Dev World Bioeth. 2013 Dec;13(3):125-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2012.00337.x. Epub 2012 Sep 20.
In their 2010 article 'Research Integrity in China: Problems and Prospects', Zeng and Resnik challenge others to engage in empirical research on research integrity in China. Here we respond to that call in three ways: first, we provide updates to their analysis of regulations and allegations of scientific misconduct; second, we report on two surveys conducted in Hong Kong that provide empirical backing to describe ways in which problems and prospects that Zeng and Resnik identify are being explored; and third, we continue the discussion started by Zeng and Resnik, pointing to ways in which China's high-profile participation in international academic research presents concerns about research integrity. According to our research, based upon searches of both English and Chinese language literature and policies, and two surveys conducted in Hong Kong, academic faculty and research post-graduate students in Hong Kong are aware of and have a positive attitude towards responsible conduct of research. Although Hong Kong is but one small part of China, we present this research as a response to concerns Zeng and Resnik introduce and as a call for a continued conversation.
在他们 2010 年的文章《中国的研究诚信：问题与展望》中，曾诚和雷斯基（Zeng 和 Resnik）呼吁其他人对中国的研究诚信进行实证研究。在这里，我们以三种方式回应这一呼吁：首先，我们更新了他们对法规和科学不端行为指控的分析；其次，我们报告了在香港进行的两项调查，这些调查提供了实证支持，以描述曾诚和雷斯基（Zeng 和 Resnik）所确定的问题和前景正在如何被探索；第三，我们继续曾诚和雷斯基（Zeng 和 Resnik）开始的讨论，指出中国高调参与国际学术研究带来的对研究诚信的关注。根据我们的研究，我们对中英文文献和政策进行了检索，并在香港进行了两项调查，结果表明，香港的学术教师和研究研究生都意识到负责任的研究行为，并对其持积极态度。尽管香港只是中国的一小部分，但我们提出这项研究既是对曾诚和雷斯基（Zeng 和 Resnik）提出的问题的回应，也是对继续对话的呼吁。
