Guardiola-Wanden-Berghe Rocío, Sanz-Valero Javier, Wanden-Berghe Carmina
Department of Community Nursing, Preventive Medicine and Public Health and History of Science, University of Alicante, Campus de Sant Vicent del Raspeig, Apdo. Correos 99, 03080 Alicante, Spain.
Cien Saude Colet. 2012 Sep;17(9):2489-97. doi: 10.1590/s1413-81232012000900029.
A Systematic review of articles from peer-reviewed journals was conducted, studying the complete texts in all cases. The key words selected were: "Eating Disorders" and "Internet." Descriptive analysis was performed on the variables selected, and Fisher's Exact test was used to analyze the presence of a linear relationship between qualitative variables. Of the 7 studies reviewed, 5 (71.42%) focused on content criteria and 2 (28.57%) examined both documentary and content criteria. Documentary quality was evaluated using two assessment instruments developed by two of the authors, comprising a set of 20 different variables, 5 of which were common to both studies (25% observed percentage agreement). Fisher's Exact test revealed significant differences between the two questionnaires (p = 0.049). Studies assessing Website content used 30 different topics to classify the subject matter, of which 6 were common to 2 studies. Although generic instruments for assessing the quality of Websites devoted to eating disorders were found, no validated questionnaire was found. This research did not locate any checklist or simple tool which could be used by consumers of health information available on the Web.
对同行评审期刊上的文章进行了系统综述，所有情况均研究全文。所选关键词为：“饮食失调”和“互联网”。对所选变量进行描述性分析，并使用费舍尔精确检验分析定性变量之间线性关系的存在情况。在审查的7项研究中，5项（71.42%）关注内容标准，2项（28.57%）同时考察了文献标准和内容标准。使用两位作者开发的两种评估工具对文献质量进行评估，这两种工具包含一组20个不同变量，其中5个变量在两项研究中是相同的（观察到的百分比一致性为25%）。费舍尔精确检验显示两份问卷之间存在显著差异（p = 0.049）。评估网站内容的研究使用30个不同主题对主题进行分类，其中6个主题在两项研究中是相同的。虽然找到了用于评估饮食失调相关网站质量的通用工具，但未找到经过验证的问卷。本研究未找到任何可供网络健康信息消费者使用的清单或简单工具。
