The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, Ghana Health Protection Agency South West Regional Laboratory, Bristol, UK.
Trop Med Int Health. 2012 Dec;17(12):1521-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2012.03090.x. Epub 2012 Sep 20.
To evaluate the performance of two enzyme immunoassays (EIA), Murex and ICE, and the Determine TP point-of-care test (POCT) in diagnosing treponemal infection (syphilis or yaws) in patients attending a large HIV clinic in Ghana; to determine the prevalence of treponemal co-infections; and to characterise demographic and clinical features of patients with infection.
Samples were tested with EIAs and rapid plasma reagin (RPR), then POCT and reference assays for Treponema pallidum to determine prevalence of active and past infection. Sensitivity and specificity of each assay were calculated and demographic and clinical characteristics of patients compared. Data were collected from case notes of patients retrospectively.
Overall, 45/284 patient samples (14.8%, 95% CI, 11.1-19.4%) were Treponema pallidum particle agglutination (TPPA) positive, and of these, 27 (64.3%) were RPR positive and 4 (8.9%) were treponemal IgM positive. Both EIAs and Determine TP POCT showed high sensitivities and specificities for identifying infection although RPR was less reliable. Clinical features of syphilis or yaws were rarely identified in TPPA-positive patients suggesting most had previous or late latent infection. Treatment of various intercurrent infections using short courses of antibiotics active against T. pallidum was common in the clinic.
A high proportion of this HIV-infected cohort showed evidence of treponemal infection. Both EIAs as well as the POCT were practical and effective at diagnosing treponemal co-infection in this setting. RPR alone was unreliable at identifying active treponemal co-infection, however might be useful in some settings where treponemal-specific assays are unaffordable.
评估两种酶免疫分析(EIA),Murex 和 ICE,以及 Determine TP 即时检测(POCT)在加纳一家大型 HIV 诊所就诊的患者中诊断梅毒螺旋体感染(梅毒或雅司病)的性能;确定梅毒螺旋体合并感染的流行率;并描述感染患者的人口统计学和临床特征。
使用 EIA 和快速血浆反应素(RPR)对样本进行检测,然后使用 POCT 和梅毒螺旋体参考检测方法确定活动性和既往感染的流行率。计算每种检测方法的敏感性和特异性,并比较患者的人口统计学和临床特征。数据从患者的病历中回顾性收集。
总体而言,284 例患者样本中有 45 例(14.8%,95%CI,11.1-19.4%)梅毒螺旋体颗粒凝集(TPPA)阳性,其中 27 例(64.3%)RPR 阳性,4 例(8.9%)梅毒螺旋体 IgM 阳性。两种 EIA 和 Determine TP POCT 均显示出较高的敏感性和特异性,可用于识别感染,尽管 RPR 不太可靠。TPPA 阳性患者的梅毒或雅司病临床特征很少见,表明大多数患者既往或晚期潜伏感染。在诊所中,经常使用针对梅毒螺旋体的短疗程抗生素治疗各种并发感染。
该 HIV 感染队列中有很大一部分显示出梅毒螺旋体感染的证据。两种 EIA 以及 POCT 在这种情况下都能有效地诊断梅毒螺旋体合并感染。然而,RPR 单独用于识别活动性梅毒螺旋体合并感染不可靠,但在某些无法负担梅毒螺旋体特异性检测的情况下可能有用。