Centre for Population Health Sciences, School of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, UK.
Perspect Public Health. 2012 Sep;132(5):235-9. doi: 10.1177/1757913911412217. Epub 2011 Jul 15.
In the centuries following the Enlightenment, scientific and technological developments gave 'modern people' an unprecedented ability to understand, predict and control the natural world. This has brought health and social benefits unimaginable to our ancestors and sets us apart from all previous generations. Yet there is a wide-ranging body of evidence that suggests that modernity is now in decline, largely because its methods and mindset are increasingly recognized as unsustainable. Problems are manifest in the emergence of new public health epidemics such as obesity and addictive behaviours, the loss of well-being and increase in anxiety and depression in affluent society, and the persistence of ever-widening health and social inequalities at national and global levels. Still larger problems now confront us, such as climate change, peak oil and the loss of biodiversity, all of which are linked to the 'modern' way of life. We are potentially faced with the collapse of certain aspects of modern society: we are certainly faced with the prospect of inevitable change. While the broad public health community has an important role to play in developing workable solutions to such daunting problems, we argue that some profound changes will be needed in order for us to cope successfully. No blueprints for dealing with change exist, which means that we will need to learn our way into the future. In this paper we take a perspective on the role and nature of the future practitioner in public health and health promotion. We argue that future practitioners will need to develop new ways of thinking, being and doing; new perspectives and new forms of understanding the world. We believe our discipline - and people generally - to be capable of such development, as insights from multiple sources tell us that human nature is malleable, not fixed. We use this analysis to trace, as examples, the imagined lives of five women living in different eras over the course of history in a Western society, and the emergence of different mindsets or worldviews, as the social, economic and cultural context changes. Post-modern analysts might insist that we have no basis for making value judgements between such different worldviews. In this paper, however, we argue that future practitioners should be empathetic to different views and willing to move beyond them, as necessary. We will need to learn and develop in ways that are compatible with our intrinsic needs as human beings and the needs of our ecosystem. We conclude by suggesting just some of the supportive processes of change needed in mapping out a more sustainable future for the public health community.
在启蒙运动后的几个世纪里,科学技术的发展使“现代人”前所未有地能够理解、预测和控制自然世界。这为我们的祖先带来了健康和社会福利,是他们无法想象的,使我们有别于所有前代人。然而,有大量证据表明,现代性正在衰落,主要是因为其方法和思维模式越来越被认为是不可持续的。在新的公共卫生流行病如肥胖和成瘾行为的出现、富裕社会中幸福感的丧失和焦虑与抑郁的增加以及国家和全球层面上不断扩大的健康和社会不平等方面,问题已经显现出来。现在更大的问题摆在我们面前,如气候变化、石油峰值和生物多样性的丧失,所有这些都与“现代”生活方式有关。我们可能面临现代社会某些方面的崩溃:我们肯定面临着不可避免的变革的前景。虽然广大公共卫生界在制定可行的解决方案方面发挥着重要作用,但我们认为,为了成功应对这些艰巨的问题,我们需要进行一些深刻的变革。没有处理变革的蓝图,这意味着我们需要在未来的道路上学习。在本文中,我们从公共卫生和健康促进的未来从业者的角度看待作用和性质。我们认为,未来的从业者将需要发展新的思维、存在和行动方式;新的观点和理解世界的新形式。我们相信,我们的学科——以及一般人——有能力进行这样的发展,因为来自多个来源的见解告诉我们,人性是可塑的,而不是固定的。我们使用这种分析来追踪,例如,在一个西方社会中,历史上不同时期的五位女性的想象生活,以及随着社会、经济和文化背景的变化,不同心态或世界观的出现。后现代分析师可能会坚持认为,我们没有基础在这样不同的世界观之间进行价值判断。然而,在本文中,我们认为未来的从业者应该对不同的观点表示同情,并在必要时愿意超越它们。我们将需要以与我们作为人类的内在需求和我们生态系统的需求相兼容的方式学习和发展。最后,我们建议在为公共卫生界规划一个更可持续的未来时,需要一些支持变革的过程。