Effects of ionic and nonionic contrast media on bradyarrhythmia during coronary angiography: a comparison of Renografin-76, Hypaque-76, and Isovue-370.

Contrast media occasionally produce bradyarrhythmias defined as a 25% decrease in heart rate and/or developing atrioventricular block during coronary angiography. Twelve left coronary angiographies and seven right coronary angiographies were performed with 10 ml of diatrizoate meglumine and diatrizoate sodium (Renografin-76 [R76] or Hypaque [H76]) or iopamidol (Isovue 370 [ISO]) in a blinded randomized fashion. Heart rate decreased significantly from 135 +/- 5 to 120 +/- 5 beats/min (p less than 0.001) with R76, to 127 +/- 7 beats/min (p less than 0.01) with H76, and to 130 +/- 6 beats/min (p less than 0.05) with ISO in left coronary angiographies; more profound decrease was observed in right coronary angiographies from 134 +/- 4 to 87 +/- 18 beats/min (p less than 0.001) with R76, to 99 +/- 14 beats/min (p less than 0.001) with H76, and to 125 +/- 7 beats/min (p less than 0.01) with ISO. In 12 left coronary angiographies bradyarrhythmia was observed in five cases with R76, two with H76, and none with ISO. In seven right coronary angiographies it occurred in six with R76, three with H76, and none with ISO. The differences in the incidence of bradyarrhythmia between R76 and ISO were significant during left and right coronary angiographies (p less than 0.05 and p less than 0.01, respectively). Thus ionic contrast media produced more marked bradyarrhythmias than nonionic contrast media in coronary angiography, especially R76. Right coronary angiography resulted in more profound bradyarrhythmias than left coronary angiographies. This study suggested that nonionic contrast media (ISO) might be preferable to ionic contrast media (R76 or H76) for coronary arteriography.