Department of Emergency Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Oct;19(10):1151-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01458.x. Epub 2012 Sep 20.
Patients who use an emergency department (ED) for acute migraine headaches have higher migraine disability scores, lower socioeconomic status, and are unlikely to have used a migraine-specific medication prior to presentation to the ED. The objective was to determine if a comprehensive migraine intervention, delivered just prior to ED discharge, could improve migraine impact scores 1 month after the ED visit.
This was a randomized controlled trial of a comprehensive migraine intervention versus typical care among patients who presented to an ED for management of acute migraine. At the time of discharge, for patients randomized to comprehensive care, the research team reinforced their diagnosis, shared a migraine education presentation from the National Library of Medicine, provided them with six tablets of sumatriptan 100 mg and 14 tablets of naproxen 500 mg, and if they wished, provided them with an expedited free appointment to the institution's headache clinic. Patients randomized to typical care received the care their attending emergency physicians (EPs) felt was appropriate. The primary outcome was a between-group comparison of the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) score, a validated headache assessment instrument, 1 month after ED discharge. Secondary outcomes included an assessment of satisfaction with headache care and use of migraine-specific medication within that 1-month period.
Over a 19-month period, 50 migraine patients were enrolled. One-month follow-up was successfully obtained in 92% of patients. Baseline characteristics were comparable. One-month HIT-6 scores in the two groups were nearly identical (59 vs. 56, 95% confidence interval [CI] for difference of 3 = -5 to 11), as was dissatisfaction with overall headache care (17% vs. 18%, 95% CI for difference of 1% = -22% to 24%). Patients randomized to the comprehensive intervention were more likely to be using triptans or migraine-specific therapy (43% vs. 0%, 95% CI for difference of 43% = 20 to 63%) 1 month later.
A comprehensive migraine intervention, when compared to typical care, did not improve HIT-6 scores (a validated measure of the effect of migraine on one's daily life) 1 month after ED discharge. Future work is needed to define a migraine intervention that is practical and useful in an ED, where many underserved patients, of necessity, present for care.
因急性偏头痛到急诊科就诊的患者偏头痛残疾评分较高,社会经济地位较低,并且在到急诊科就诊之前不太可能使用过专门治疗偏头痛的药物。本研究旨在确定在急诊科出院前实施全面的偏头痛干预是否可以改善患者在急诊科就诊 1 个月后的偏头痛影响评分。
这是一项针对因急性偏头痛到急诊科就诊的患者的全面偏头痛干预与常规护理的随机对照试验。在出院时,对于接受全面护理的患者,研究团队强化了他们的诊断,分享了美国国家医学图书馆的偏头痛教育演示文稿,为他们提供了 6 片 100mg 舒马曲坦和 14 片 500mg 萘普生,并为他们提供了如果他们愿意,还为他们提供了到机构头痛诊所的加急免费预约。接受常规护理的患者接受了他们的主治急诊医生认为合适的护理。主要结局是比较出院后 1 个月时头痛影响测试(HIT-6)评分,这是一种经过验证的头痛评估工具。次要结局包括评估在 1 个月内对头痛护理的满意度和使用偏头痛专用药物的情况。
在 19 个月期间,共纳入 50 例偏头痛患者。92%的患者成功完成了 1 个月的随访。两组的基线特征相似。两组的 1 个月 HIT-6 评分几乎相同(59 对 56,差值 95%置信区间[CI]为 3 = -5 至 11),对整体头痛护理的不满程度也相似(17%对 18%,差值 95%CI为 1% = -22%至 24%)。接受全面干预的患者在 1 个月后更有可能使用曲坦类药物或偏头痛专用药物(43%对 0%,差值 95%CI为 43% = 20%至 63%)。
与常规护理相比,全面的偏头痛干预并没有改善 HIT-6 评分(一种经过验证的偏头痛对日常生活影响的测量方法)在急诊科出院后 1 个月。需要进一步研究以确定一种在急诊科实用且有用的偏头痛干预方法,因为许多服务不足的患者都需要在急诊科接受治疗。