理健康结果最有前景的方法是帮助农村初级保健(PC)提供者实施循证实践(EBP)。尽管存在这些问题,但尚无研究制定出有效的实施策略来促进农村CHC采用心理健康EBP。我们试图描述一种实施伙伴关系的概念组成部分,该伙伴关系专注于阿肯色州农村CHC对心理健康EBP的调整和采用。

方法

我们提出一个整合了七个独立框架的概念模型:(1)琼斯和韦尔斯的循证社区伙伴关系模型,(2)基特森的促进卫生服务研究实施行动(PARiHS)实施框架,(3)萨克特对循证医学的定义,(4)格利森的组织社会背景模型,(5)鲁宾斯坦的循证质量改进(EBQI)促进过程,(6)格拉斯哥的RE-AIM评估方法,以及(7)内勒的共同决策概念。

结论

通过将这些框架整合到一个有意义的概念模型中,我们希望在学术健康中心和农村小型CHC之间建立一个成功的实施伙伴关系,以改善心理健康结果。该实施伙伴关系的研究结果应与数百个诊所和数百万患者相关,并有助于促进全美国农村地区持续采用EBP。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1ed/3702033/60e6b410f09a/nihms476315f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1ed/3702033/60e6b410f09a/nihms476315f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1ed/3702033/60e6b410f09a/nihms476315f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Partnership for implementation of evidence-based mental health practices in rural federally qualified health centers: theory and methods.在农村联邦合格健康中心实施循证心理健康实践的伙伴关系:理论与方法
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2012 Fall;6(3):389-98. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2012.0039.
2
Urban and rural utilization of evidence-based practices for substance use and mental health disorders.城乡地区对物质使用和精神健康障碍循证实践的利用情况。
J Rural Health. 2014 Summer;30(3):292-9. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12068. Epub 2014 Apr 6.
3
The evolution of a community-based telepsychiatry program in rural Alabama: lessons learned-a brief report.阿拉巴马州农村社区精神病远程医疗项目的演变:经验教训——简要报告。
Community Ment Health J. 2013 Feb;49(1):101-5. doi: 10.1007/s10597-012-9493-2. Epub 2012 Feb 10.
4
Accelerating Research Collaborations Between Academia and Federally Qualified Health Centers: Suggestions Shaped by History.加速学术界与联邦合格健康中心之间的研究合作:历史塑造的建议
Public Health Rep. 2018 Jan/Feb;133(1):22-28. doi: 10.1177/0033354917742127. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
5
Rural community-academic partnership model for community engagement and partnered research.农村社区-学术伙伴关系模式促进社区参与和合作研究。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2013 Fall;7(3):281-90. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2013.0028.
6
Using implementation facilitation to implement primary care mental health integration via clinical video telehealth in rural clinics: protocol for a hybrid type 2 cluster randomized stepped-wedge design.利用实施促进策略,通过农村诊所的临床视频远程医疗实现初级保健心理健康一体化:混合 2 型集群随机分步楔形设计方案。
Implement Sci. 2019 Mar 21;14(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0875-5.
7
A Participatory Model for Evaluating a Multilevel Farmers' Market Intervention.一种用于评估多层次农贸市场干预措施的参与式模型。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2015 Winter;9(4):537-48. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2015.0074.
8
Enhancing Staffing In Rural Community Health Centers Can Help Improve Behavioral Health Care.加强农村社区卫生中心的人员配备有助于改善行为健康护理。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Dec;38(12):2061-2068. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00823.
9
Study to promote innovation in rural integrated telepsychiatry (SPIRIT): Rationale and design of a randomized comparative effectiveness trial of managing complex psychiatric disorders in rural primary care clinics.研究促进农村综合远程精神病学创新(SPIRIT):在农村初级保健诊所管理复杂精神疾病的随机对照效果试验的原理和设计。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Mar;90:105873. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.105873. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
10
Building the rural mental health system: from De Facto system to quality care.构建农村心理健康体系:从实际存在的体系到优质护理。
Annu Rev Nurs Res. 2008;26:143-73.

引用本文的文献

1
How does integrated knowledge translation work? A realist review.整合性知识转化如何发挥作用?一项实在论综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Aug 5;23(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01374-0.
2
"We want to be heard": A Qualitative Study of Mental Health Care Access among Patients of an Urban Federally Qualified Health Center.“我们希望被倾听”:一项关于城市联邦合格健康中心患者心理健康护理可及性的定性研究
Mental Health Sci. 2023 Dec;1(4):261-269. doi: 10.1002/mhs2.41. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
3
Designing an online intervention for adults with addictive eating: a qualitative integrated knowledge translation approach.

本文引用的文献

1
Creating a quality-improvement dialogue: utilizing knowledge from frontline staff, managers, and experts to foster health care quality improvement.开展质量改进对话:利用一线员工、管理人员和专家的知识促进医疗保健质量改进。
Qual Health Res. 2009 Feb;19(2):229-42. doi: 10.1177/1049732308329481. Epub 2008 Dec 17.
2
Harnessing experience: exploring the gap between evidence-based medicine and clinical practice.利用经验:探索循证医学与临床实践之间的差距。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Oct;14(5):707-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01009.x.
3
Making sense of primary care practices' capacity for change.
设计针对成瘾性进食的成年人的在线干预措施:一种定性综合知识转化方法。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 7;12(6):e060196. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060196.
4
The use of the PARIHS framework in implementation research and practice-a citation analysis of the literature.PARIHS 框架在实施研究和实践中的应用——文献引文分析。
Implement Sci. 2020 Aug 27;15(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01003-0.
5
Nudging New York: adaptive models and the limits of behavioral interventions to reduce no-shows and health inequalities.推动纽约:适应模型与行为干预减少失约和健康不平等的局限性
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr 26;20(1):363. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05097-6.
6
Fostering Partnerships with the Safety Net: An Evaluation of Kaiser Permanente's Community Ambassador Program in the Mid-Atlantic States.与安全网建立伙伴关系:对凯撒永久医疗集团在中大西洋各州的社区大使计划的评估。
Perm J. 2020;24. doi: 10.7812/TPP/19.010. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
7
A review and synthesis of frameworks for engagement in health research to identify concepts of knowledge user engagement.健康研究参与框架的综述与综合,以确定知识用户参与的概念。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Nov 21;19(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0838-1.
8
Implementation of evidence-based practices for complex mood disorders in primary care safety net clinics.在基层医疗安全网诊所中实施针对复杂情绪障碍的循证实践。
Fam Syst Health. 2018 Sep;36(3):267-280. doi: 10.1037/fsh0000357. Epub 2018 May 28.
9
Characteristics and Service Use of Medicare Beneficiaries Using Federally Qualified Health Centers.使用联邦合格健康中心的医疗保险受益人的特征与服务利用情况
Med Care. 2016 Aug;54(8):804-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000564.
10
"Someone's got to do it" - Primary care providers (PCPs) describe caring for rural women with mental health problems.“总得有人来做这件事”——初级保健提供者(PCP)描述了照顾有心理健康问题的农村妇女的情况。
Ment Health Fam Med. 2013 Dec;10(4):191-202.
理解初级保健机构的变革能力。
Transl Res. 2008 Nov;152(5):245-53. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2008.09.005. Epub 2008 Oct 11.
4
Organizational contexts of primary care approaches for managing problem drinking.管理问题饮酒的初级保健方法的组织背景。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2009 Jun;36(4):435-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2008.09.002. Epub 2008 Nov 12.
5
A process for developing an implementation intervention: QUERI Series.制定实施干预措施的流程:QUERI 系列。
Implement Sci. 2008 Mar 19;3:17. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-3-17.
6
Overview of the VA Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) and QUERI theme articles: QUERI Series.VA 质量提升研究倡议(QUERI)概述及 QUERI 主题文章:QUERI 系列。
Implement Sci. 2008 Feb 15;3:8. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-3-8.
7
Best practice implementation: lessons learned from 20 partnerships.最佳实践实施:从20个合作伙伴关系中吸取的经验教训。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2007 Dec;33(12 Suppl):16-26. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(07)33120-6.
8
Opportunities to meet challenges in rural prevention research: findings from an evolving community-university partnership model.农村预防研究中应对挑战的机遇:一种不断发展的社区-大学伙伴关系模式的研究结果
J Rural Health. 2007 Fall;23 Suppl(Suppl):42-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2007.00123.x.
9
Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARiHS framework: theoretical and practical challenges.利用 PARiHS 框架评估证据在实践中的成功实施:理论和实践挑战。
Implement Sci. 2008 Jan 7;3:1. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-3-1.
10
Assessing the organizational social context (OSC) of mental health services: implications for research and practice.评估心理健康服务的组织社会环境(OSC):对研究与实践的启示
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2008 Mar;35(1-2):98-113. doi: 10.1007/s10488-007-0148-5. Epub 2007 Dec 18.