• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无症状性颈动脉狭窄血管重建术中的无症状性卒中与认知功能减退

Silent stroke and cognitive decline in asymptomatic carotid stenosis revascularization.

作者信息

Capoccia Laura, Sbarigia Enrico, Rizzo Annarita, Mansour Wassim, Speziale Francesco

机构信息

Vascular Surgery Division, Department of Surgery 'Paride Stefanini', Policlinico Umberto I, 'Sapienza' University of Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Vascular. 2012 Aug;20(4):181-7. doi: 10.1258/vasc.2011.oa0342. Epub 2012 Jun 25.

DOI:10.1258/vasc.2011.oa0342
PMID:22734086
Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between serum levels of S100β and neuron-specific enolase (NSE), postoperative diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score in asymptomatic patients affected by ≥ 70% carotid stenosis submitted to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting (CAS), and to compare MMSE scores and DW-MRI findings at follow-up evaluations. Between April 2008 and April 2009, 60 patients were submitted to carotid intervention. All patients underwent DW-MRI and MMSE preoperatively, at 24 hours postoperatively, at 6 months and at 12 months. Neurobiomarkers were assessed for each patient at six time-points. Thirty-two patients were submitted to CEA and 28 to CAS. No mortality was observed. One CAS patient presented with an ischemic stroke. In six CAS patients and one CEA patient, new subclinical ischemic lesions were detected at postoperative DW-MRI (21.4% versus 3%, P = 0.03). In CAS patients, new DW-MRI lesions were significantly associated with MMSE score decline (P = 0.001). At 12 months, patients presenting with new postoperative ischemic lesions showed lower MMSE scores (P = 0.08). CAS patients showed increasing neurobiomarker levels compared with CEA patients (P = 0.02). In conclusion, microembolization effects may persist over time, so it should be avoided whenever possible. Carotid revascularization procedures should be evaluated and compared not only with respect to death/stroke but also to microembolism rates.

摘要

本研究旨在评估无症状性颈动脉狭窄≥70%且接受颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)或颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)的患者血清S100β和神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)水平、术后弥散加权磁共振成像(DW-MRI)与简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)评分之间的关系,并比较随访评估时的MMSE评分和DW-MRI结果。2008年4月至2009年4月期间,60例患者接受了颈动脉干预。所有患者在术前、术后24小时、6个月和12个月均接受了DW-MRI和MMSE检查。在六个时间点对每位患者的神经生物标志物进行了评估。32例患者接受了CEA,28例接受了CAS。未观察到死亡病例。1例CAS患者发生缺血性卒中。在6例CAS患者和1例CEA患者中,术后DW-MRI检测到新的亚临床缺血性病变(21.4%对3%,P = 0.03)。在CAS患者中,新的DW-MRI病变与MMSE评分下降显著相关(P = 0.001)。在12个月时,出现术后新缺血性病变的患者MMSE评分较低(P = 0.08)。与CEA患者相比,CAS患者的神经生物标志物水平升高(P = 0.02)。总之,微栓塞效应可能会随时间持续存在,因此应尽可能避免。颈动脉血运重建手术不仅应在死亡/卒中方面进行评估和比较,还应在微栓塞发生率方面进行评估和比较。

相似文献

1
Silent stroke and cognitive decline in asymptomatic carotid stenosis revascularization.无症状性颈动脉狭窄血管重建术中的无症状性卒中与认知功能减退
Vascular. 2012 Aug;20(4):181-7. doi: 10.1258/vasc.2011.oa0342. Epub 2012 Jun 25.
2
Comparative study on carotid revascularization (endarterectomy vs stenting) using markers of cellular brain injury, neuropsychometric tests, and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.颈动脉血运重建(内膜切除术与支架置入术)的细胞性脑损伤标志物、神经心理测试和弥散加权磁共振成像的对比研究。
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Mar;51(3):584-91, 591.e1-3; discussion 592. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.10.079. Epub 2010 Jan 4.
3
Cognitive changes after surgery vs stenting for carotid artery stenosis.颈动脉狭窄手术与支架治疗后的认知变化。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Sep;54(3):691-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.03.253. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
4
Protein S-100B as biochemical marker of brain ischemic damage after treatment of carotid stenosis.蛋白质S-100B作为颈动脉狭窄治疗后脑缺血损伤的生化标志物。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2011 Oct;25(7):975-8. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2011.03.007. Epub 2011 May 28.
5
Safety and feasibility of a novel transcervical access neuroprotection system for carotid artery stenting in the PROOF Study.在 PROOF 研究中,新型经颈入路神经保护系统在颈动脉支架置入术中的安全性和可行性。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Nov;54(5):1317-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.04.040. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
6
Randomized comparison of distal and proximal cerebral protection during carotid artery stenting.随机比较颈动脉支架置入术时远端和近端脑保护。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Nov;6(11):1203-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.07.006.
7
Embolism to the brain during carotid stenting and surgery.颈动脉支架置入术和手术过程中发生的脑栓塞。
Acta Chir Belg. 2007 Mar-Apr;107(2):151-4.
8
Randomized clinical trial of open-cell vs closed-cell stents for carotid stenting and effects of stent design on cerebral embolization.随机临床试验:开环支架与闭环支架在颈动脉支架置入术中的应用比较,以及支架设计对脑栓塞的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Nov;54(5):1310-1316.e1; discussion 1316. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.05.013. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
9
Longitudinal evaluation of neurobehavioral outcomes after carotid revascularization.颈动脉血运重建术后神经行为学结局的纵向评估。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2014 May;28(4):874-81. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2013.06.032. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
10
CEA versus CAS: short-term and mid-term results.颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)与颈动脉血管成形术及支架置入术(CAS):短期和中期结果
Int Angiol. 2012 Oct;31(5):420-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Abnormalities of regional brain activity in patients with asymptomatic internal carotid artery occlusion: a resting-state fMRI study.无症状性颈内动脉闭塞患者的局部脑活动异常:一项静息态功能磁共振成像研究。
BMC Neurol. 2025 Apr 25;25(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12883-025-04156-x.
2
The association between neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and covert brain infarction after carotid endarterectomy: a single center retrospective study.颈动脉内膜切除术后中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值与隐匿性脑梗死的关系:一项单中心回顾性研究。
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Mar 31;48(1):338. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03467-4.
3
Temporal changes and implications of diffusion tensor imaging metrics and cerebral white matter volume in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy - a prospective study.
颈动脉内膜切除术患者弥散张量成像指标和脑白质体积的时间变化及意义——一项前瞻性研究
Neuroradiology. 2025 Apr;67(4):943-959. doi: 10.1007/s00234-024-03527-4. Epub 2025 Jan 17.
4
The risk factors of postoperative cognitive dysfunction in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy: an updated meta-analysis.颈动脉内膜切除术患者术后认知功能障碍的危险因素:一项更新的荟萃分析。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Nov 9;18(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s13019-023-02428-6.
5
Correlation between Higher Brain Dysfunction and Cerebral Blood Flow after Carotid Artery Stenting.颈动脉支架置入术后高级脑功能障碍与脑血流的相关性
J Neuroendovasc Ther. 2021;15(10):637-645. doi: 10.5797/jnet.oa.2020-0133. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
6
Cognitive function after carotid endarterectomy in asymptomatic patients.无症状患者颈动脉内膜切除术术后认知功能。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2023 Jun;64(3):317-321. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.23.12632-2. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
7
Effects of nurse-led home-based telephone support or home visits on cognitive function.护士主导的家庭电话支持或家访对认知功能的影响。
Clin Transl Sci. 2022 Mar;15(3):741-748. doi: 10.1111/cts.13195. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
8
Carotid revascularization and cognitive impairment: the neglected role of cerebral small vessel disease.颈动脉血运重建与认知障碍:脑小血管病被忽视的作用
Neurol Sci. 2022 Jan;43(1):139-152. doi: 10.1007/s10072-021-05629-w. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
9
Risk factors associated with microembolization after carotid intervention.颈动脉介入术后与微栓塞相关的危险因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 May;71(5):1572-1578. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.06.202. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
10
Silent brain infarcts on diffusion-weighted imaging after carotid revascularisation: A surrogate outcome measure for procedural stroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis.颈动脉血运重建术后扩散加权成像上的无症状脑梗死:程序性卒中的替代结局指标?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Stroke J. 2019 Jun;4(2):127-143. doi: 10.1177/2396987318824491. Epub 2019 Jan 15.