• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新自由主义对我们的健康有害。

Neoliberalism is bad for our health.

机构信息

University of Sydney, Tasmania, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Health Serv. 2012;42(3):383-401. doi: 10.2190/HS.42.3.b.

DOI:10.2190/HS.42.3.b
PMID:22993960
Abstract

This paper examines some of the concerns that arise from the impact of neoliberalism on health and health care. It also examines the way that global institutions such as the World Health Organization and the World Trade Organization, having been captured by neoliberalism, fail to act decisively to reduce poverty and inequality and thereby do all too little to promote population health at a global level. The paper argues for a greater community focus, with health care systems being seen more as social institutions and placing more power over decision making in the hands of a critically-informed citizenry.

摘要

本文探讨了新自由主义对健康和医疗保健的影响所带来的一些问题。它还探讨了世界卫生组织和世界贸易组织等全球性机构被新自由主义所俘获,未能果断采取行动来减少贫困和不平等,从而在全球层面上对促进人口健康几乎没有起到什么作用的方式。本文主张更加关注社区,将医疗保健系统更多地视为社会机构,并将更多的决策权交给具有批判性意识的公民。

相似文献

1
Neoliberalism is bad for our health.新自由主义对我们的健康有害。
Int J Health Serv. 2012;42(3):383-401. doi: 10.2190/HS.42.3.b.
2
Globalisation and neoliberalism as structural drivers of health inequities.全球化和新自由主义是健康不平等的结构性驱动因素。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Oct 9;16(Suppl 1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0365-2.
3
Policy space for health and trade and investment agreements.卫生与贸易及投资协定的政策空间。
Health Promot Int. 2014 Jun;29 Suppl 1:i29-47. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dau033.
4
Bringing (domestic) politics back in: global and local influences on health equity.将(国内)政治因素纳入考量:全球与地方对健康公平性的影响
Public Health. 2015 Jul;129(7):843-8. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.05.007. Epub 2015 Jun 24.
5
Ottawa 25 years on: a more radical agenda for health equity is still required.渥太华 25 年过去了:仍需要制定更激进的健康公平议程。
Health Promot Int. 2011 Dec;26 Suppl 2:ii253-7. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dar078.
6
Shaping the future of health promotion: priorities for action.塑造健康促进的未来:行动优先事项。
Health Promot Int. 2008 Mar;23(1):98-102. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dam033. Epub 2007 Nov 15.
7
Achieving health equity on a global scale through a community-based, public health framework for action.通过以社区为基础、以公共卫生为行动框架,实现全球健康公平。
J Law Med Ethics. 2010 Fall;38(3):486-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2010.00507.x.
8
Framing and the politics of public health: an examination of competing health narratives in Honduras.框架与公共卫生政治:洪都拉斯健康叙事的竞争分析。
Glob Public Health. 2010;5(1):1-14. doi: 10.1080/17441690902830982.
9
Update on the Global Charter for the Public's Health.《全球公众健康宪章》最新情况
Bull World Health Organ. 2018 Jun 1;96(6):439-440. doi: 10.2471/BLT.17.198820. Epub 2018 May 14.
10
Trump expands antiabortion rule to include all global health funding.特朗普扩大反堕胎规定,将所有全球卫生资金纳入其中。
BMJ. 2017 Jan 26;356:j476. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j476.

引用本文的文献

1
Acting on the Evidence: The Challenges Facing Policy and Practice Comment on "Barriers and Opportunities for WHO 'Best Buys' Non-communicable Disease Policy Adoption and Implementation From a Political Economy Perspective: A Complexity Systematic Review".依据证据行事:政策与实践面临的挑战 对“从政治经济学视角看世卫组织‘最佳采购’非传染性疾病政策采纳与实施的障碍及机遇:一项复杂性系统评价”的评论
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2025;14:9022. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.9022. Epub 2025 May 27.
2
Viral Neoliberalism: The Road to Herd Immunity Still A Rocky One.病毒式新自由主义:通往群体免疫之路仍崎岖不平。
Int J Health Serv. 2022 Oct 9;53(1):207314221131214. doi: 10.1177/00207314221131214.
3
The co-production of a workplace health promotion program: expected benefits, contested boundaries.
工作场所健康促进计划的共同制定:预期效益、存在争议的界限。
Soc Theory Health. 2022 Aug 17:1-20. doi: 10.1057/s41285-022-00186-4.
4
Spaceship Earth Revisited: The Co-Benefits of Overcoming Biological Extinction of Experience at the Level of Person, Place and Planet.《重返地球飞船:在个人、地点和星球层面克服体验生物灭绝的共同收益》
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 21;17(4):1407. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041407.
5
Do elections matter for private-sector healthcare management in Brazil? An analysis of municipal health policy.选举对巴西私营部门的医疗管理有影响吗?一项关于市政卫生政策的分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jul 12;17(1):483. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2427-5.
6
Layers of inequality: power, policy, and health.不平等的层次:权力、政策与健康。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Feb;104 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S8-S10. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301765. Epub 2013 Dec 19.