Saleh Saber Fariba, Abolfazli Nader, Nuroloyuni Sara, Khodabakhsh Sohleh, Bahrami Mehran, Nahidi Reza, Zeighami Somaieh
Associate Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2012 Summer;6(3):98-102. doi: 10.5681/joddd.2012.021. Epub 2012 Sep 1.
In contrast to prepared natural dentin abutments,little is known concerning factors influencing the retention of fixed prostheses cemented to implant abutments. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of im-plant abutment height on the retention of single castings cemented to wide and narrow platform implant abutments.
Thirty-six parallel-sided abutments (Biohorizon Straight Abutment) of narrow platform (NP) and wide platform (WP) sizes with their analogs were used. In each group of platform size, abutments were prepared with axial wall heights of 5, 4, 3, 2 mm (n=9). On the whole 72 castings were constructed, which incorporated an attachment to allow removal. Castings were cemented to abutments with TempBond®. A uniaxial tensile force was applied to the crown using an Instron machine until cement failure occurred. Analysis of variance of the models were fit to determine the effect of height of abutment of the restorations on the mean tensile strength (α=0.05).
The mean peak removal force for corresponding abutments was significantly different (P < 0.05): (1) with plat-form sizes: WP > NP; (2) with alteration of axial wall height for NP: 5 mm > 4 mm > 3 mm = 2 mm and for WP: 5 mm > 4 mm = 3 mm = 2 mm.
The retention of NP cement-retained restorations is influenced by the wall height but not in same manner as WP. Restorations of narrow-platform size with longer abutment exhibited higher tensile resistance to dislodgement.
与预备好的天然牙本质基台相比,关于影响固定在种植基台上的修复体固位的因素,人们了解甚少。本研究的目的是调查种植基台高度对粘结在宽平台和窄平台种植基台上的单冠铸件固位的影响。
使用36个窄平台(NP)和宽平台(WP)尺寸的平行面基台(Biohorizon直基台)及其代型。在每组平台尺寸中,将基台制备成轴向壁高度分别为5、4、3、2mm(n = 9)。总共制作了72个铸件,其中包含一个便于拆除的附件。铸件用TempBond®粘结到基台上。使用Instron机器对牙冠施加单轴拉力,直至粘结剂失效。对模型进行方差分析,以确定修复体基台高度对平均拉伸强度的影响(α = 0.05)。
相应基台的平均峰值拆除力有显著差异(P < 0.05):(1)平台尺寸方面:WP > NP;(2)对于NP,轴向壁高度变化时:5mm > 4mm > 3mm = 2mm,对于WP:5mm > 4mm = 3mm = 2mm。
NP粘结固位修复体的固位受壁高度的影响,但与WP的方式不同。窄平台尺寸且基台较长的修复体表现出更高的抗脱位拉伸阻力。