• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)与颈动脉血管成形术及支架置入术(CAS):短期和中期结果

CEA versus CAS: short-term and mid-term results.

作者信息

Felli M M G, Alunno A, Castiglione A, Malaj A, Faccenna F, Jabbour J, Laurito A, Stavri D, Gossetti B

机构信息

Paride Stefanini Department of Vascular Surgery, Policlinico Umberto 1, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Int Angiol. 2012 Oct;31(5):420-6.

PMID:22990503
Abstract

AIM

Ischemic stroke represents a major health problem and it is an important cause of long-term disability. The aim of this study was to compare short-term and mid-term results of carotid endarterectomy and stenting.

METHODS

During a three-year period, we enrolled 300 patients with carotid stenosis that fit with Stroke Prevention and Educational Awareness Diffusion (SPREAD) guidelines and we performed 150 carotid endarterectomy operations (CEA) and 150 carotid artery stenting procedures (CAS) with distal protection devices. All patients underwent preoperative and postoperative: neurological examination, ultrasound imaging, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and cognitive tests; moreover all patients were submitted to preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative Transcranial Doppler (TCD) monitoring, in order to detect microembolic signals (MES).

RESULTS

Mortality was zero; two patients developed myocardial infarction in the CEA group during follow-up. The main post-operative results after endarterectomy versus CAS were respectively: neurological deficit: 1.3% vs. 3.3%, embolic lesions at postoperative MRI: 4% vs. 34% and worsening of cognitive tests: 4% vs. 25.3%.

CONCLUSION

CEA seems to be the treatment of choice for carotid stenosis, due to its low rate of mortality and morbidity, especially in asymptomatic patients; CAS should be carried out only in particular subgroup of cases, such as: restenosis, previous neck surgery or radian therapy, anatomical high bifurcation or extended lesions. Ongoing multicenter randomized trials may give a definitive answer to this matter.

摘要

目的

缺血性中风是一个主要的健康问题,也是导致长期残疾的重要原因。本研究的目的是比较颈动脉内膜切除术和支架置入术的短期和中期结果。

方法

在三年期间,我们纳入了300例符合中风预防与教育意识传播(SPREAD)指南的颈动脉狭窄患者,进行了150例颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)和150例使用远端保护装置的颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)。所有患者均接受术前和术后的:神经学检查、超声成像、磁共振成像(MRI)和认知测试;此外,所有患者均接受术前、术中和术后的经颅多普勒(TCD)监测,以检测微栓子信号(MES)。

结果

死亡率为零;CEA组有2例患者在随访期间发生心肌梗死。内膜切除术与CAS术后的主要结果分别为:神经功能缺损:1.3%对3.3%,术后MRI上的栓塞性病变:4%对34%,认知测试恶化:4%对25.3%。

结论

由于CEA的死亡率和发病率较低,尤其是在无症状患者中,它似乎是颈动脉狭窄的首选治疗方法;CAS仅应在特定的病例亚组中进行,如:再狭窄、既往颈部手术或放射治疗、解剖学高位分叉或广泛性病变。正在进行的多中心随机试验可能会对此问题给出明确答案。

相似文献

1
CEA versus CAS: short-term and mid-term results.颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)与颈动脉血管成形术及支架置入术(CAS):短期和中期结果
Int Angiol. 2012 Oct;31(5):420-6.
2
Embolism to the brain during carotid stenting and surgery.颈动脉支架置入术和手术过程中发生的脑栓塞。
Acta Chir Belg. 2007 Mar-Apr;107(2):151-4.
3
Alert for increased long-term follow-up after carotid artery stenting: results of a prospective, randomized, single-center trial of carotid artery stenting vs carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉支架置入术后长期随访增加的警示:颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术的前瞻性、随机、单中心试验结果
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Jul;48(1):93-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.02.049. Epub 2008 May 16.
4
Silent stroke and cognitive decline in asymptomatic carotid stenosis revascularization.无症状性颈动脉狭窄血管重建术中的无症状性卒中与认知功能减退
Vascular. 2012 Aug;20(4):181-7. doi: 10.1258/vasc.2011.oa0342. Epub 2012 Jun 25.
5
Safety and feasibility of a novel transcervical access neuroprotection system for carotid artery stenting in the PROOF Study.在 PROOF 研究中,新型经颈入路神经保护系统在颈动脉支架置入术中的安全性和可行性。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Nov;54(5):1317-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.04.040. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
6
Primary carotid artery stenting versus carotid artery stenting for postcarotid endarterectomy stenosis.原发性颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术后狭窄的颈动脉支架置入术对比
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Nov;50(5):1031-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.06.051. Epub 2009 Aug 22.
7
Carotid angioplasty and stenting is safe and effective for treatment of recurrent stenosis after eversion endarterectomy.颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术对于外翻式内膜切除术术后复发性狭窄的治疗是安全有效的。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Sep;60(3):645-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.03.288. Epub 2014 May 1.
8
Comparative study on carotid revascularization (endarterectomy vs stenting) using markers of cellular brain injury, neuropsychometric tests, and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.颈动脉血运重建(内膜切除术与支架置入术)的细胞性脑损伤标志物、神经心理测试和弥散加权磁共振成像的对比研究。
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Mar;51(3):584-91, 591.e1-3; discussion 592. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.10.079. Epub 2010 Jan 4.
9
Cognitive changes after surgery vs stenting for carotid artery stenosis.颈动脉狭窄手术与支架治疗后的认知变化。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Sep;54(3):691-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.03.253. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
10
Treatment of significant carotid artery stenosis in 1824 patients.1824例严重颈动脉狭窄的治疗
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2015 Feb;56(1):107-18. Epub 2013 Jun 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Silent brain infarcts on diffusion-weighted imaging after carotid revascularisation: A surrogate outcome measure for procedural stroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis.颈动脉血运重建术后扩散加权成像上的无症状脑梗死:程序性卒中的替代结局指标?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Stroke J. 2019 Jun;4(2):127-143. doi: 10.1177/2396987318824491. Epub 2019 Jan 15.
2
Timing of carotid intervention.颈动脉介入治疗的时机。
Br J Surg. 2018 Sep;105(10):1231-1233. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10950.
3
New cerebral lesions at magnetic resonance imaging after carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy: an updated meta-analysis.
颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术相比,磁共振成像显示的新脑损伤:一项更新的荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2015 May 27;10(5):e0129209. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129209. eCollection 2015.
4
Carotid endarterectomy using a "home-constructed" shunt for patients intolerant to cross-clamping.对于不能耐受血管夹闭的患者,采用“自制”分流管进行颈动脉内膜切除术。
Surg Today. 2015 Mar;45(3):284-9. doi: 10.1007/s00595-014-0896-2. Epub 2014 Apr 19.