Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Germany.
Neuroimage. 2013 Jan 1;64:601-15. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.09.020. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
Response inhibition is disturbed in several disorders sharing impulse control deficits as a core symptom. Since response inhibition is a cognitively and neurally multifaceted function which has been shown to rely on differing neural subprocesses and neurotransmitter systems, further differentiation to define neurophysiological endophenotypes is essential. Response inhibition may involve at least three separable cognitive subcomponents, i.e. interference inhibition, action withholding, and action cancelation. Here, we introduce a novel paradigm - the Hybrid Response Inhibition task - to disentangle interference inhibition, action withholding and action cancelation and their neural subprocesses within one task setting during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). To validate the novel task, results were compared to a battery of separate, standard response inhibition tasks independently capturing these subcomponents and subprocesses. Across all subcomponents, mutual activation was present in the right inferior frontal cortex (rIFC), pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA) and parietal regions. Interference inhibition revealed stronger activation in pre-motor and parietal regions. Action cancelation resulted in stronger activation in fronto-striatal regions. Our results show that all subcomponents share a common neural network and thus all constitute different subprocesses of response inhibition. Subprocesses, however, differ to the degree of regional involvement: interference inhibition relies more pronouncedly on a fronto-parietal-pre-motor network suggesting its close relation to response selection processes. Action cancelation, in turn, is more strongly associated with the fronto-striatal pathway implicating it as a late subcomponent of response inhibition. The new paradigm reliably captures three putatively subsequent subprocesses of response inhibition and might be a promising tool to differentially assess disturbed neural networks in disorders showing impulse control deficits.
反应抑制在几种共享冲动控制缺陷作为核心症状的障碍中受到干扰。由于反应抑制是一种认知和神经上多方面的功能,已经被证明依赖于不同的神经子过程和神经递质系统,因此进一步区分以定义神经生理内表型是至关重要的。反应抑制可能涉及至少三个可分离的认知子成分,即干扰抑制、动作抑制和动作取消。在这里,我们引入了一种新的范式——混合反应抑制任务——在功能磁共振成像(fMRI)中在一个任务设置下分离干扰抑制、动作抑制和动作取消及其神经子过程。为了验证新任务,结果与一组单独的、独立捕获这些子成分和子过程的标准反应抑制任务进行了比较。在所有子成分中,右额下回(rIFC)、辅助运动前区(pre-SMA)和顶叶区域都存在相互激活。干扰抑制在运动前和顶叶区域显示出更强的激活。动作取消导致额纹状体区域的激活更强。我们的结果表明,所有子成分都共享一个共同的神经网络,因此都构成了反应抑制的不同子过程。然而,子过程在区域参与程度上存在差异:干扰抑制更强烈地依赖于额顶-运动前-顶叶网络,表明其与反应选择过程密切相关。另一方面,动作取消与额纹状体通路的联系更紧密,表明其是反应抑制的一个较晚的子成分。新的范式可靠地捕捉到反应抑制的三个假定的后续子过程,可能是评估表现出冲动控制缺陷的障碍中受损神经网络的有前途的工具。