Bakker Lutien, Van Brakel Wim H
Athena Institute, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lepr Rev. 2012 Jun;83(2):129-53.
Many initiatives are undertaken to improve the empowerment of people with disabilities in developing countries. However, an overview of adequate measurement tools to evaluate such activities is not available to date. This systematic literature review aims to describe and assess the available tools to measure empowerment in people with disability, suitable for use in developing countries.
A systematic literature review was conducted. Articles were eligible when they described the development, validation, translation or the use of an instrument measuring empowerment in the context of disability. The instruments were assessed on their psychometric properties and on equivalence properties when they were translated.
Thirty-six articles were found in which 17 questionnaires were developed, validated, translated or used. The questionnaires varied in the construct of empowerment, the target population and the psychometric properties. None of the questionnaires were developed or validated in a developing country. The psychometric properties and equivalence criteria were not adequately described and measured in any article. The Empowerment Scale (ES) of Rogers was the most often validated, translated and used questionnaire, receiving the highest number of positive ratings for the psychometric properties.
DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: The ES is the tool most widely used to measure empowerment, but adequate validation in a developing country context is still lacking. Cultural validity should be assessed in any culture before it is used. Further research is needed to develop empowerment instruments for developing countries and to assess the equivalence criteria, including psychometric properties of such questionnaires.
发展中国家采取了许多举措来增强残疾人的权能。然而,迄今为止尚无用于评估此类活动的适当测量工具的综述。本系统文献综述旨在描述和评估适用于发展中国家、用于测量残疾人权能的现有工具。
进行了系统文献综述。当文章描述了在残疾背景下测量权能的工具的开发、验证、翻译或使用情况时,这些文章即符合入选标准。对这些工具的心理测量特性以及翻译时的等效性特性进行了评估。
共找到36篇文章,其中17份问卷得到开发、验证、翻译或使用。这些问卷在权能结构、目标人群和心理测量特性方面各不相同。没有一份问卷是在发展中国家开发或验证的。任何文章均未充分描述和测量心理测量特性及等效性标准。罗杰斯的权能量表(ES)是最常得到验证、翻译和使用的问卷,在心理测量特性方面获得的正面评价最多。
讨论/结论:ES是用于测量权能的使用最广泛的工具,但仍缺乏在发展中国家背景下的充分验证。在任何文化中使用之前都应评估文化效度。需要开展进一步研究,以开发适用于发展中国家的权能工具,并评估等效性标准,包括此类问卷的心理测量特性。