• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基础培训项目中的多源反馈分析

An analysis of multisource feedback within the foundation programme.

作者信息

Ellul Pierre, Moore Alice, Camilleri Justine, Grech Victor

机构信息

Mater Dei Hospital, Malta.

出版信息

Clin Teach. 2012 Oct;9(5):290-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-498X.2012.00537.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1743-498X.2012.00537.x
PMID:22994465
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Multisource feedback (MSF) is a mandatory assessment in the foundation programme. The current tool that is used is the validated Team Assessment of Behaviour (TAB). This assesses doctors on four domains: maintaining trust and professional relations; verbal communication skills; teamworking; and accessibility. The aims of our retrospective analysis were to analyse the number of doctors who had an MSF with any type of concern, and to assess if there is any relationship between the number of MSFs submitted and the number of concerns and the staff group.

METHOD

Data were obtained from the e-portfolio Malta database. The anonymized MSFs for the doctors in the foundation programme (FP) in Malta between July 2009 and July 2010 were analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 1868 MSF assessments from 83 FP doctors (50 foundation year-1 doctors, FY1s, and 33 FY2s) were analysed. Fifty-two FY doctors were female. The majority of assessments (97.86%) did not show any concern in any of the four domains. However, at least one concern was raised for 21.7 percent of the doctors (12 FY1s and 6 FY2s). The chance of there being a concern reported was statistically significantly higher when the MSF was completed by a more senior doctor, rather than by an FY doctor or a nurse (p = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

The aim of the MSF tool is to collate the views from a range of clinical colleagues in order to assess trainee performance. In our opinion, besides indicating when the MSFs should be performed and the minimum number that need to be submitted, it should also be mandatory that a certain proportion of MSFs should be performed by specific people (e.g. by a clinical supervisor, basic specialist trainee or higher specialist trainee working with the team).

摘要

引言

多源反馈(MSF)是基础培训项目中的一项强制性评估。目前使用的工具是经过验证的团队行为评估(TAB)。该评估从四个领域对医生进行考核:维持信任和专业关系;言语沟通技巧;团队合作;以及易接近性。我们进行回顾性分析的目的是分析存在任何类型问题的多源反馈的医生数量,并评估提交的多源反馈数量与问题数量以及工作人员群体之间是否存在任何关系。

方法

数据来自马耳他电子档案数据库。对2009年7月至2010年7月期间马耳他基础培训项目(FP)中医生的匿名多源反馈进行了分析。

结果

共分析了来自83名基础培训医生(50名第一年基础培训医生,即FY1,和33名FY2)的1868份多源反馈评估。52名基础培训医生为女性。大多数评估(97.86%)在四个领域中均未显示任何问题。然而,21.7%的医生(12名FY1和6名FY2)至少存在一个问题。当多源反馈由更资深的医生而非基础培训医生或护士完成时,报告存在问题的可能性在统计学上显著更高(p = 0.016)。

结论

多源反馈工具的目的是整理一系列临床同事的意见,以评估实习医生的表现。我们认为,除了指明何时应进行多源反馈以及需要提交的最少数量外,还应强制规定一定比例的多源反馈应由特定人员(例如与团队合作的临床督导、基础专科培训医生或高级专科培训医生)进行。

相似文献

1
An analysis of multisource feedback within the foundation programme.基础培训项目中的多源反馈分析
Clin Teach. 2012 Oct;9(5):290-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-498X.2012.00537.x.
2
How ratings vary by staff group in multi-source feedback assessment of junior doctors.多源反馈评估中不同员工群体对初级医生的评分差异。
Med Educ. 2009 Jun;43(6):516-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03333.x.
3
Effect of rating scales on scores given to junior doctors in multi-source feedback.评分量表对多源反馈中初级医生评分的影响。
Postgrad Med J. 2012 Jan;88(1035):10-4. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2011-130010. Epub 2011 Nov 3.
4
Self-assessment by trainees using self-TAB as part of the team assessment of behaviour multisource feedback tool.学员使用自我 TAB 进行自我评价,作为团队行为多源反馈工具评估的一部分。
Med Teach. 2012;34(2):165-7. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.644840.
5
Workplace-based assessments of junior doctors: do scores predict training difficulties?基于工作场所的对低年资医生的评估:评分是否能预测培训困难?
Med Educ. 2011 Dec;45(12):1190-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04056.x. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
6
Challenges in multisource feedback: intended and unintended outcomes.多源反馈中的挑战:预期与非预期结果。
Med Educ. 2007 Jun;41(6):583-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02769.x.
7
Assuring validity of multisource feedback in a national programme.确保国家项目中多源反馈的有效性。
Arch Dis Child. 2010 May;95(5):330-5. doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.146209.
8
Republished paper: Assuring validity of multisource feedback in a national programme.再发表的论文:在国家项目中确保多源反馈的有效性。
Postgrad Med J. 2010 Sep;86(1019):526-31. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2008.146209rep.
9
Multisource feedback in the assessment of physician competencies.医师能力评估中的多源反馈
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2003 Winter;23(1):4-12. doi: 10.1002/chp.1340230103.
10
Do we know what foundation year doctors think about patient safety incident reporting? Development of a Web based tool to assess attitude and knowledge.我们是否了解住院医师对患者安全事件报告的看法?开发一种基于网络的工具来评估态度和知识。
Postgrad Med J. 2011 Nov;87(1033):750-6. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2011.117366. Epub 2011 Jul 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Multisource feedback analysis of pediatric outpatient teaching.儿科门诊教学的多源反馈分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2013 Nov 1;13:145. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-145.