Department of Clinical Psychology and Experimental Psychopathology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044111. Epub 2012 Sep 12.
Sex and disgust are basic, evolutionary relevant functions that are often construed as paradoxical. In general the stimuli involved in sexual encounters are, at least out of context strongly perceived to hold high disgust qualities. Saliva, sweat, semen and body odours are among the strongest disgust elicitors. This results in the intriguing question of how people succeed in having pleasurable sex at all. One possible explanation could be that sexual engagement temporarily reduces the disgust eliciting properties of particular stimuli or that sexual engagement might weaken the hesitation to actually approach these stimuli.
Participants were healthy women (n = 90) randomly allocated to one of three groups: the sexual arousal, the non-sexual positive arousal, or the neutral control group. Film clips were used to elicit the relevant mood state. Participants engaged in 16 behavioural tasks, involving sex related (e.g., lubricate the vibrator) and non-sex related (e.g., take a sip of juice with a large insect in the cup) stimuli, to measure the impact of sexual arousal on feelings of disgust and actual avoidance behaviour.
The sexual arousal group rated the sex related stimuli as less disgusting compared to the other groups. A similar tendency was evident for the non-sex disgusting stimuli. For both the sex and non-sex related behavioural tasks the sexual arousal group showed less avoidance behaviour (i.e., they conducted the highest percentage of tasks compared to the other groups).
This study has investigated how sexual arousal interplays with disgust and disgust eliciting properties in women, and has demonstrated that this relationship goes beyond subjective report by affecting the actual approach to disgusting stimuli. Hence, this could explain how we still manage to engage in pleasurable sexual activity. Moreover, these findings suggest that low sexual arousal might be a key feature in the maintenance of particular sexual dysfunctions.
性和厌恶是基本的、进化相关的功能,通常被认为是矛盾的。一般来说,性接触中涉及的刺激物,至少在脱离语境的情况下,被强烈认为具有高度的厌恶特质。唾液、汗水、精液和体味是最强的厌恶诱发物之一。这就引出了一个有趣的问题,即人们如何成功地进行愉悦的性行为。一种可能的解释是,性接触暂时降低了特定刺激物的厌恶诱发特性,或者性接触可能会削弱人们对接近这些刺激物的犹豫。
参与者为健康女性(n=90),随机分配到三个组之一:性唤起组、非性积极唤起组或中性对照组。使用电影片段来引发相关的情绪状态。参与者参与了 16 项行为任务,涉及与性相关的刺激物(例如,润滑振动器)和非性相关的刺激物(例如,在杯子里有一只大昆虫的情况下喝一口果汁),以测量性唤起对厌恶感和实际回避行为的影响。
性唤起组对与性相关的刺激物的评价比其他组的评价低。对于非性厌恶刺激物也存在类似的趋势。对于与性和非性相关的行为任务,性唤起组表现出较少的回避行为(即,与其他组相比,他们完成的任务百分比最高)。
本研究调查了性唤起如何与女性的厌恶和厌恶诱发特性相互作用,并表明这种关系超出了主观报告,影响了对厌恶刺激的实际接近。因此,这可以解释为什么我们仍然能够进行愉悦的性活动。此外,这些发现表明,低性唤起可能是维持特定性功能障碍的关键特征。