• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在接受引产的产妇活跃期停止使用催产素。

Oxytocin discontinuation during active labor in women who undergo labor induction.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, PA, USA.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Dec;207(6):471.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.08.035. Epub 2012 Sep 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2012.08.035
PMID:22989707
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is an increase in the cesarean delivery rate in women who undergo induction when oxytocin is discontinued in the active phase of labor.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial of women who underwent induction of labor at term; they were assigned randomly to either routine oxytocin use (routine) or oxytocin discontinuation (DC) once in active labor. Analysis was by intention to treat.

RESULTS

Two hundred fifty-two patients were eligible for study analysis: 127 patients were assigned randomly to the routine group and 125 patients were assigned randomly to the DC group. Cesarean delivery rate was similar between the groups (routine, 25.2% [n = 32] vs the DC group, 19.2% [n = 24]; P = .25). There was a higher chorioamnionitis rate and slightly longer active phase in those women who were assigned to the DC group. In adjusted analysis, the rate of chorioamnionitis was not different by randomization group but was explained by the duration of membrane rupture and intrauterine pressure catheter placement.

CONCLUSION

Discontinuation of oxytocin in active labor after labor induction does not increase the cesarean delivery rate significantly.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定在活跃期停止催产素时行引产的女性中,剖宫产率是否增加。

研究设计

我们对足月行引产的女性进行了前瞻性随机对照试验;将她们随机分为常规催产素使用组(常规组)或活跃期一旦使用催产素即停止(DC 组)。分析采用意向治疗。

结果

共有 252 名患者符合研究分析条件:127 名患者被随机分配至常规组,125 名患者被随机分配至 DC 组。两组剖宫产率相似(常规组,25.2%[n=32] vs DC 组,19.2%[n=24];P=0.25)。与常规组相比,被分配至 DC 组的女性绒毛膜羊膜炎发生率更高,活跃期略长。在调整分析中,随机分组与绒毛膜羊膜炎发生率无差异,但与胎膜破裂时间和宫内压力导管放置时间有关。

结论

活跃期停止催产素不会显著增加剖宫产率。

相似文献

1
Oxytocin discontinuation during active labor in women who undergo labor induction.在接受引产的产妇活跃期停止使用催产素。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Dec;207(6):471.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.08.035. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
2
Prospective randomized study of oxytocin discontinuation after the active stage of labor is established.分娩活跃期建立后缩宫素停用的前瞻性随机研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2007 Dec;33(6):799-803. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2007.00659.x.
3
Discontinuation of oxytocin in the active phase of labor.在产程活跃期停用缩宫素。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(2):172-7. doi: 10.1080/00016340802649816.
4
Labor induction in women with an unfavorable Bishop score: randomized controlled trial of intrauterine Foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin infusion versus Foley catheter with extra-amniotic saline infusion with concurrent oxytocin infusion.宫颈Bishop评分不佳的女性引产:宫内Foley导管联合缩宫素输注与Foley导管联合羊膜外生理盐水输注并联合缩宫素输注的随机对照试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jul;191(1):225-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.12.039.
5
A prospective randomized study comparing misoprostol and oxytocin for premature rupture of membranes at term.一项比较米索前列醇和缩宫素用于足月胎膜早破的前瞻性随机研究。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2006 May;19(5):283-7. doi: 10.1080/14767050600589807.
6
Predictors of cesarean section following elective post-dates induction of labor in nullipara with uncomplicated singleton vertex pregnancies.无合并症的单胎头位初产妇晚期选择性引产术后剖宫产的预测因素。
Saudi Med J. 2006 Aug;27(8):1167-72.
7
Transcervical Foley catheter with and without extraamniotic saline infusion for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.经宫颈 Foley 导管联合或不联合羊膜外生理盐水输注用于引产:一项随机对照试验
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Sep;110(3):558-65. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000278077.30890.87.
8
Induction of labor with oxytocin increases cesarean section rate as compared with oxytocin for augmentation of spontaneous labor in nulliparous parturients controlled for lumbar epidural analgesia.在接受腰段硬膜外镇痛的初产妇中,与使用缩宫素加强自然分娩相比,使用缩宫素引产会增加剖宫产率。
J Clin Anesth. 2004 Sep;16(6):411-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2003.11.004.
9
Induction of labor compared with expectant management for prelabor rupture of the membranes at term. TERMPROM Study Group.足月胎膜早破引产与期待治疗的比较。足月胎膜早破研究组
N Engl J Med. 1996 Apr 18;334(16):1005-10. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199604183341601.
10
Randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: misoprostol vs oxytocin.引产术前宫颈成熟的随机试验:米索前列醇与缩宫素对比
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Sep;199(3):305.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.07.014.

引用本文的文献

1
Continued versus discontinued oxytocin after the active phase of labor: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.产程活跃期后继续使用催产素与停止使用催产素的比较:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2022 May 2;17(5):e0267461. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267461. eCollection 2022.
2
Continued versus discontinued oxytocin stimulation in the active phase of labour (CONDISOX): double blind randomised controlled trial.在产程活跃期持续与停止催产素刺激(CONDISOX):双盲随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2021 Apr 14;373:n716. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n716.
3
Reducing neonatal morbidity by discontinuing oxytocin during the active phase of first stage of labor: a multicenter randomized controlled trial STOPOXY.
通过在第一产程活跃期末停止使用催产素来降低新生儿发病率:一项多中心随机对照试验 STOPOXY。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Oct 20;20(1):640. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03331-x.
4
CONDISOX- continued versus discontinued oxytocin stimulation of induced labour in a double-blind randomised controlled trial.CONDIsox- 持续与停止催产素刺激引产的双盲随机对照试验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Sep 2;19(1):320. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2461-x.
5
Discontinuation of intravenous oxytocin in the active phase of induced labour.引产活跃期静脉滴注缩宫素的停用
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 20;8(8):CD012274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012274.pub2.
6
High-dose versus low-dose oxytocin infusion regimens for induction of labour at term.足月引产时高剂量与低剂量缩宫素输注方案的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 9;2014(10):CD009701. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009701.pub2.