• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

情境可以解释愤怒对冒险行为产生的不同影响。

Context explains divergent effects of anger on risk taking.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, NortheasternUniversity, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

出版信息

Emotion. 2012 Dec;12(6):1196-9. doi: 10.1037/a0029788. Epub 2012 Sep 17.

DOI:10.1037/a0029788
PMID:22985339
Abstract

The emotion anger is typically associated with increased risk taking. However, anger also produces increased probability estimates that emotionally congruent negative events will occur. This latter finding suggests that the general assumption that anger always increases risky decision making may be subject to caveat. The context of a risk-taking opportunity may dictate whether anger leads to greater or lesser acceptance of risk as a function of which component of the emotional state (i.e., affective or conceptual) is salient. In the experiment reported, participants completed one of two versions of a risk-taking measure that differ according to whether they evoke decisions based on affective feelings or more deliberate reasoning. Results demonstrated that angry participants made riskier decisions than their neutral counterparts under conditions less susceptible to the use of affective information, but made less risky decisions under conditions that favored the use of affective information. The importance of studying emotional states as multifaceted and contextualized phenomenon is discussed.

摘要

愤怒通常与增加冒险行为有关。然而,愤怒也会增加情绪一致的负面事件发生的可能性估计。这一发现表明,愤怒总是会增加冒险决策的一般假设可能需要注意。冒险机会的背景可能会决定愤怒是导致更大还是更小的风险接受程度,这取决于情绪状态的哪个组成部分(即情感或概念)更为突出。在报告的实验中,参与者完成了两种风险决策测量的其中一种,这两种测量方法的区别在于它们是基于情感感受还是更慎重的推理来做出决策。结果表明,在不太容易使用情感信息的情况下,愤怒的参与者比他们的中性对照组做出了更冒险的决策,但在有利于使用情感信息的情况下,他们做出了风险较小的决策。讨论了将情绪状态作为多方面和情境化现象进行研究的重要性。

相似文献

1
Context explains divergent effects of anger on risk taking.情境可以解释愤怒对冒险行为产生的不同影响。
Emotion. 2012 Dec;12(6):1196-9. doi: 10.1037/a0029788. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
2
Do (un)certainty appraisal tendencies reverse the influence of emotions on risk taking in sequential tasks?不确定性评估倾向是否会反转情绪对序列任务中风险承担的影响?
Cogn Emot. 2012;26(3):568-76. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2011.602237. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
3
Effects of anger and sadness on attentional patterns in decision making: an eye-tracking study.愤怒和悲伤对决策中注意力模式的影响:一项眼动追踪研究。
Psychol Rep. 2014 Feb;114(1):50-67. doi: 10.2466/01.04.PR0.114k14w3.
4
Trait anger and anger expression style in children's risky decisions.儿童冒险决策中的特质愤怒与愤怒表达风格
Aggress Behav. 2009 Jan-Feb;35(1):14-23. doi: 10.1002/ab.20285.
5
Framing effects and risk-sensitive decision making.框架效应与风险敏感决策。
Br J Psychol. 2012 Feb;103(1):83-97. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02047.x. Epub 2011 Jun 15.
6
The emotionally intelligent decision maker: emotion-understanding ability reduces the effect of incidental anxiety on risk taking.情绪型决策者:情绪理解能力降低了偶然焦虑对风险承担的影响。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Jan 1;24(1):48-55. doi: 10.1177/0956797612450031. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
7
Decision making under risk and under ambiguity in Parkinson's disease.帕金森病中风险和模糊情境下的决策制定
Neuropsychologia. 2009 Jul;47(8-9):1901-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.02.034. Epub 2009 Mar 9.
8
Predicting risky and angry driving as a function of gender.根据性别预测危险驾驶和愤怒驾驶行为。
Accid Anal Prev. 2007 May;39(3):536-45. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.09.010. Epub 2006 Nov 7.
9
Emotion regulation and risk taking: predicting risky choice in deliberative decision making.情绪调节与冒险行为:预测审慎决策中的风险选择。
Cogn Emot. 2013;27(2):326-34. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2012.707642. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
10
Positive emotional context eliminates the framing effect in decision-making.积极的情绪背景消除了决策中的框架效应。
Emotion. 2012 Oct;12(5):926-31. doi: 10.1037/a0026788. Epub 2012 Feb 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Incidental affect influences choice preference among competing alternatives in a modified Affect Misattribution Procedure.偶然情感在改良的情感错误归因程序中影响竞争选项间的选择偏好。
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 30;14(1):32129. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83935-x.
2
A multinational analysis of how emotions relate to economic decisions regarding time or risk.一项关于情绪如何与时间或风险的经济决策相关的跨国分析。
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Nov;8(11):2139-2155. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-01927-3. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
3
The continuous and changing impact of affect on risky decision-making.
情感对风险决策的持续和变化的影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 23;12(1):10613. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14810-w.
4
The influence of fear on risk taking: a meta-analysis.恐惧对冒险行为的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Cogn Emot. 2020 Sep;34(6):1143-1159. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2020.1731428. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
5
Decision Making Under Objective Risk Conditions-a Review of Cognitive and Emotional Correlates, Strategies, Feedback Processing, and External Influences.客观风险条件下的决策——认知和情绪相关因素、策略、反馈处理和外部影响的综述。
Neuropsychol Rev. 2015 Jun;25(2):171-98. doi: 10.1007/s11065-015-9285-x. Epub 2015 Apr 18.
6
Neural correlates of expected risks and returns in risky choice across development.不同发育阶段风险选择中预期风险与回报的神经关联
J Neurosci. 2015 Jan 28;35(4):1549-60. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1924-14.2015.