Vandeursen H, Baert L
Department of Urology, University Hospital St-Pieter, Katholieke Universiteit, Leuven, Belgium.
J Urol. 1990 Feb;143(2):252-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)39925-1.
We reviewed 50 patients with staghorn stones to determine whether extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy is a successful alternative to the classical approaches (open operation versus percutaneous lithotripsy alone or with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy). Results free of stones at long-term followup (greater than 3 months) were obtained in 28 of 50 patients (56%) and when we included residual fragments with a diameter of less than 4 mm. (9 patients, or 18%) an over-all success rate of 74% (37 patients) was achieved. Of the patients 41 had a Double-J stent to improve fragment evacuation (5 experienced obstructive elimination), while uncomplicated evacuation was noted in the remaining 9 without a stent. No case of septicemia after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy was observed but all patients had received strict antimicrobial prophylaxis.
我们对50例鹿角形结石患者进行了回顾性研究,以确定体外冲击波碎石术单一疗法是否是传统治疗方法(开放手术与单纯经皮肾镜碎石术或联合体外冲击波碎石术)的一种成功替代方案。50例患者中有28例(56%)在长期随访(超过3个月)时结石完全清除,若将直径小于4mm的残余碎片(9例患者,占18%)计算在内,总体成功率为74%(37例患者)。41例患者置入双J管以促进碎片排出(5例经历梗阻性清除),其余9例未置入支架者碎片排出顺利。体外冲击波碎石术后未观察到败血症病例,但所有患者均接受了严格的抗菌药物预防治疗。