• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用羟基磷灰石间隔物的中线劈开开门式椎板成形术:两种不同形状间隔物的比较

Midline-Splitting Open Door Laminoplasty Using Hydroxyapatite Spacers : Comparison between Two Different Shaped Spacers.

作者信息

Park Jin Hoon, Jeon Sang Ryong

机构信息

Department of Neurological Surgery, Gangneung Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Gangneung, Korea.

出版信息

J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2012 Jul;52(1):27-31. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2012.52.1.27. Epub 2012 Jul 31.

DOI:10.3340/jkns.2012.52.1.27
PMID:22993674
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3440499/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Although hydroxyapatite (HA) spacer has been used for laminoplasty, there have been no reports on factors associated with fusion and on the effects of HA shape.

METHODS

During January 2004 and January 2010, 45 patients with compressive cervical myelopathy underwent midline-splitting open door laminoplasty with winged (33 cases) and wingless (12 cases) HAs by a single surgeon. Minimal and mean follow up times were 12 and 28.1 months, respectively. Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score was used for clinical outcome measurement. Cervical X-rays were taken preoperatively, immediately post-operatively, and after 3, 6, and 12 months and computed tomography scans were performed preoperatively, immediately post-operatively and after 12 months. Cervical lordosis, canal dimension, fusion between lamina and HA, and affecting factors of fusion were analyzed.

RESULTS

All surgeries were performed on 142 levels, 99 in the winged and 43 in the wingless HA groups. JOA scores of the winged group changed from 10.4±2.94 to 13.3±2.35 and scores of the wingless group changed from 10.8±2.87 to 13.8±3.05. There was no significant difference on lordotic and canal dimensional change between two groups. Post-operative 12 month fusion rate between lamina and HA was significantly lower in the winged group (18.2 vs. 48.8% p=0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, male gender, and wingless type HA were significantly associated with fusion.

CONCLUSION

Clinical outcome was similar in patients receiving winged and wingless HA, but the wingless type was associated with a higher rate of fusion between HA and lamina at 12 months post-operatively.

摘要

目的

尽管羟基磷灰石(HA)间隔物已用于椎板成形术,但尚无关于融合相关因素及HA形状影响的报道。

方法

2004年1月至2010年1月期间,45例压迫性颈椎病患者由同一位外科医生采用带翼(33例)和无翼(12例)HA行中线劈开开门式椎板成形术。最短和平均随访时间分别为12个月和28.1个月。采用日本骨科协会(JOA)评分评估临床疗效。术前、术后即刻、术后3、6和12个月拍摄颈椎X线片,术前、术后即刻和术后12个月进行计算机断层扫描。分析颈椎前凸、椎管尺寸、椎板与HA之间的融合情况以及融合的影响因素。

结果

所有手术共涉及142个节段,带翼HA组99个节段,无翼HA组43个节段。带翼组JOA评分从10.4±2.94变为13.3±2.35,无翼组评分从10.8±2.87变为13.8±3.05。两组之间在颈椎前凸和椎管尺寸变化方面无显著差异。术后12个月时,带翼组椎板与HA之间的融合率显著低于无翼组(18.2%对48.8%,p = 0.001)。多因素分析显示,后纵韧带骨化、男性性别和无翼型HA与融合显著相关。

结论

接受带翼和无翼HA的患者临床疗效相似,但无翼型在术后12个月时HA与椎板之间的融合率更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d379/3440499/5328294a6dc7/jkns-52-27-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d379/3440499/b1ca1ba71f15/jkns-52-27-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d379/3440499/65cbb37dc3bd/jkns-52-27-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d379/3440499/edf19b0b3b9a/jkns-52-27-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d379/3440499/66ee86bffcf1/jkns-52-27-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d379/3440499/5328294a6dc7/jkns-52-27-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d379/3440499/b1ca1ba71f15/jkns-52-27-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d379/3440499/65cbb37dc3bd/jkns-52-27-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d379/3440499/edf19b0b3b9a/jkns-52-27-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d379/3440499/66ee86bffcf1/jkns-52-27-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d379/3440499/5328294a6dc7/jkns-52-27-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Midline-Splitting Open Door Laminoplasty Using Hydroxyapatite Spacers : Comparison between Two Different Shaped Spacers.使用羟基磷灰石间隔物的中线劈开开门式椎板成形术:两种不同形状间隔物的比较
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2012 Jul;52(1):27-31. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2012.52.1.27. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
2
Midline Splitting Cervical Laminoplasty Using Allogeneic Bone Spacers: Comparison of Fusion Rates between Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy and Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament.使用同种异体骨间隔物的中线劈开颈椎椎板成形术:脊髓型颈椎病与后纵韧带骨化之间融合率的比较
Korean J Neurotrauma. 2014 Oct;10(2):60-5. doi: 10.13004/kjnt.2014.10.2.60. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
3
A Comparison of Implants Used in Double Door Laminoplasty : Allogeneic Bone Spacer versus Hydroxyapatite Spacer.双开门椎板成形术中使用的植入物比较:同种异体骨间隔物与羟基磷灰石间隔物
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2016 Nov;59(6):604-609. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2016.59.6.604. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
4
C3 laminectomy combined with modified unilateral laminoplasty and in situ reconstruction of the midline structures maintained cervical sagittal balance: a retrospective matched-pair case-control study.C3 椎板切除术联合改良单侧椎板成形术和中线结构原位重建维持颈椎矢状位平衡:一项回顾性配对病例对照研究。
Spine J. 2020 Sep;20(9):1403-1412. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.04.023. Epub 2020 May 6.
5
Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion versus posterior laminoplasty for the treatment of oppressive myelopathy owing to cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament: a meta-analysis.前路颈椎椎体次全切除融合术与后路椎板成形术治疗后纵韧带骨化症所致压迫性脊髓病的Meta分析
Eur Spine J. 2018 Jun;27(6):1375-1387. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5451-6. Epub 2018 Jan 15.
6
Modified Open-door Laminoplasty Using Hydroxyapatite Spacers and Miniplates.使用羟基磷灰石间隔物和微型钢板的改良开门式椎板成形术
Korean J Spine. 2014 Sep;11(3):188-94. doi: 10.14245/kjs.2014.11.3.188. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
7
Is cervical lordosis relevant in laminoplasty?颈椎曲度在椎板成形术中是否相关?
Spine J. 2013 Aug;13(8):914-21. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.02.032. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
8
The impact of dynamic factors on surgical outcomes after double-door laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine.动态因素对颈椎后纵韧带骨化症双开门椎板成形术后手术效果的影响
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Dec;21(6):938-43. doi: 10.3171/2014.8.SPINE131197. Epub 2014 Oct 3.
9
Initial radiological findings utilizing titanium basket for cervical open door laminoplasty.利用钛笼进行颈椎开门式椎板成形术的初步影像学结果。
Surg Neurol Int. 2017 Sep 7;8:217. doi: 10.4103/sni.sni_204_17. eCollection 2017.
10
Clinical and radiographic outcome of unilateral open-door laminoplasty with alternative levels centerpiece mini-plate fixation for cervical compressive myelopathy: a five-year follow-up study.单侧开门式椎板成形术联合替代节段中心微型钢板固定治疗颈椎压迫性脊髓病的临床及影像学结果:一项五年随访研究
Int Orthop. 2016 Jun;40(6):1267-74. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3194-3. Epub 2016 Apr 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Improved bone bonding of hydroxyapatite spacers with a high porosity in a quantitative computed tomography-image pixel analysis: A prospective 1-year comparative study of the consecutive cohort undergoing double-door cervical laminoplasty.定量计算机断层扫描图像像素分析中高孔隙率羟基磷灰石间隔物骨结合的改善:对接受双开门颈椎椎板成形术的连续队列进行的前瞻性1年比较研究。
JOR Spine. 2020 Feb 3;3(1):e1080. doi: 10.1002/jsp2.1080. eCollection 2020 Mar.
2
A Comparison of Implants Used in Double Door Laminoplasty : Allogeneic Bone Spacer versus Hydroxyapatite Spacer.双开门椎板成形术中使用的植入物比较:同种异体骨间隔物与羟基磷灰石间隔物
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2016 Nov;59(6):604-609. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2016.59.6.604. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term results of double-door laminoplasty using hydroxyapatite spacers in patients with compressive cervical myelopathy.使用羟基磷灰石间隔物施行颈椎板切除术治疗压迫性颈脊髓病的长期疗效。
Eur Spine J. 2011 Sep;20(9):1560-6. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1724-7. Epub 2011 Feb 19.
2
Effect of the decompressive extent on the magnitude of the spinal cord shift after expansive open-door laminoplasty.减压范围对扩大开门椎板成形术后脊髓移位程度的影响。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Jun;36(13):1030-6. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e80507.
3
Postoperative displacement of hydroxyapatite spacers implanted during double-door laminoplasty.
Midline Splitting Cervical Laminoplasty Using Allogeneic Bone Spacers: Comparison of Fusion Rates between Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy and Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament.
使用同种异体骨间隔物的中线劈开颈椎椎板成形术:脊髓型颈椎病与后纵韧带骨化之间融合率的比较
Korean J Neurotrauma. 2014 Oct;10(2):60-5. doi: 10.13004/kjnt.2014.10.2.60. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
4
Modified Open-door Laminoplasty Using Hydroxyapatite Spacers and Miniplates.使用羟基磷灰石间隔物和微型钢板的改良开门式椎板成形术
Korean J Spine. 2014 Sep;11(3):188-94. doi: 10.14245/kjs.2014.11.3.188. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
双开门椎板成形术期间植入的羟基磷灰石间隔物的术后移位
J Neurosurg Spine. 2009 Jun;10(6):551-6. doi: 10.3171/2009.2.17680.
4
Sagittal alignment of the cervical spine after the laminoplasty.椎板成形术后颈椎矢状位排列。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Nov 1;32(23):E656-60. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318158c573.
5
Long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy--average 14-year follow-up study.扩大开门式颈椎管成形术治疗脊髓型颈椎病的长期疗效——平均14年随访研究
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Dec 15;31(26):2998-3005. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000250307.78987.6b.
6
Long-term results after expansive open-door laminoplasty for the segmental-type of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine: a comparison with nonsegmental-type lesions.颈椎后纵韧带节段型骨化症扩大开门式椎板成形术后的长期疗效:与非节段型病变的比较
J Neurosurg Spine. 2005 Sep;3(3):198-204. doi: 10.3171/spi.2005.3.3.0198.
7
Long-term outcome of laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy due to disc herniation: a comparative study of laminoplasty and anterior spinal fusion.椎间盘突出所致颈椎脊髓病行椎板成形术的长期疗效:椎板成形术与前路脊柱融合术的比较研究
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Apr 1;30(7):756-9. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000157415.79713.7e.
8
Minimum 10-year followup after en bloc cervical laminoplasty.颈椎整块椎板成形术后至少10年的随访
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Jun(411):129-39. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000069889.31220.62.
9
Cervical laminoplasty: a critical review.颈椎椎板成形术:一项批判性综述。
J Neurosurg. 2003 Apr;98(3 Suppl):230-8. doi: 10.3171/spi.2003.98.3.0230.
10
Expansive laminoplasty as a method for managing cervical multilevel spondylotic myelopathy.扩大椎板成形术作为治疗颈椎多节段脊髓型颈椎病的一种方法。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Apr 1;28(7):680-4. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000051913.55259.5F.