Department of Psychiatry, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2012;31 Suppl 3:S33-47. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2012-112118.
Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) detects microstructural changes of the cerebral white matter in Alzheimer's disease (AD). The use of DTI for the diagnosis of AD in a multicenter setting has not yet been investigated. We used voxel-based analysis of fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, and grey matter volumes from multimodal magnetic resonance imaging data of 137 AD patients and 143 healthy elderly controls collected across 9 different scanners. We compared different univariate analysis approaches to model the effect of scanner, including a linear model across all scans with a scanner covariate, a random effects model with scanner as a random variable as well as a voxel-based meta-analysis. We found significant reduction of fractional anisotropy and significant increase of mean diffusivity in core areas of AD pathology including corpus callosum, medial and lateral temporal lobes, as well as fornix, cingulate gyrus, precuneus, and prefrontal lobe white matter. Grey matter atrophy was most pronounced in medial and lateral temporal lobe as well as parietal and prefrontal association cortex. The effects of group were spatially more restricted with random effects modeling of scanner effects compared to simple pooled analysis. All three analysis approaches yielded similar accuracy of group separation in block-wise cross-validated logistic regression. Our results suggest similar effects of center on group separation based on different analysis approaches and confirm a typical pattern of cortical and subcortical microstructural changes in AD using a large multimodal multicenter data set.
弥散张量成像(DTI)可检测阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者大脑白质的微观结构变化。在多中心环境中使用 DTI 诊断 AD 尚未得到研究。我们使用来自 9 种不同扫描仪的 137 名 AD 患者和 143 名健康老年人对照的多模态磁共振成像数据,对各向异性分数、平均扩散率和灰质体积进行基于体素的分析。我们比较了不同的单变量分析方法来模拟扫描仪的影响,包括对所有扫描使用线性模型并带有扫描仪协变量、使用扫描仪作为随机变量的随机效应模型以及基于体素的荟萃分析。我们发现 AD 病理学核心区域的各向异性分数显著降低,平均扩散率显著增加,包括胼胝体、内侧和外侧颞叶,以及穹窿、扣带回、楔前叶和前额叶白质。灰质萎缩在内侧和外侧颞叶以及顶叶和前额叶联合皮质最为明显。与简单的 pooled 分析相比,采用扫描仪效应的随机效应模型进行分析时,组间差异的空间范围更大。在基于块的交叉验证逻辑回归中,所有三种分析方法的组间分离准确率相似。我们的结果表明,基于不同的分析方法,中心对组间分离的影响相似,并使用大型多模态多中心数据集证实了 AD 患者皮质和皮质下微观结构变化的典型模式。