Suppr超能文献

关节镜肩袖修复术后多模式肩部注射或静脉患者自控镇痛的随机对照试验。

Randomized, controlled trial of multimodal shoulder injection or intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Seoul, Korea,

出版信息

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Dec;21(12):2877-83. doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-2202-4. Epub 2012 Sep 19.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of postoperative pain control and adverse effects of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA) and multimodal shoulder injection after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

METHODS

Seventy patients scheduled for elective arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were prospectively randomized to receive either IV PCA or multimodal shoulder injections. Postoperative pain, nausea, vomiting, and other adverse effects were assessed at 2, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after surgery. Use of rescue analgesics and antiemetics, level of satisfaction, and cost for both modalities were recorded.

RESULTS

Pain was better controlled in the multimodal shoulder injection group at 2 h postoperatively (P = 0.001). However, the use of additional analgesics was greater in the multimodal shoulder injection group during 12-48 h after surgery (P < 0.001). The incidence of nausea within 12-24 h after surgery in the multimodal shoulder injection group (5.7 %) was less significant compared with that in the IV PCA group (31.4 %, P = 0.012), but no difference in overall incidence of the use of rescue antiemetics was observed between the groups (n.s.). No differences in adverse effects were noted between the groups. Patient satisfaction also showed no differences (n.s.). Costs required for both modalities were $20.3 for the multimodal shoulder injection and $157.8 for the IV PCA.

CONCLUSIONS

Multimodal shoulder injection is a safe and effective modality for management of pain after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Considering the expense and need of special devices for IV PCA, multimodal shoulder injection may be an effective and safe alternative to IV PCA for postoperative analgesia after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较关节镜肩袖修复术后静脉患者自控镇痛(IV PCA)和多模式肩部注射对术后疼痛控制效果和不良反应的影响。

方法

70 例择期行关节镜肩袖修复术的患者前瞻性随机分为 IV PCA 组或多模式肩部注射组。术后 2、6、12、24 和 48 h 评估术后疼痛、恶心、呕吐等不良反应。记录两种模式下的解救镇痛药物和止吐药物的使用、满意度和成本。

结果

术后 2 h 时多模式肩部注射组疼痛控制更好(P = 0.001)。然而,在术后 12-48 h 期间,多模式肩部注射组需要更多的额外镇痛药物(P < 0.001)。多模式肩部注射组在术后 12-24 h 内恶心的发生率(5.7%)显著低于 IV PCA 组(31.4%,P = 0.012),但两组之间使用解救止吐药物的总发生率没有差异(n.s.)。两组之间未观察到不良反应的差异。患者满意度也无差异(n.s.)。两种模式所需的成本分别为多模式肩部注射 20.3 美元,IV PCA 157.8 美元。

结论

多模式肩部注射是治疗关节镜肩袖修复术后疼痛的安全有效的方法。考虑到 IV PCA 的费用和特殊设备的需求,多模式肩部注射可能是关节镜肩袖修复术后 IV PCA 有效且安全的替代方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验