Liu M, Kapadia A S, Etzel C J
Department of Epidemiology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030.
J Stat Theory Pract. 2010 Dec 1;4(4):845-855. doi: 10.1080/15598608.2010.10412022.
Although the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) is the most popular measure of the performance of prediction models, it has limitations, especially when it is used to evaluate the added discrimination of a new risk marker in an existing risk model. Pencina et al. (2008) proposed two indices, the net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), to supplement the improvement in the AUC (IAUC). Their NRI and IDI are based on binary outcomes in case-control settings, which do not involve time-to-event outcome. However, many disease outcomes are time-dependent and the onset time can be censored. Measuring discrimination potential of a prognostic marker without considering time to event can lead to biased estimates. In this paper, we extended the NRI and IDI to time-to-event settings and derived the corresponding sample estimators and asymptotic tests. Simulation studies showed that the time-dependent NRI and IDI have better performance than Pencina's NRI and IDI for measuring the improved discriminatory power of a new risk marker in prognostic survival models.
尽管受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)是预测模型性能最常用的指标,但它存在局限性,尤其是在用于评估现有风险模型中新风险标志物的额外鉴别力时。Pencina等人(2008年)提出了两个指标,即净重新分类改善(NRI)和综合鉴别改善(IDI),以补充AUC的改善情况(IAUC)。他们的NRI和IDI基于病例对照研究中的二元结局,不涉及事件发生时间结局。然而,许多疾病结局是时间依赖性的,发病时间可能被截尾。在不考虑事件发生时间的情况下衡量预后标志物的鉴别潜力可能会导致有偏差的估计。在本文中,我们将NRI和IDI扩展到事件发生时间的情况,并推导了相应的样本估计量和渐近检验。模拟研究表明,在测量新风险标志物在预后生存模型中的鉴别力改善方面,时间依赖性NRI和IDI比Pencina的NRI和IDI具有更好的性能。