Suppr超能文献

学员使用自我 TAB 进行自我评价,作为团队行为多源反馈工具评估的一部分。

Self-assessment by trainees using self-TAB as part of the team assessment of behaviour multisource feedback tool.

机构信息

West Midlands Deanery, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Med Teach. 2012;34(2):165-7. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.644840.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Team assessment of behaviour (TAB) is the MSF assessment tool for doctors in training in the UK Foundation Curriculum. To encourage self-assessment by Foundation doctors of their own performance, they were asked to complete a Self-TAB.

AIM

To compare doctors' self-scores with raters' scores on TAB.

METHODS

Self-TAB scores for 834 Foundation doctors were compared with rater scores in terms of descriptive statistics, concerns, correlations and a multivariate linear regression model using SPSS.

RESULTS

Foundation doctors self-scored far fewer concerns than did raters (12 doctors as having some concern, compared with 73 doctors with some concern and 23 doctors with major concern rated by others). The correlations between Self-TAB and TAB was positive, but not high, although significant. A total of 42% of Foundation doctors correctly identified concerns confirmed by other raters.

CONCLUSION

Foundation doctors have a limited ability to self assess. Nevertheless, this needs to be developed through constructive feedback and appraisal.

摘要

背景

团队行为评估(TAB)是无国界医生组织在英国基础课程中为培训医生设计的评估工具。为了鼓励基础医生对自己的表现进行自我评估,他们被要求完成自我 TAB。

目的

比较医生自我评分与 TAB 评分者的评分。

方法

使用 SPSS 对 834 名基础医生的自我 TAB 评分与评分者评分进行描述性统计、关注事项、相关性和多元线性回归模型比较。

结果

基础医生自我评估的关注事项明显少于评分者(12 名医生存在一些关注,而 73 名医生和 23 名医生存在其他评分者评估的主要关注)。自我 TAB 和 TAB 之间的相关性是正相关的,但不是很高,尽管有统计学意义。共有 42%的基础医生正确识别出了其他评分者确认的关注事项。

结论

基础医生自我评估的能力有限。尽管如此,这需要通过建设性的反馈和评估来发展。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验