• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大鼠(褐家鼠)和鸽子(原鸽)对与食物的距离敏感,但只有大鼠在距离增加时会索要更多食物。

Rats (Rattus norvegicus) and pigeons (Columbia livia) are sensitive to the distance to food, but only rats request more food when distance increases.

作者信息

Reilly Mark P, Posadas-Sánchez Diana, Kettle Lauren C, Killeen Peter R

机构信息

Arizona State University, United States.

出版信息

Behav Processes. 2012 Nov;91(3):236-43. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2012.09.002. Epub 2012 Sep 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.beproc.2012.09.002
PMID:22989930
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3532893/
Abstract

Three experiments investigated foraging by rats and pigeons. In Experiment 1, each response on a manipulandum delivered food to a cup, with the distance between the manipulandum and the cup varying across conditions. The number of responses made before traveling to collect and eat the food increased with distance for rats, but not for pigeons. In Experiment 2, two manipulanda were placed at different distances from a fixed food source; both pigeons and rats preferentially used the manipulandum closest to the food source. Experiment 3 was a systematic replication of Experiment 1 with pigeons. In different conditions, each peck on the left key increased the upcoming hopper duration by 0.5, 1.5 or 2.5s. Completing a ratio requirement on the right key of 1, 4, 8, 16 or 32 pecks, depending on the condition, then produced the food hopper for a duration that depended on the number of prior left pecks. As the ratio requirement increased on the right key, pigeons responded more on the left key and earned more food. Overall, the results replicate previous research, underlining similarities and differences between these species. The results are discussed in terms of optimal foraging, reinforcer sensitivity and delay discounting.

摘要

三项实验研究了大鼠和鸽子的觅食行为。在实验1中,对操作柄的每次反应都会将食物送到一个杯子中,操作柄与杯子之间的距离在不同条件下有所变化。对于大鼠来说,在前往收集和食用食物之前所做出的反应次数随着距离的增加而增加,但鸽子并非如此。在实验2中,两个操作柄被放置在距离固定食物源不同的位置;鸽子和大鼠都优先使用最靠近食物源的操作柄。实验3是对实验1用鸽子进行的系统重复。在不同条件下,每啄一次左键会使即将出现的食槽持续时间增加0.5、1.5或2.5秒。根据条件,在右键上完成1、4、8、16或32次啄击的比率要求,然后会产生一个持续时间取决于先前左键啄击次数的食物食槽。随着右键上比率要求的增加,鸽子对左键的反应更多,获得的食物也更多。总体而言,结果重复了先前的研究,强调了这些物种之间的异同。从最优觅食、强化物敏感性和延迟折扣的角度对结果进行了讨论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5752/3532893/11603b747336/nihms411489f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5752/3532893/14ceb2b2230d/nihms411489f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5752/3532893/32b67326470f/nihms411489f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5752/3532893/11603b747336/nihms411489f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5752/3532893/14ceb2b2230d/nihms411489f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5752/3532893/32b67326470f/nihms411489f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5752/3532893/11603b747336/nihms411489f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Rats (Rattus norvegicus) and pigeons (Columbia livia) are sensitive to the distance to food, but only rats request more food when distance increases.大鼠(褐家鼠)和鸽子(原鸽)对与食物的距离敏感,但只有大鼠在距离增加时会索要更多食物。
Behav Processes. 2012 Nov;91(3):236-43. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2012.09.002. Epub 2012 Sep 16.
2
An operant analog of food caching in the pigeon (Columba livia).鸽子(家鸽)食物贮藏行为的操作性模拟。
Learn Behav. 2022 Mar;50(1):82-88. doi: 10.3758/s13420-021-00477-2. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
3
Mechanisms underlying the effects of unsignaled delayed reinforcement on key pecking of pigeons under variable-interval schedules.在可变间隔时间表下,无信号延迟强化对鸽子按键啄击行为影响的潜在机制。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1998 Mar;69(2):103-22. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1998.69-103.
4
Effects of search cost on foraging and feeding: a three-component chain analysis.搜索成本对觅食与进食的影响:三成分链式分析
J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Sep;42(2):211-21. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.42-211.
5
Serial pattern learning: Pigeons (Columba livia) prefer an improving schedule over an initially easier fixed ratio schedule.
J Comp Psychol. 2024 Nov;138(4):232-238. doi: 10.1037/com0000383.
6
Animal procrastination: Pigeons choose to defer experiencing an aversive gap or a peck requirement.动物的拖延行为:鸽子会选择推迟经历厌恶间隙或啄击要求。
Learn Behav. 2020 Jun;48(2):246-253. doi: 10.3758/s13420-019-00397-2.
7
Sunk cost: pigeons (Columba livia), too, show bias to complete a task rather than shift to another.沉没成本:鸽子(家鸽)也表现出倾向于完成一项任务而不是转向另一项任务的偏好。
J Comp Psychol. 2012 Feb;126(1):1-9. doi: 10.1037/a0023826. Epub 2011 May 16.
8
The "lunching" effect: pigeons track motion towards food more than motion away from it.“趋近”效应:鸽子追踪朝向食物的运动比追踪远离食物的运动更准确。
Behav Processes. 2009 Nov;82(3):229-35. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.06.010. Epub 2009 Jul 8.
9
Response factors in delay discounting: evidence for Pavlovian influences on delay discounting in pigeons.延迟折扣中的反应因素:巴甫洛夫式影响鸽子延迟折扣的证据。
Behav Processes. 2013 Sep;98:37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.04.009. Epub 2013 Apr 22.
10
Why pigeons say what they do: reinforcer magnitude and response requirement effects on say responding in say-do correspondence.为什么鸽子会这样说:强化物大小和反应要求对“说-做”对应中说反应的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 May;93(3):395-413. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2010.93-395.

引用本文的文献

1
Spatial discrimination reversal and incremental repeated acquisition in adolescent and adult BALB/c mice.青春期和成年BALB/c小鼠的空间辨别逆转和递增重复习得
Behav Processes. 2015 Sep;118:59-70. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.06.005. Epub 2015 Jun 5.
2
Captive chimpanzee foraging in a social setting: a test of problem solving, flexibility, and spatial discounting.圈养黑猩猩在社交环境中的觅食行为:对解决问题、灵活性和空间折扣的测试。
PeerJ. 2015 Mar 17;3:e833. doi: 10.7717/peerj.833. eCollection 2015.
3
Applicability to foraging simulation of a reinforcement schedule controlling the response energy of pigeons.

本文引用的文献

1
Hoarding behavior in the pigeon (Columbia livia): performance under the restriction of food availability.鸽子(家鸽)的囤积行为:食物供应受限情况下的表现
Behav Processes. 1994 Apr;31(2-3):167-76. doi: 10.1016/0376-6357(94)90004-3.
2
Foraging by rats: Intuitions, models, data.大鼠觅食:直觉、模型与数据。
Behav Processes. 1989 Jun;19(1-3):95-105. doi: 10.1016/0376-6357(89)90033-8.
3
Let the pigeon drive the bus: pigeons can plan future routes in a room.让鸽子开巴士:鸽子可以在房间里规划未来的路线。
适用于控制鸽子反应能量的强化程序的觅食模拟。
Learn Behav. 2013 Dec;41(4):425-32. doi: 10.3758/s13420-013-0117-7.
Anim Cogn. 2012 May;15(3):379-91. doi: 10.1007/s10071-011-0463-9. Epub 2011 Oct 1.
4
Animal foraging: More than met the eye.动物觅食:超乎所见。
Trends Ecol Evol. 1998 Mar;13(3):110-1. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(97)83353-8.
5
Animal foraging: past, present and future.动物觅食:过去、现在和未来。
Trends Ecol Evol. 1997 Aug;12(9):360-4. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(97)01097-5.
6
Models of trace decay, eligibility for reinforcement, and delay of reinforcement gradients, from exponential to hyperboloid.从指数型到双曲线型的痕迹消退模型、强化的 eligibility for reinforcement(此处可能有误,原词可能有误,推测可能是“强化资格”之类意思)以及强化延迟梯度。
Behav Processes. 2011 May;87(1):57-63. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.12.016. Epub 2011 Jan 5.
7
Maladaptive choice behaviour by pigeons: an animal analogue and possible mechanism for gambling (sub-optimal human decision-making behaviour).鸽子的适应不良选择行为:一种动物模拟以及赌博(次优人类决策行为)的可能机制。
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Apr 22;278(1709):1203-8. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1607. Epub 2010 Oct 13.
8
Pigeons prefer conditional stimuli over their absence: a comment on Roberts et al. (2009).相较于无条件刺激的缺失,鸽子更偏好条件刺激:对罗伯茨等人(2009年)的评论。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010 Oct;36(4):506-9. doi: 10.1037/a0020202.
9
Distance and magnitude effects in sequential number discrimination by pigeons.鸽子在连续数字辨别中的距离和大小效应。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010 Apr;36(2):206-16. doi: 10.1037/a0017226.
10
Reinforcer accumulation in a token-reinforcement context with pigeons.鸽子在代币强化情境中的强化物积累。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2008 Nov;90(3):283-99. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2008.90-283.