• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个性化规范反馈预防大学生酒精滥用的效果:所罗门三臂随机对照试验

Personalised normative feedback for preventing alcohol misuse in university students: Solomon three-group randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Instituto Superior de Saúde do Alto Ave, Póvoa de Lanhoso, Braga, Portugal.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44120. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044120. Epub 2012 Sep 12.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0044120
PMID:22984466
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3440433/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Young people tend to over-estimate peer group drinking levels. Personalised normative feedback (PNF) aims to correct this misperception by providing information about personal drinking levels and patterns compared with norms in similar aged peer groups. PNF is intended to raise motivation for behaviour change and has been highlighted for alcohol misuse prevention by the British Government Behavioural Insight Team. The objective of the trial was to assess the effectiveness of PNF with college students for the prevention of alcohol misuse.

METHODOLOGY

Solomon three-group randomised controlled trial. 1751 students, from 22 British Universities, allocated to a PNF group, a normal control group, or a delayed measurement control group to allow assessment of any measurement effects. PNF was provided by email. Participants completed online questionnaires at baseline, 6- and 12-months (only 12-months for the delayed measurement controls). Drinking behaviour measures were (i) alcohol disorders; (ii) frequency; (iii) typical quantity, (iv) weekly consumption; (v) alcohol-related problems; (vi) perceived drinking norms; and (vii) positive alcohol expectancies. Analyses focused on high-risk drinkers, as well as all students, because of research evidence for the prevention paradox in student drinkers.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Follow-up rates were low, with only 50% and 40% responding at 6- and 12-months, respectively, though comparable to similar European studies. We found no evidence for any systematic attrition bias. Overall, statistical analyses with the high risk sub-sample, and for all students, showed no significant effects of the intervention, at either time-point, in a completed case analysis and a multiple imputation analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence for the effectiveness of PNF for the prevention of alcohol misuse and alcohol-related problems in a UK student population.

REGISTRATION

Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN30784467.

摘要

背景

年轻人往往高估同龄人饮酒水平。个性化规范反馈(PNF)旨在通过提供个人饮酒水平和模式与同龄人群体规范的信息来纠正这种误解。PNF旨在提高行为改变的动机,并被英国政府行为洞察小组强调用于预防酒精滥用。试验的目的是评估 PNF 对大学生预防酒精滥用的有效性。

方法

所罗门三群组随机对照试验。来自英国 22 所大学的 1751 名学生被分配到 PNF 组、正常对照组或延迟测量对照组,以评估任何测量效果。PNF 通过电子邮件提供。参与者在基线、6 个月和 12 个月(仅对延迟测量对照组进行 12 个月)时完成在线问卷。饮酒行为测量包括:(i)酒精障碍;(ii)频率;(iii)典型数量;(iv)每周消耗量;(v)与酒精相关的问题;(vi)感知饮酒规范;和(vii)积极的酒精期望。分析侧重于高危饮酒者,以及所有学生,因为学生饮酒者中存在预防悖论的研究证据。

主要发现

随访率较低,只有 50%和 40%分别在 6 个月和 12 个月时回复,但与类似的欧洲研究相当。我们没有发现任何系统性失访偏倚的证据。总体而言,对高危亚组和所有学生进行的统计分析表明,在完成案例分析和多重插补分析中,干预在两个时间点均无显著效果。

结论

我们没有发现 PNF 对英国学生群体预防酒精滥用和与酒精相关问题的有效性证据。

注册

controlled-trials.com ISRCTN30784467。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a05a/3440433/38ab7dbaf476/pone.0044120.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a05a/3440433/38ab7dbaf476/pone.0044120.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a05a/3440433/38ab7dbaf476/pone.0044120.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Personalised normative feedback for preventing alcohol misuse in university students: Solomon three-group randomised controlled trial.个性化规范反馈预防大学生酒精滥用的效果:所罗门三臂随机对照试验
PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44120. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044120. Epub 2012 Sep 12.
2
Social norms information for alcohol misuse in university and college students.针对大学生酒精滥用问题的社会规范信息。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 29;2015(12):CD006748. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006748.pub4.
3
Social norms information for alcohol misuse in university and college students.针对大学生酒精滥用问题的社会规范信息。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 26;1:CD006748. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006748.pub3.
4
Booster effects and mechanisms of web-based personalised normative feedback alcohol intervention for college students: A pragmatic randomised controlled trial.基于网络的个性化规范反馈酒精干预对大学生的增强效应和机制:一项实用随机对照试验。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2024 Jul 1;260:111337. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.111337. Epub 2024 May 18.
5
The effectiveness of brief personalized normative feedback in reducing alcohol-related problems amongst university students: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.简短个性化规范反馈对减少大学生酒精相关问题的有效性:一项随机对照试验方案
BMC Public Health. 2008 Apr 10;8:113. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-113.
6
Components evaluation of a web-based personalized normative feedback intervention for alcohol use among college students: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial with a dismantling design.基于网络的个性化规范反馈干预大学生饮酒行为的组件评估:一项具有拆分设计的实用随机对照试验。
Addiction. 2020 Jun;115(6):1063-1074. doi: 10.1111/add.14923. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
7
The Role of Personalized Normative Feedback in the Efficacy of Brief Intervention Among Argentinian University Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial.个性化规范反馈在阿根廷大学生简短干预效果中的作用:一项随机对照试验。
Subst Use Misuse. 2024;59(12):1703-1710. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2024.2369165. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
8
RCT of web-based personalized normative feedback for college drinking prevention: are typical student norms good enough?基于网络的个性化规范反馈对大学生饮酒预防的随机对照试验:典型学生规范是否足够好?
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2013 Dec;81(6):1074-86. doi: 10.1037/a0034087. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
9
Indicated prevention for incoming freshmen: personalized normative feedback and high-risk drinking.针对即将入学的新生的预防措施:个性化规范反馈与高风险饮酒。 (注:原文表述似乎不太准确完整,正常逻辑可能是针对新生预防高风险饮酒的个性化规范反馈措施等,但按要求逐字翻译如上)
Addict Behav. 2007 Nov;32(11):2495-508. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.06.019. Epub 2007 Jun 28.
10
Randomized controlled trial of web-based decisional balance feedback and personalized normative feedback for college drinkers.针对大学生饮酒者的基于网络的决策平衡反馈和个性化规范反馈的随机对照试验。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2014 Nov;75(6):982-92. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2014.75.982.

引用本文的文献

1
The effectiveness of a mobile intervention to reduce young adults' alcohol consumption to not exceed low-risk drinking guidelines.一种移动干预措施将年轻人酒精摄入量降低至不超过低风险饮酒指南标准的有效性。
Front Digit Health. 2022 Dec 6;4:1016714. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.1016714. eCollection 2022.
2
A Mobile Intervention to Promote Low-Risk Drinking Habits in Young Adults: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.一项促进青年低风险饮酒习惯的移动干预措施:随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Jun 7;10(6):e29750. doi: 10.2196/29750.
3
Shyness and susceptibility to social influence: Stronger concordance between norms and drinking among shy individuals.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of generalizability, applicability and predictability (GAP) for evaluating external validity in studies of universal family-based prevention of alcohol misuse in young people: systematic methodological review of randomized controlled trials.评估普遍适用性、适用性和可预测性(GAP)以评估青少年普遍家庭为基础预防酗酒的研究中的外部有效性:随机对照试验的系统方法学综述。
Addiction. 2012 Sep;107(9):1570-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03867.x. Epub 2012 May 8.
2
Can simply answering research questions change behaviour? Systematic review and meta analyses of brief alcohol intervention trials.简单回答研究问题能否改变行为?简短酒精干预试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e23748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023748. Epub 2011 Oct 5.
3
害羞和易受社会影响:害羞个体的规范和饮酒之间更一致。
Addict Behav. 2021 Aug;119:106922. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106922. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
4
Asking questions changes health-related behavior: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.提问可改变与健康相关的行为:更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Jul;123:59-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.03.014. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
5
Cognitive-Affective Change Mechanisms in Personalized Normative Feedback via the Articulated Thoughts in Simulated Situations Paradigm.通过模拟情境中的表达思想范式进行个性化规范反馈中的认知-情感变化机制。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 21;17(3):690. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030690.
6
Incorporating Writing into a Personalized Normative Feedback Intervention to Reduce Problem Drinking Among College Students.将写作融入个性化规范反馈干预中,以减少大学生的问题性饮酒。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2019 May;43(5):916-926. doi: 10.1111/acer.13995. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
7
Social influences normalize gambling-related harm among higher risk gamblers.社会影响使高风险赌徒的赌博相关伤害正常化。
J Behav Addict. 2018 Dec 1;7(4):1100-1111. doi: 10.1556/2006.7.2018.139.
8
Personalised digital interventions for reducing hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption in community-dwelling populations.针对社区居住人群减少有害和危险饮酒行为的个性化数字干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 25;9(9):CD011479. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011479.pub2.
9
Commentary: The Impact of Asking Intention or Self-Prediction Questions on Subsequent Behavior: A Meta-Analysis.评论:询问意图或自我预测问题对后续行为的影响:一项元分析。
Front Psychol. 2016 Jun 9;7:879. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00879. eCollection 2016.
10
Social norms information for alcohol misuse in university and college students.针对大学生酒精滥用问题的社会规范信息。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 29;2015(12):CD006748. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006748.pub4.
Universal multi-component prevention programs for alcohol misuse in young people.针对年轻人酒精滥用问题的通用多成分预防项目。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Sep 7(9):CD009307. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009307.
4
Alcohol use, heavy episodic drinking and subsequent problems among adolescents in 23 European countries: does the prevention paradox apply?23 个欧洲国家青少年的饮酒行为、重度周期性饮酒和随后出现的问题:预防悖论是否适用?
Addiction. 2012 Jan;107(1):71-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03537.x. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
5
Electronic screening and brief intervention for risky drinking in Swedish university students--a randomized controlled trial.电子筛查和简短干预对瑞典大学生危险饮酒的作用:一项随机对照试验。
Addict Behav. 2011 Jun;36(6):654-659. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.01.015. Epub 2011 Jan 20.
6
Strategy for intention to treat analysis in randomised trials with missing outcome data.随机试验中缺失结局数据的意向治疗分析策略。
BMJ. 2011 Feb 7;342:d40. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d40.
7
Judging nudging: can nudging improve population health?评判助推:助推能否改善群体健康?
BMJ. 2011 Jan 25;342:d228. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d228.
8
Providing web-based feedback and social norms information to reduce student alcohol intake: a multisite investigation.提供基于网络的反馈和社会规范信息以减少学生饮酒量:一项多地点调查
J Med Internet Res. 2010 Dec 19;12(5):e59. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1461.
9
Reductions in drinking and alcohol-related harms reported by first-year college students taking an online alcohol education course: a randomized trial.参与在线酒精教育课程的大一学生报告的饮酒量减少和与酒精相关的危害减少:一项随机试验。
J Health Commun. 2010 Oct;15(7):805-19. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2010.514032.
10
Randomized controlled trial of proactive web-based alcohol screening and brief intervention for university students.针对大学生的基于网络的主动式酒精筛查与简短干预的随机对照试验。
Arch Intern Med. 2009 Sep 14;169(16):1508-14. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.249.