Suppr超能文献

牙医对深型窝沟龋治疗实践模式:来自牙科实践研究网络的研究结果。

Dentists' practice patterns of treatment for deep occlusal caries: Findings from a dental practice-based research network.

机构信息

Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Kyushu Dental University, 2-6-1, Manazuru, Kokura-kita, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, 803-8580, Japan; University of Florida College of Dentistry, P.O. Box 100415, Gainesville, FL, 32610-0415, USA.

Graduate School of Media and Governance, Keio University, 5322 Endo Fujisawa, Kanagawa, 252-0882, Japan.

出版信息

J Dent. 2019 May;84:76-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2019.03.009. Epub 2019 Mar 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study quantified and compared practice patterns of treatment for deep occlusal carious lesions among Japanese dentists, and tested the hypothesis that dentist characteristics are significantly associated with the decision to choose an indirect pulp capping (IPC), a form of selective carious tissue removal that involves leaving a thin layer of demineralized tissue over the pulp, that is then covered with a protective liner.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was conducted using a questionnaire survey of dentists affiliated with the Dental Practice-based Research Network Japan (n = 297). Dentists were asked to indicate what percentage of time they use three treatment options when treating patients with deep occlusal caries and possible mild pulpitis on a posterior tooth. Response options were "1. Stop before removing all caries and perform an IPC", "2. Remove all caries and proceed with a direct pulp cap", and "3. Remove all caries and proceed with endodontic-related procedures". Percentages of options 1-3 were compared by multiple comparison. Associations between dentist characteristics and a higher percentage of IPC provision (option 1) were analyzed via logistic regression.

RESULTS

Responses were obtained from 206 dentists. Median percentages (interquartile ranges) of options 1, 2 and 3 were 30% (10-59%), 10% (0-30%), and 40% (19-80%), respectively. The differences between option 3 and options 1 and 2 were significant (p < 0.001). In logistic regression analysis, a higher frequency of obtaining evidence from English-language scientific articles was significantly associated with a higher percentage of IPC, with an odds ratio of 2.28 (95%CI: 1.14-4.54).

CONCLUSIONS

Endodontic-related procedures remain the most frequent treatment option for deep occlusal caries. Frequent use of evidence-based information in English-language scientific articles was associated with Japanese dentists' preference toward IPC.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Japanese dentists would most frequently choose endodontic-related procedures, followed by IPC and direct pulp capping for treatment of patients with deep occlusal caries with possible mild pulpitis on posterior teeth. Significant association was identified between use of evidence-based information in the English-language scientific literature and Japanese dentists' preference for IPC.

摘要

目的

本研究定量比较了日本牙医对深窝沟龋病治疗方案的选择,并验证了以下假设,即牙医的特征与选择间接盖髓术(IPC)的决策显著相关,IPC 是一种选择性的龋坏组织去除方法,涉及在牙髓上保留一层薄薄的脱矿组织,然后用保护衬里覆盖。

方法

本横断面研究采用问卷调查的方式对日本牙科实践研究网络(Dental Practice-based Research Network Japan,DPRN-J)的牙医(n=297)进行调查。牙医被要求指出在治疗后牙深窝沟龋伴可能轻度牙髓炎的患者时,他们会选择哪三种治疗方案,以及每种方案的使用时间占比。备选方案包括“1. 在去除所有龋坏组织之前停止操作并进行 IPC”“2. 去除所有龋坏组织并进行直接盖髓”“3. 去除所有龋坏组织并进行根管治疗相关操作”。通过多重比较比较选项 1-3 的百分比。通过逻辑回归分析牙医特征与较高 IPC 治疗率(选项 1)之间的相关性。

结果

206 名牙医做出了回应。选项 1、2 和 3 的中位数(四分位间距)百分比分别为 30%(10%-59%)、10%(0%-30%)和 40%(19%-80%)。选项 3 与选项 1 和选项 2 之间的差异具有统计学意义(p<0.001)。逻辑回归分析显示,从英文科学文献中获取证据的频率与 IPC 治疗率的相关性较高,比值比为 2.28(95%可信区间:1.14-4.54)。

结论

对于深窝沟龋,根管治疗相关操作仍然是最常见的治疗选择。经常使用英文科学文献中的循证信息与日本牙医倾向于选择 IPC 显著相关。

临床意义

日本牙医最常选择根管治疗相关操作,其次是 IPC 和直接盖髓,用于治疗后牙深窝沟龋伴可能轻度牙髓炎的患者。在使用英文科学文献中的循证信息与日本牙医对 IPC 的偏好之间存在显著关联。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

7
Binary Response Analysis Using Logistic Regression in Dentistry.牙科中使用逻辑回归的二元反应分析
Int J Dent. 2022 Mar 8;2022:5358602. doi: 10.1155/2022/5358602. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

8
Randomized Clinical Trials on Deep Carious Lesions: 5-Year Follow-up.深龋病变的随机临床试验:5年随访
J Dent Res. 2017 Jul;96(7):747-753. doi: 10.1177/0022034517702620. Epub 2017 Apr 14.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验