• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性搏动流和连续流装置循环支持中的动脉壁组织学。

Arterial wall histology in chronic pulsatile-flow and continuous-flow device circulatory support.

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin.

出版信息

J Heart Lung Transplant. 2012 Nov;31(11):1171-6. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2012.08.013. Epub 2012 Sep 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.healun.2012.08.013
PMID:22995552
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Continuous-flow (CF) ventricular assist devices (VAD) are an established option for treatment of end-stage heart failure. However, the effect of long-term CF with lack of peripheral arterial wall motions on blood pressure regulation and end-organ arterial wall sclerosis, especially in the case of long-term support (> 3 years), remains unclear.

METHODS

Tissue samples obtained at autopsy from liver, kidney, coronary arteries, and brain from 27 VAD recipients supported for > 180 days between 2000 and 2010 were histologically examined to assess vascular alterations, including perivascular infiltrate, intravascular infiltrate, wall thickness, thrombosis, endothelial cell swelling, vessel wall necrosis, and peri-vascular fibrosis. Pulsatile-flow (PF) devices had been inserted in 9 patients and CF devices had been inserted in 16. The pathologist was blinded to the group distribution. Demographic, pharmacologic, and clinical data were retrospectively analyzed before surgery and during the follow-up period of up to 24 months.

RESULTS

Median duration of support was 467 days (range, 235-1,588 days) in the PF group and 263 days (range, 182-942 days) in the CF group. Demographic and clinical data before and after surgery were similar. Amiodarone was more often used during follow-up in CF group than in the PF group (61% vs 10%, p = 0.009). Throughout the follow-up period, mean arterial pressure did not differ between recipients of the 2 pump types, nor did systolic and diastolic pressure, except at 2 weeks after VAD implantation, when systolic blood pressure was higher (p = 0.05) and diastolic lower (p = 0.03) in the PF group. Histologic studies did not identify any relevant differences in arterial wall characteristics between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Long-term mechanical circulatory support with CF devices does not adversely influence arterial wall properties of the end-organ vasculature.

摘要

背景

连续流(CF)心室辅助装置(VAD)是治疗终末期心力衰竭的一种成熟选择。然而,长期缺乏外周动脉壁运动的 CF 对血压调节和终末器官动脉壁硬化的影响尚不清楚,特别是在长期支持(>3 年)的情况下。

方法

对 2000 年至 2010 年间接受>180 天支持的 27 例 VAD 受者的肝、肾、冠状动脉和脑组织样本进行组织学检查,以评估血管改变,包括血管周围浸润、血管内浸润、壁厚度、血栓形成、内皮细胞肿胀、血管壁坏死和血管周围纤维化。9 例患者植入搏动流(PF)装置,16 例患者植入 CF 装置。病理学家对分组分布情况不知情。回顾性分析手术前和随访期间长达 24 个月的人口统计学、药理学和临床数据。

结果

PF 组的中位支持时间为 467 天(范围,235-1588 天),CF 组为 263 天(范围,182-942 天)。手术前后的人口统计学和临床数据相似。CF 组在随访期间更常使用胺碘酮(61%比 10%,p=0.009)。在整个随访期间,两种泵类型的受者之间平均动脉压没有差异,收缩压和舒张压也没有差异,但在 VAD 植入后 2 周,收缩压更高(p=0.05),舒张压更低(p=0.03),PF 组。组织学研究未发现两种类型的动脉壁特征之间存在任何相关差异。

结论

长期使用 CF 装置进行机械循环支持不会对终末器官血管的动脉壁特性产生不利影响。

相似文献

1
Arterial wall histology in chronic pulsatile-flow and continuous-flow device circulatory support.慢性搏动流和连续流装置循环支持中的动脉壁组织学。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2012 Nov;31(11):1171-6. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2012.08.013. Epub 2012 Sep 18.
2
Effects of centrifugal, axial, and pulsatile left ventricular assist device support on end-organ function in heart failure patients.离心式、轴流式和搏动式左心室辅助装置支持对心力衰竭患者终末器官功能的影响。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2009 Apr;28(4):352-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2009.01.005.
3
Durability of left ventricular assist devices: Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) 2006 to 2011.左心室辅助装置的耐久性:机械循环辅助机构注册研究(INTERMACS)2006 年至 2011 年。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Aug;146(2):437-41.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.02.018. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
4
End-organ function in patients on long-term circulatory support with continuous- or pulsatile-flow assist devices.使用连续流或搏动流辅助装置进行长期循环支持的患者的终末器官功能。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2007 Aug;26(8):815-8. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2007.05.012. Epub 2007 Jul 6.
5
Post-cardiac transplant survival after support with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: impact of duration of left ventricular assist device support and other variables.心脏移植后使用持续血流左心室辅助装置的生存情况:左心室辅助装置支持时间和其他变量的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Jul;140(1):174-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.03.037. Epub 2010 May 5.
6
Long-term continuous flow left ventricular assist device support and end-organ function: prospects for destination therapy.长期持续血流左心室辅助装置支持与终末器官功能:目标治疗的前景
J Card Surg. 2010 Jul;25(4):490-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2010.01075.x.
7
Morphologic changes in the aortic wall media after support with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device.连续流左心室辅助装置支持后主动脉壁中层的形态学变化。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013 Nov;32(11):1096-100. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2013.07.007. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
8
Delayed reversal of impaired metabolic vasodilation in patients with end-stage heart failure during long-term circulatory support with a left ventricular assist device.终末期心力衰竭患者在使用左心室辅助装置进行长期循环支持期间,代谢性血管舒张功能受损的延迟逆转。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 1997 Apr;16(4):449-53.
9
Postcardiac transplant survival in the current era in patients receiving continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.在当前接受连续流左心室辅助装置的患者中,心脏移植后的存活率。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Feb;145(2):575-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.09.095.
10
Improved left ventricular unloading and circulatory support with synchronized pulsatile left ventricular assistance compared with continuous-flow left ventricular assistance in an acute porcine left ventricular failure model.与连续血流左心室辅助相比,在急性猪左心室衰竭模型中,同步搏动性左心室辅助可改善左心室卸载和循环支持。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Nov;140(5):1181-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.03.043. Epub 2010 May 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Continuous flow left ventricular assist devices do not worsen endothelial function in subjects with chronic heart failure: a pilot study.持续血流左心室辅助装置不会使慢性心力衰竭患者的内皮功能恶化:一项初步研究。
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Oct;8(5):3587-3593. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13484. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
2
Rebuttal from William K. Cornwell III, Takashi Tarumi, Justin Lawley and Amrut V. Ambardekar.威廉·K·康韦尔三世、滝美隆史、贾斯汀·劳利和阿姆鲁特·V·安巴德卡尔的反驳。
J Physiol. 2019 Jan;597(2):363-364. doi: 10.1113/JP277244. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
3
A Comparative Study of Single and Dual Perfusion During End-ischemic Subnormothermic Liver Machine Preservation.
缺血末期亚低温肝脏机器灌注期间单次灌注与双重灌注的比较研究
Transplant Direct. 2018 Oct 23;4(11):e400. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000000840. eCollection 2018 Nov.
4
Living Without a Pulse: The Vascular Implications of Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices.无脉生存:持续血流左心室辅助装置的血管学意义。
Circ Heart Fail. 2018 Jun;11(6):e004670. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.117.004670.
5
Physiologic effects of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.连续流左心室辅助装置的生理效应
J Surg Res. 2016 May 15;202(2):363-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.01.015. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
6
Absence of structural lesions in human renal arcuate arteries after LVAD implantation: response to a letter regarding "left ventricular assist devices: a kidney's perspective".左心室辅助装置植入后人肾弓形动脉无结构损伤:对关于“左心室辅助装置:肾脏视角”一封信的回应
Heart Fail Rev. 2015 Nov;20(6):753-4. doi: 10.1007/s10741-015-9507-6.
7
Letter to the Editor regarding the article "Left ventricular assist devices: a kidney's perspective".致编辑的信:关于“左心室辅助装置:肾脏的视角”一文
Heart Fail Rev. 2015 Nov;20(6):751-2. doi: 10.1007/s10741-015-9504-9.
8
Physiological impact of continuous flow on end-organ function: clinical implications in the current era of left ventricular assist devices.连续血流对终末器官功能的生理影响:左心室辅助装置当前时代的临床意义。
Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2015 Jan-Mar;11(1):12-7. doi: 10.14797/mdcj-11-1-12.
9
Why pulsatility still matters: a review of current knowledge.为何搏动性仍至关重要:当前知识综述
Croat Med J. 2014 Dec;55(6):609-20. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2014.55.609.
10
Comparison of continuous-flow and pulsatile-flow left ventricular assist devices: is there an advantage to pulsatility?连续流与搏动流左心室辅助装置的比较:搏动性有优势吗?
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Nov;3(6):573-81. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2014.08.24.