Department of Internal Medicine, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Med Educ Online. 2012 Sep 13;17(1):17242. doi: 10.3402/meo.v17i0.17242.
Little is known about the characteristics of mentoring relationships formed between faculty and medical students. Individual mentoring relationships of clinical medical students at Munich Medical School were characterized quantitatively and qualitatively.
All students signing up for the mentoring program responded to a questionnaire on their expectations (n = 534). Mentees were asked to give feedback after each of their one-on-one meetings (n = 203). A detailed analysis of the overall mentoring process and its characteristics was performed. For qualitative text analysis, free-text items were analyzed and categorized by two investigators. Quantitative analysis was performed using descriptive statistics and Wilcoxon-test to assess differences in grades between students with and without mentors.
High-performing students were significantly more likely to participate in the mentoring program (p<0.001). Topics primarily discussed include the mentee's personal goals (65.5%), career planning (59.6%), and experiences abroad (57.6%). Mentees mostly perceived their mentors as counselors (88.9%), providers of ideas (85.0%), and role models (73.3%). Mentees emphasized the positive impact of the mentoring relationship on career planning (77.2%) and research (75.0%).
Medical students with strong academic performance as defined by their grades are more likely to participate in formal mentoring programs. Mentoring relationships between faculty and medical students are perceived as a mutually satisfying and effective instrument for key issues in medical students' professional development.
Mentoring relationships are a highly effective means of enhancing the bidirectional flow of information between faculty and medical students. A mentoring program can thus establish a feedback loop enabling the educational institution to swiftly identify and address issues of medical students.
关于教师和医学生之间形成的指导关系的特点知之甚少。本研究对慕尼黑医科大学临床医学生的个体指导关系进行了定量和定性描述。
报名参加指导计划的所有学生都回答了一份关于他们期望的问卷(n=534)。指导结束后,每位学员都要对一对一会议进行反馈(n=203)。对整个指导过程及其特征进行了详细分析。对于定性文本分析,通过两位研究人员对自由文本项进行分析和分类。使用描述性统计和 Wilcoxon 检验对有导师和无导师学生的成绩进行差异分析。
表现优异的学生更有可能参加指导计划(p<0.001)。讨论的主题主要包括学员的个人目标(65.5%)、职业规划(59.6%)和海外经历(57.6%)。学员大多将导师视为顾问(88.9%)、创意提供者(85.0%)和榜样(73.3%)。学员强调指导关系对职业规划(77.2%)和研究(75.0%)的积极影响。
成绩优异的医学生更有可能参加正式的指导计划。教师和医学生之间的指导关系被认为是促进医学生专业发展的有效工具。
指导关系是增强教师和医学生之间信息双向流动的有效手段。因此,指导计划可以建立一个反馈循环,使教育机构能够迅速识别和解决医学生的问题。