Research for Health Environment and Development, Mangochi, Malawi.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Sep 20;12:328. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-328.
Primary Health Care (PHC) is a strategy endorsed for attaining equitable access to basic health care including treatment and prevention of endemic diseases. Thirty four years later, its implementation remains sub-optimal in most Sub-Saharan African countries that access to health interventions is still a major challenge for a large proportion of the rural population. Community-directed treatment with ivermectin (CDTi) and community-directed interventions (CDI) are participatory approaches to strengthen health care at community level. Both approaches are based on values and principles associated with PHC. The CDI approach has successfully been used to improve the delivery of interventions in areas that have previously used CDTi. However, little is known about the added value of community participation in areas without prior experience with CDTi. This study aimed at assessing PHC in two rural Malawian districts without CDTi experience with a view to explore the relevance of the CDI approach. We examined health service providers' and beneficiaries' perceptions on existing PHC practices, and their perspectives on official priorities and strategies to strengthen PHC.
We conducted 27 key informant interviews with health officials and partners at national, district and health centre levels; 32 focus group discussions with community members and in-depth interviews with 32 community members and 32 community leaders. Additionally, official PHC related documents were reviewed.
The findings show that there is a functional PHC system in place in the two study districts, though its implementation is faced with various challenges related to accessibility of services and shortage of resources. Health service providers and consumers shared perceptions on the importance of intensifying community participation to strengthen PHC, particularly within the areas of provision of insecticide treated bed nets, home case management for malaria, management of diarrhoeal diseases, treatment of schistosomiasis and provision of food supplements against malnutrition.
Our study indicates that intensified community participation based on the CDI approach can be considered as a realistic means to increase accessibility of certain vital interventions at community level.
初级卫生保健(PHC)是一种被认可的战略,旨在实现公平获得基本卫生保健的机会,包括针对地方病的治疗和预防。三十四年后,大多数撒哈拉以南非洲国家的 PHC 实施情况仍然不尽人意,因为卫生干预措施的获取仍然是农村人口中很大一部分人的主要挑战。伊维菌素社区治疗(CDTi)和社区导向干预(CDI)是加强社区卫生保健的参与性方法。这两种方法都基于与 PHC 相关的价值观和原则。CDI 方法已成功用于改善以前使用 CDTi 的地区的干预措施的提供。然而,对于没有 CDTi 经验的地区,社区参与的附加值知之甚少。本研究旨在评估两个没有 CDTi 经验的马拉维农村地区的 PHC,并探讨 CDI 方法的相关性。我们调查了卫生服务提供者和受益者对现有 PHC 实践的看法,以及他们对加强 PHC 的官方优先事项和战略的看法。
我们对国家、地区和卫生中心各级的卫生官员和合作伙伴进行了 27 次关键知情人访谈;与社区成员进行了 32 次焦点小组讨论,并对 32 名社区成员和 32 名社区领导进行了深入访谈。此外,还审查了与 PHC 相关的官方文件。
研究结果表明,在两个研究地区都存在功能齐全的 PHC 系统,尽管其实施面临着与服务可及性和资源短缺相关的各种挑战。卫生服务提供者和消费者对加强 PHC 社区参与的重要性有着共同的看法,特别是在提供经杀虫剂处理的蚊帐、疟疾家庭病例管理、腹泻病管理、血吸虫病治疗和提供抗营养不良食品补充剂等方面。
我们的研究表明,基于 CDI 方法的强化社区参与可以被视为增加社区一级某些重要干预措施可及性的现实手段。