Suppr超能文献

间歇性气动压迫与手法淋巴引流治疗乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿的比较。

Comparison of intermittent pneumatic compression with manual lymphatic drainage for treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema.

作者信息

Gurdal Sibel Ozkan, Kostanoglu Alis, Cavdar Ikbal, Ozbas Ayfer, Cabioglu Neslihan, Ozcinar Beyza, Igci Abdullah, Muslumanoglu Mahmut, Ozmen Vahit

机构信息

Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Namik Kemal University, Tekirdag, Turkey.

出版信息

Lymphat Res Biol. 2012 Sep;10(3):129-35. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2012.0002.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this prospective controlled study was to assess the efficacy of two different combination treatment modalities of lymphedema (LE). Manual lymphatic drainage (MLD) and compression bandage combination (complex decongestive therapy) have been compared with intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) plus self-lymphatic drainage (SLD).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Both MLD with compression bandage (complex decongestive therapy) group (Group I, n=15) and IPC with SLD group (Group II, n=15) received treatment for LE 3 days in a week and every other day for 6 weeks. Arm circumferences were measured before and the 1st, 3rd, and 6th weeks of the treatment. EORTC-QLQ and ASES-tests were performed to assess the quality of life before and after 6 week-treatment. Patients in both groups had similar demographic and clinical characteristics. Even though both treatment modalities resulted in significant decrease in the total arm volume (12.2% decrease in Group II and 14.9% decrease in Group I) (p<0.001), no significant difference (p=0.582) was found between those two groups. Similarly, ASES scores were significantly (p=0.001) improved in both Group I and II without any significant difference between the groups. While emotional functioning, fatigue, and pain scores were significantly improved in both groups, global health status, functional and cognitive functioning scores appeared to be improved only in patients of group I.

CONCLUSIONS

Different treatment modalities consisting of MLD and compression bandage(complex decongestive therapy) or IPC and SLD appear to be effective in the treatment of LE with similar therapeutic efficacy in patients with breast cancer. However, combination modalities including IPC and SLD may be the preferred choices for their applicability at home.

摘要

背景

这项前瞻性对照研究的目的是评估两种不同的淋巴水肿(LE)联合治疗方式的疗效。将手动淋巴引流(MLD)与加压绷带联合治疗(综合消肿治疗)与间歇性气动压迫(IPC)加自我淋巴引流(SLD)进行了比较。

方法与结果

MLD联合加压绷带(综合消肿治疗)组(第一组,n = 15)和IPC联合SLD组(第二组,n = 15)每周接受3天的LE治疗,每隔一天治疗一次,共6周。在治疗前以及治疗第1、3和6周测量手臂周长。在6周治疗前后进行欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷(EORTC-QLQ)和美国肩肘外科医师学会(ASES)测试以评估生活质量。两组患者的人口统计学和临床特征相似。尽管两种治疗方式均导致手臂总体积显著减少(第二组减少12.2%,第一组减少14.9%)(p<0.001),但两组之间未发现显著差异(p = 0.582)。同样,第一组和第二组的ASES评分均显著改善(p = 0.001),两组之间无显著差异。虽然两组的情绪功能、疲劳和疼痛评分均显著改善,但整体健康状况、功能和认知功能评分似乎仅在第一组患者中有所改善。

结论

由MLD和加压绷带(综合消肿治疗)或IPC和SLD组成的不同治疗方式在治疗乳腺癌患者的LE方面似乎有效,且疗效相似。然而,包括IPC和SLD的联合治疗方式因其在家中的适用性可能是首选。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验